Blades to continue fight for compensation

The forum is for discussion of club football outside Australia and national team football Please do not post any offensive or malicious comments.

Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins

Post Reply
User avatar
mattieg1200
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 4:15 pm

Blades to continue fight for compensation

Post by mattieg1200 »

Sheffield United have no intention of dropping their fight for compensation following their relegation from the Premier League last season.

The Blades maintain they were unfairly demoted after West Ham were found guilty of breaching league regulations over the Carlos Tevez affair.

West Ham, who survived relegation only on the final day of the campaign, were fined £5.5million but United have long maintained points should have been deducted.

That would have meant a reprieve for the Yorkshire club but after a long-running saga in which the club failed in an attempt to have the original punishment changed, United now want a financial settlement.

Sheffield United plc chairman Kevin McCabe said: 'We are heading towards a Football Association tribunal.

'A date has been set for next year and respective clubs are now going through respective submission of claims.

We are led by the availability of QCs and the panel, so it's more likely mid-2008 than early. It's frustrating but that's the way the law works.

'We have regrettably gone beyond reinstatement so it's about financial compensation for having been relegated unjustly after another club, we purport, broke the rules.'

United have since found life back in the Coca-Cola Championship under new manager Bryan Robson difficult.

The club are 14th in the table, five points off the play-off positions, after a 3-1 win over Ipswich last night.

McCabe insists there is no need for panic.

He said: 'It's been a frustrating start, I think every Sheffield United supporter realises that.

'I'm a supporter too but I believe in our management duo we have got commitment, determination and effort that will pull it through so this season will still be a success.'

Asked for his views on the season so far McCabe added: 'I think puzzled and perplexed is probably the best answer.

'We all believed we'd be higher up the table but we've seen in years past in this league, if you can put a run together you can catch up.'
R.I.P Robbo 8th June 2006
R.I.P Konny 1st July 2007

Liverpool-Champions of Europe 2005
User avatar
cantona_united
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 8:51 pm

Post by cantona_united »

why dont they just give up, they've already lost once, they would be better off just forgetting about the issue and focus on getting promoted again, although that doesnt look likely at this stage
User avatar
mattieg1200
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 4:15 pm

Post by mattieg1200 »

they r only a few points off the top 6 or so arent they ?
R.I.P Robbo 8th June 2006
R.I.P Konny 1st July 2007

Liverpool-Champions of Europe 2005
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Post by Missing Post Count »

Fighting bull's one thing, fighting bullshít's another.
User avatar
Hawkesy
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 16451
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:02 pm

Post by Hawkesy »

I would imagine I hate west ham more than anyone else on this board, so therefore completely agree they should have had points deducted and relegated, probably to the conference or even lower.

BUT

it's about time Sheff Utd showed some dignity and just concentrated on this season rather than last.
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Post by Missing Post Count »

Agree. It was the same when carlisle were allowed to sign a player after transfer deadline day and the player concerned score the goal that sent Scarboro out of the league. A deadline day is a deadline and in my opinion carlisle shouldn't have been allowed to sign that player in the first place.

West ham should have been docked points, but this is one fight that Sheffield United aren't going to win.
User avatar
Hawkesy
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 16451
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:02 pm

Post by Hawkesy »

Bodø Glimt wrote:Agree. It was the same when carlisle were allowed to sign a player after transfer deadline day and the player concerned score the goal that sent Scarboro out of the league. A deadline day is a deadline and in my opinion carlisle shouldn't have been allowed to sign that player in the first place.
Was that Jimmy Glass, the keeper?
Missing Post Count
Coach
Coach
Posts: 24371
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:54 pm

Post by Missing Post Count »

Hawkesy wrote:Was that Jimmy Glass, the keeper?
That's him, Jimmy Glass, but he actually scored in stoppage time to give carlisle a win that sent Scarborough down. They were allowed to sign him because a 'keeper' was a specialist position, after they had sold two keepers earlier in the season.
Post Reply