How the Might have fallen

SAD GAL · Post by **SAD GAL** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:29 am

Citee and Foolham

Over inflated egos and poor management will impact negatively upon these clubs.

Good management and clubs run by proactive players (ie metro and olympic for instance) will be the shining lights this year and beyond. lubs like these will attract players while the 2 above will lose players and struugle to find form and cosistency.

That's my two bobs worth....

gubs · Post by **gubs** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:41 am

Fulham have been in the top 3 since 2002! where have the other clubs been whilst this has been happening?? U cant expect things to stay that way forever. Teams lose players due to whatever reason but they also gain players and develop players which is what Fulham are doing. When was the last time Metro or Olympic won a league? How come they havent been criticised of been poorly managed in the past?

Unretired · Post by **Unretired** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:17 am

OMG SAD GAL....

How can you presume that Fulham will not preform this year after 1 game and then only losing 2-0..........to Metro who yes have recruited well.......

I can tell you that all the other years that I have been involved with this club that they have lost the first game of the season.......and still come out on top.....
So please wait to bag Fulham until at least half way thru the season to see if they do any good or not.............

bennylava · Post by **bennylava** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 11:18 am

SAD GAL wrote:Citee and Foolham

Over inflated egos and poor management will impact negatively upon these clubs.

Good management and clubs run by proactive players (ie metro and olympic for instance) will be the shining lights this year and beyond. lubs like these will attract players while the 2 above will lose players and struugle to find form and cosistency.

That's my two bobs worth....

iits been one game you idiot?

southern · Post by **southern** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:14 pm

SAD GAL!!!!

You are not only sad but also foolish!!!!

Have you got your facts right or what?!

Do you see the games or you just sit in front of this forum all day and make yourself sound stupid?

Was it hard to predict that Metro has the best lineup on papers and that at the start of the season would probably beat a team with many new players??? Good players help don't they!!?? Isn't it like when Fulham had all the SASI players so many years ago and they were simply better than other??? Plus, did u see the game? Did Metro trash Fulham!!?? NOOO they DIDN'T!! It was a well fought game. So it's all normal, keep your mouth shut or get to know what you are talking about!:shock:

Oh, and what about City too u dork? Going back to knowing what you are talking about, I'm pretty sure that the score was 1-1 not 5-0 like someone posted on another topic!!! And hearing some comments of ppl who were there (not from City btw), City had half the team out, missed a penalty and had many occasions to score too. So even there, all normal, City could have won, they drew, Olympic is strong. Great that Olympic and also others are much better than other years, that's awesome for the league. But you, SAD thing, you maybe need to pay a bit of respect to clubs that have done and are doing a lot for our sport.

You missed an occasion to shut up.

gubs · Post by **gubs** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:34 pm

haha not taking anything away from olympic but i thought it was a tad strange that they would beat city 5-0

1-1 sounds better

Easy Tiger · Post by **Easy Tiger** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:55 pm

Bad Egg wrote:SAD GAL!!!!

You are not only sad but also foolish!!!!

Have you got your facts right or what?! Do you see the games or you just sit in front of this forum all day and make yourself sound stupid?

Was it hard to predict that Metro has the best lineup on papers and that at the start of the season would probably beat a team with many new players??? Good players help don't they!!?? Isn't it like when Fulham had all the SASI players so many years ago and they were simply better than other??? Plus, did u see the game? Did Metro trash Fulham!!?? NOOO they DIDN'T!! It was a well fought game. So it's all normal, keep your mouth shut or get to know what you are talking about!:shock:

Oh, and what about City too u dork? Going back to knowing what you are talking about, I'm pretty sure that the score was 1-1 not 5-0 like someone posted on another topic!!! And hearing some comments of ppl who were there (not from City btw), City had half the team out, missed a penalty and had many occasions to score too. So even there, all normal, City could have won, they drew, Olympic is strong. Great that Olympic and also others are much better than other years, that's awesome for the league. But you, SAD thing, you maybe need to pay a bit of respect to clubs that have done and are doing a lot for our sport.

You missed an occasion to shut up.

LOL

shorty · Post by **shorty** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:01 pm

Sad Gal - who are the so called "over inflated ego's" that you are talking about from city and fulham??

beaches · Post by **beaches** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:38 pm

SAD GAL, Me thinks 4 weeks of a self imposed vow of silence would suit you fine at this time.

Easy Tiger · Post by **Easy Tiger** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:32 pm

What about Sturt and C'town? Sturt won but C'town scored THREE times!
Well done I reckon against defending champions!

Pao FC · Post by **Pao FC** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 2:54 pm

actually two of sturts goals should not have been allowed, on one occasion the striker was like 2 meters offside, and there penalty which resulted in there first goal was an accidental hand ball,the ball came pelting in at the defender and it knocked against her elbow, theres no way she coulda prevented that from happening. what exactly are the rules for this handball/accidental hanballs these days.....

...its kinda crap

shorty · Post by **shorty** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:06 pm

every ref is different... some ref's believe it is a "ball hitting arm" and others believe it is "arm hitting ball".

last year fulham were disallowed an awesome goal against sturt due to it being called offside - i guess offside decisions just seem to go in the favour of sturt!!

oh well - lifes a b!tc# sometimes. you win some you lose some! But at least life goes on and there's another 2 rounds for cambletown to get back at sturt!!!

courtz · Post by **courtz** » Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:15 pm

i havent visited this forum for about 4 months, and wow nothign changes.
i have not missed the pointless nitpicking. however i am happy to c new faces in the team lineups, hopefully there is a change in dominance... but surely after 1 game it wqould b hard to say city and fulham r doomed.
godbless internet warriors.

shorty · Post by **shorty** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 7:30 am

suuuuuuuuure CJ - u always check it - to check up on me!!

bennylava · Post by **bennylava** » Tue Apr 07, 2009 9:50 am

city = not fallen

that is all.

Home | Forums | Photos | Video | Blog | About | Contact

How the Might have fallen

How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen

Re: How the Might have fallen