Age Ladder

[Montanha|Campeo]

I've heard a rumour that they may be introducing a ladder at under 11's next yr. anyone heard anything about it?. personally i dont really care just heard the rumour and decided to tell you.

[ronnie.Milan]

That's how it use to be but then I heard it was changed, what age do they begin to have a table and competition points now???

[Jeda]

I heard that the ffsa keep an unoficial ladder for the 11s, & that's how they come up with which 12s make it to the A's - so much for "development over winning"

[Squizzy]

If you want to know how the U11's are going, just ask a parent. I'm sure they'll be able to tell you - probably including goal difference.

[LeicesterCity]

they keep a table at Under 11 so that they can fairly divide up the teams for the following year. it's no fun for a team to get thrashed each week when they are put in the A's when they should be in the B's or C's. Olympic in the 12 A's shouldn't be there this year (or NAB)..they are both getting hammered each week.

[mattieg1200]

That's how it use to be but then I heard it was changed, what age do they begin to have a table and competition points now???

12s

[ronnie.Milan]

That's how it use to be but then I heard it was changed, what age do they begin to have a table and competition points now???

12s

Thanks

[Montanha|Campeo]

they keep a table at Under 11 so that they can fairly divide up the teams for the following year. it's no fun for a team to get thrashed each week when they are put in the A's when they should be in the B's or C's. Olympic in the 12 A's shouldn't be there this year (or NAB)..they are both getting hammered each week.

Every league needs a crap team.

[LeicesterCity]

they keep a table at Under 11 so that they can fairly divide up the teams for the following year. it's no fun for a team to get thrashed each week when they are put in the A's when they should be in the B's or C's. Olympic in the 12 A's shouldn't be there this year (or NAB)..they are both getting hammered each week.

Every league needs a crap team.

I didn't mean it that way. These kids are just kids after all. They haven't developed yet, or might never be soccer players, but they should be in a league where they are having fun, and it is competitive for them. They can only get better....

[muts]

Every league needs a crap team.

But Seaford have improved!!!!

[Jeda]

they keep a table at Under 11 so that they can fairly divide up the teams for the following year. it's no fun for a team to get thrashed each week when they are put in the A's when they should be in the B's or C's. Olympic in the 12 A's shouldn't be there this year (or NAB)..they are both getting hammered each week.

There's no garantee that the top under 11 team will be the same team that goes into the under 12s :?

if everyone was serious about mass development of players there'd be f all competition at this age group how many coaches under pressure to finish in the top half how they going to do that concentrate on development or winning ffsa - wake up & smell the coffee

[Montanha|Campeo]

Every league needs a crap team.

But Seaford have improved!!!!

Seaford r still shit though

[kyan_timberelli]

shud just do grading for at least 4 weeks prior to the season startin and who ever perform well during this time get spots in the a grade....the girls do it and it works out well

[Montanha|Campeo]

i do not agree with the 4 week thing. pointless. i didnt evn ask about fairing up the leagues.