how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
What everyone else is saying is that the top 4 ranked Asian sides can mix it (and defeat i'll add) the second tier of European nations (those ranked underneath 10th in the World).
Your main argument is that North Korea qualified and that they werent as good as the 20th ranked european side. Thats the one half of your argument. Its no different to Denmark or Slovakia sneaking in in the UEFA qualifying. They had a good campaign, caused a few upsets, why shouldnt they have their place? Are you saying we should just ban the Cinderella teams from entering? Thats shitloads stupider than anything ANYONE has posted on this forum. Thats the beauty of sport.
The Second half of your argument is that in your opinion the Next 10-15 UEFA teams to qualify would out-perform the second half of the Asian representatives - and given the percentages i provided above, Its clear that they would be on par.
Your main argument is that North Korea qualified and that they werent as good as the 20th ranked european side. Thats the one half of your argument. Its no different to Denmark or Slovakia sneaking in in the UEFA qualifying. They had a good campaign, caused a few upsets, why shouldnt they have their place? Are you saying we should just ban the Cinderella teams from entering? Thats shitloads stupider than anything ANYONE has posted on this forum. Thats the beauty of sport.
The Second half of your argument is that in your opinion the Next 10-15 UEFA teams to qualify would out-perform the second half of the Asian representatives - and given the percentages i provided above, Its clear that they would be on par.
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
FIFA ranked us as 13th in this tournament, so according to that we would have made it through in 3 other groups as well.Loppermann wrote:wouldn't have happened in any other groupHawkesy wrote:we got to the final 16, I think we'll be safe.
nearly didn't as it was
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
- Russia2O18
- Star Player
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
I never said ban anyone..where is this coming from? this is strawmanseanason wrote:What everyone else is saying is that the top 4 ranked Asian sides can mix it (and defeat i'll add) the second tier of European nations (those ranked underneath 10th in the World).
Your main argument is that North Korea qualified and that they werent as good as the 20th ranked european side. Thats the one half of your argument. Its no different to Denmark or Slovakia sneaking in in the UEFA qualifying. They had a good campaign, caused a few upsets, why shouldnt they have their place? Are you saying we should just ban the Cinderella teams from entering? Thats shitloads stupider than anything ANYONE has posted on this forum. Thats the beauty of sport.
The Second half of your argument is that in your opinion the Next 10-15 UEFA teams to qualify would out-perform the second half of the Asian representatives - and given the percentages i provided above, Its clear that they would be on par.
i said qualification should be fairer
Asia only warrants 2 to 2.5 spots...if NZ or NK or Socceroos are good enough they would still qualify

Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
Just because a minnow team qualifies it doesn't mean the allocation of spots to confederations is wrong. Should UEFA lose spots because Greece and Denmark didnt qualify?OnionBag wrote:the 2 Asian teams that progressed did so at the expense of imploding African teams like Cameroon and Nigeria
Greece and Denmark were clearly the worst Euro sides at this World Cup
Japan and South Korea are the best Asia has to offer....i am not proposing zero spots for Asia...2 to 2.5 seems about right
look at CONMEBOL...they all progressed...Colombia and Ecuador could've done as well if they were in South Africa
you need to look further and look at the football that was played
NZ didnt play any
Australia werent much better but were more physical and combative as they always are..however nowhere near as good as 4 years ago where they qualified via a more testing process
North Korea were pathetic and the worst team at the tournament...but only slightly worse than NZ in football terms
You are basing your entire argument on the idea that the North Koreans are the 4th best footballers in Asia. They arent. Just because Slovakia or Denmark progressed it doesnt mean they are the tenth best UEFA team. Teams like Russia and Croatia are sitting out because they fell to lower ranked teams. Its the same here as Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq. They failed to beat North Korea, so they sit out. Simple as that.
And you are factually incorrect here - Australia is the best Asia has to offer. Just because they didn't make it past the group stage doesn't mean that they aren't the best that Asia has to offer.
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
You are having a sook that North Korea qualified and failed to perform on the big stage. Thats where it is coming from. They beat a team that would have performed better at the cup. Same as Greece, Denmark and France.OnionBag wrote:I never said ban anyone..where is this coming from? this is strawman
i said qualification should be fairer
Asia only warrants 2 to 2.5 spots...if NZ or NK or Socceroos are good enough they would still qualify
- Russia2O18
- Star Player
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
look at 2006 tooseanason wrote:Just because a minnow team qualifies it doesn't mean the allocation of spots to confederations is wrong. Should UEFA lose spots because Greece and Denmark didnt qualify?OnionBag wrote:the 2 Asian teams that progressed did so at the expense of imploding African teams like Cameroon and Nigeria
Greece and Denmark were clearly the worst Euro sides at this World Cup
Japan and South Korea are the best Asia has to offer....i am not proposing zero spots for Asia...2 to 2.5 seems about right
look at CONMEBOL...they all progressed...Colombia and Ecuador could've done as well if they were in South Africa
you need to look further and look at the football that was played
NZ didnt play any
Australia werent much better but were more physical and combative as they always are..however nowhere near as good as 4 years ago where they qualified via a more testing process
North Korea were pathetic and the worst team at the tournament...but only slightly worse than NZ in football terms
You are basing your entire argument on the idea that the North Koreans are the 4th best footballers in Asia. They arent. Just because Slovakia or Denmark progressed it doesnt mean they are the tenth best UEFA team. Teams like Russia and Croatia are sitting out because they fell to lower ranked teams. Its the same here as Saudi Arabia, Iran and Iraq. They failed to beat North Korea, so they sit out. Simple as that.
And you are factually incorrect here - Australia is the best Asia has to offer. Just because they didn't make it past the group stage doesn't mean that they aren't the best that Asia has to offer.
all the Asian teams were pathetic

Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
look at 2002. All the Euro teams were pathetic.OnionBag wrote:look at 2006 too
all the Asian teams were pathetic
- Russia2O18
- Star Player
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
look at the refereeing in 2002...Korea were given a charmed runseanason wrote:look at 2002. All the Euro teams were pathetic.OnionBag wrote:look at 2006 too
all the Asian teams were pathetic

- Echo & The Bunnymen
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:52 am
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
Look at 1966... North Korea were awesome.
Everybody's got their own good reason why their favorite season is their favorite season
- Russia2O18
- Star Player
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
they were, but it was a valid process back thenEcho & The Bunnymen wrote:Look at 1966... North Korea were awesome.
apart from the refereeing in the final that is

Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
you could say that about the Euro teams that missed out and the spots allocated to them now.OnionBag wrote: Asia only warrants 2 to 2.5 spots...if NZ or NK or Socceroos are good enough they would still qualify
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
seanason wrote:Australia is the best Asia has to offer. Just because they didn't make it past the group stage doesn't mean that they aren't the best that Asia has to offer.
I agree, and England are the best team in the world as well.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
oh so now its not the process thats crooked, its the refereeing tooOnionBag wrote:look at the refereeing in 2002...Korea were given a charmed runseanason wrote:look at 2002. All the Euro teams were pathetic.OnionBag wrote:look at 2006 too
all the Asian teams were pathetic

You need to get a grip. Asia had 4.5 slots. UEFA had 13. Even if you take out the argument that it is a World Cup and not a European Wankfest, The 3rd,4th and 5th teams from Asia would usually wipe the floor with the 14th, 15th and 16th UEFA teams.
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
Australia ranked #1 in Asia.Hawkesy wrote:I agree, and England are the best team in the world as well.
England ranked #6th Best in Europe and 8th in the World.
Your sarcasm is invalid and idiotic.
- Russia2O18
- Star Player
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
I seriously doubt thatseanason wrote:oh so now its not the process thats crooked, its the refereeing tooOnionBag wrote:look at the refereeing in 2002...Korea were given a charmed runseanason wrote: look at 2002. All the Euro teams were pathetic.![]()
You need to get a grip. Asia had 4.5 slots. UEFA had 13. Even if you take out the argument that it is a World Cup and not a European Wankfest, The 3rd,4th and 5th teams from Asia would usually wipe the floor with the 14th, 15th and 16th UEFA teams.

Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
I dont. The Arab teams would generally fill that void and they are not to be underestimated.OnionBag wrote:I seriously doubt thatseanason wrote:You need to get a grip. Asia had 4.5 slots. UEFA had 13. Even if you take out the argument that it is a World Cup and not a European Wankfest, The 3rd,4th and 5th teams from Asia would usually wipe the floor with the 14th, 15th and 16th UEFA teams.
- Russia2O18
- Star Player
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
that assumption is based on what?seanason wrote:I dont. The Arab teams would generally fill that void and they are not to be underestimated.OnionBag wrote:I seriously doubt thatseanason wrote:You need to get a grip. Asia had 4.5 slots. UEFA had 13. Even if you take out the argument that it is a World Cup and not a European Wankfest, The 3rd,4th and 5th teams from Asia would usually wipe the floor with the 14th, 15th and 16th UEFA teams.

Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
clear observations. Even you and your cooked theories should be able to tell that.OnionBag wrote:that assumption is based on what?
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
His assumptions are about as good as yours, to be fair..
The long and the short of it is, anyone arguing against Asia and Africa getting a fair share of places in the "World" Cup is just scared
of the dominence shifting away from the norm.
Hell, some euro nations may even have to change the way they do things to win a trophy
The long and the short of it is, anyone arguing against Asia and Africa getting a fair share of places in the "World" Cup is just scared
of the dominence shifting away from the norm.
Hell, some euro nations may even have to change the way they do things to win a trophy
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
OnionBag your point is better made by saying:
New Zealand qualified for the World Cup by defeating:
Fiji (once)
New Caledonia (twice)
Valuatu (twice)
Bahrain (once)
They also lost once to Fiji and drew with Bahrain.
Sweden did not qualify after being drawn in a group with Portugal and Denmark.
Czech Republic didn't qualify after being drawn in a group with Slovakia and Slovenia.
Russia didn't qualify after being drawn in a group with Germany and losing a playoff to Slovenia.
etc etc
I'm torn between both sides. I want the World Cup to be the best of the best playing each other. But I also think representation (and participation) from every Confederation is important. Maybe there should be an inter-Confederation qualifying process.
New Zealand qualified for the World Cup by defeating:
Fiji (once)
New Caledonia (twice)
Valuatu (twice)
Bahrain (once)
They also lost once to Fiji and drew with Bahrain.
Sweden did not qualify after being drawn in a group with Portugal and Denmark.
Czech Republic didn't qualify after being drawn in a group with Slovakia and Slovenia.
Russia didn't qualify after being drawn in a group with Germany and losing a playoff to Slovenia.
etc etc
I'm torn between both sides. I want the World Cup to be the best of the best playing each other. But I also think representation (and participation) from every Confederation is important. Maybe there should be an inter-Confederation qualifying process.
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
seanason wrote:Australia ranked #1 in Asia.Hawkesy wrote:I agree, and England are the best team in the world as well.
England ranked #6th Best in Europe and 8th in the World.
Your sarcasm is invalid and idiotic.
FIFA ranked australia at #3 in asia at this latest world cup, so your comment is idiotic and invalid
Japan #9
S Korea # 15
Australia # 21
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:47 am
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
look at the refereeing in the X world cup. The X team were given a charmed runOnionBag wrote:look at the refereeing in 2002...Korea were given a charmed runseanason wrote:look at 2002. All the Euro teams were pathetic.OnionBag wrote:look at 2006 too
all the Asian teams were pathetic
what's your point?
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:47 am
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
the current FIFA rankings (not world cup ones) also have Italy above England, Cameroon a good 26 places above Japan, Algeria above Korea Republic, Greece, France and Croatia above Uruguay... I could go onHawkesy wrote:FIFA ranked us as 13th in this tournament, so according to that we would have made it through in 3 other groups as well.Loppermann wrote:wouldn't have happened in any other groupHawkesy wrote:we got to the final 16, I think we'll be safe.
nearly didn't as it was
FIFA's rankings are a crock, but you knew that already
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:47 am
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
sure lost your cool thoughMr Magoo wrote:Nothing untrue in it though.Loppermann wrote:man, you got trollllledMr Magoo wrote:Copying my language now? Got you in a real state haven't I? Why do you persist in basing your arguement upon emotional predudices rather than actual results? Elitest, racist, facist.
so much rage in that post
what's more important, being right about something that no one cares about or losing your shit in a public forum where everyone can see and laugh at you?
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
Sorry to have offended you.Loppermann wrote:sure lost your cool though
what's more important, being right about something that no one cares about or losing your shit in a public forum where everyone can see and laugh at you?
Plenty of people lose it on this forum - usually over nothing more than racial taunting.
The guy's a knob and it needed to be pointed out.
Topic reached six pages in quick time. That doesn't suggest no one cares about it.
No one can see me.
People laughing at me? Glad to brighten their day.

- Russia2O18
- Star Player
- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:22 pm
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
looks like the truth hurts MagooMr Magoo wrote:Sorry to have offended you.Loppermann wrote:sure lost your cool though
what's more important, being right about something that no one cares about or losing your shit in a public forum where everyone can see and laugh at you?
Plenty of people lose it on this forum - usually over nothing more than racial taunting.
The guy's a knob and it needed to be pointed out.
Topic reached six pages in quick time. That doesn't suggest no one cares about it.
No one can see me.
People laughing at me? Glad to brighten their day.

Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
Wonder if Sepp Blatter reads Football news if so he might listen to Onion Blag and before you know it Europe will get more spots. It will be really hard for Australia but that's ok, The quality of the teams will be better (sic) and Onion Blag can have fun dissecting all the games whilst enjoying a Prawn sandwich and glass of ChardonnayOnionBag wrote:looks like the truth hurts MagooMr Magoo wrote:Sorry to have offended you.Loppermann wrote:sure lost your cool though
what's more important, being right about something that no one cares about or losing your shit in a public forum where everyone can see and laugh at you?
Plenty of people lose it on this forum - usually over nothing more than racial taunting.
The guy's a knob and it needed to be pointed out.
Topic reached six pages in quick time. That doesn't suggest no one cares about it.
No one can see me.
People laughing at me? Glad to brighten their day.
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
That's "Mr", to you.OnionBag wrote: looks like the truth hurts Magoo
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3330
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:47 am
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
not offended, just enjoy pointing out your failureMr Magoo wrote:Sorry to have offended you.Loppermann wrote:sure lost your cool though
what's more important, being right about something that no one cares about or losing your shit in a public forum where everyone can see and laugh at you?
Plenty of people lose it on this forum - usually over nothing more than racial taunting.
The guy's a knob and it needed to be pointed out.
Topic reached six pages in quick time. That doesn't suggest no one cares about it.
No one can see me.
People laughing at me? Glad to brighten their day.
Re: how many spots should Asia lose at the World Cup?
why are people bothering to reply to onionbag? you've all posted statistics, arguments and all he does it go "LOL NORTH KOREA" at you.