Divisional Player of the Year

finderskeeper · Post by **finderskeeper** » Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:31 pm

Aldo Serena wrote:Seriously, the Div 4 list is an absolute joke. Greenock finish 6th and have two players in the top six and CC Tigers conceded 137 goals and their keeper is in their too! Disappointing we did not have one player after finishing second and losing two games, as well as Northern Utd and Polonia (3rd and 4th) missing out.

I hear it could have been 237 without him and besides, he was never out of the game.

GULLY BOYZ · Post by **GULLY BOYZ** » Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:36 pm

Aldo Serena wrote:Seriously, the Div 4 list is an absolute joke. Greenock finish 6th and have two players in the top six and CC Tigers conceded 137 goals and their keeper is in their too! Disappointing we did not have one player after finishing second and losing two games, as well as Northern Utd and Polonia (3rd and 4th) missing out.

Thats the way it goes mate,unfortunately when you have a good balanced side,players perform well week in week out and take points off each other,unless someone was an absolute stand out in your team? As for the Gullies I expected a few more but Derek was a stand out for us this year !

Aldo Serena · Post by **Aldo Serena** » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:11 pm

Point taken, but does a keeper deserve points in a 10-0 drubbing if he saved 5 or 6 goals? I dont believe so... but obviously the referees disagree! GullyBoyz, it will be interesting to see how the votes are spread across our team when the year book comes out, but would have thought a couple of players might have gone close.

finderskeeper · Post by **finderskeeper** » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:33 pm

Aldo Serena wrote:Point taken, but does a keeper deserve points in a 10-0 drubbing if he saved 5 or 6 goals? I dont believe so... but obviously the referees disagree! GullyBoyz, it will be interesting to see how the votes are spread across our team when the year book comes out, but would have thought a couple of players might have gone close.

Does a forward who scores 5 goals deserve referees points if he misses 15 other chances, I don't believe so...but they always will!
My first coach always said "the keeper is the first line of attack and the last line of defence and the ball has to get passed 10 other players before it reaches him"

nugget66 · Post by **nugget66** » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:37 pm

finderskeeper wrote:
Aldo Serena wrote:Seriously, the Div 4 list is an absolute joke. Greenock finish 6th and have two players in the top six and CC Tigers conceded 137 goals and their keeper is in their too! Disappointing we did not have one player after finishing second and losing two games, as well as Northern Utd and Polonia (3rd and 4th) missing out.
I hear it could have been 237 without him and besides, he was never out of the game.

hahahah

sore back

?

GULLY BOYZ · Post by **GULLY BOYZ** » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:43 pm

Aldo Serena wrote:Point taken, but does a keeper deserve points in a 10-0 drubbing if he saved 5 or 6 goals? I dont believe so... but obviously the referees disagree! GullyBoyz, it will be interesting to see how the votes are spread across our team when the year book comes out, but would have thought a couple of players might have gone close.

Understand where you coming from and yes will be interesting to see the year book! Refs have made some weird decisions this year so it may not come as a surprise! maybe he was the only player that didnt abuse him!

As nugget66 suggests probably didnt have time as he was getting the ball out the net most of the game!

web · Post by **web** » Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:41 am

Russell Scored a hat trick in the last game against Modbury Jets

LFTWNG11 · Post by **LFTWNG11** » Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:46 am

GULLY BOYZ wrote:
Aldo Serena wrote:Seriously, the Div 4 list is an absolute joke. Greenock finish 6th and have two players in the top six and CC Tigers conceded 137 goals and their keeper is in their too! Disappointing we did not have one player after finishing second and losing two games, as well as Northern Utd and Polonia (3rd and 4th) missing out.
Thats the way it goes mate,unfortunately when you have a good balanced side,players perform well week in week out and take points off each other,unless someone was an absolute stand out in your team? As for the Gullies I expected a few more but Derek was a stand out for us this year !

yea same... AS IF Gully didnt have all the top six players in the league, im suprised

TheWingBack · Post by **TheWingBack** » Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:36 pm

These awards are always interesting as some very good players don't get recognised due to other very good players in their team taking points and in some cases some teams are very even across the board with no one or two players standing out.

Good luck to the top 6 players in each division anyway.

bigfella · Post by **bigfella** » Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:45 pm

My predictions would be fuda to win sun div 1 and either tasovac or hayes to win sat.Any opinions from other on who they think may win?

SquishedMidden · Post by **SquishedMidden** » Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:27 pm

I'm still stuck at - "fuda for thought".... hehe (small things amuse small minds!) beautiful!

swannsong · Post by **swannsong** » Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:36 pm

web wrote:Russell Scored a hat trick in the last game against Modbury Jets

Like I say it doesn't add up, the final SAASL league table for Division 10 says B.Lodge have 55 goals for, of which players other than Russell scored 32 goals, that only leaves a maximum of 23 goals that Russell could have scored. 55-32= 23
Russell (23)
Ilduff (6)
Reid (4)
Spear (4)
Chambers (3)
Guildea (3)
McKinnon (2)
McKay (2)
Baird (2)
McMillan (1)
Campbell (1)
Lagos (1)
Stehniak (1)
Beck (1)
Sumner (1)
TOTAL (55)

web · Post by **web** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:21 am

I really dont know how they have worked it out.
Mark Russell said on the weeknd that he had 26 goals..

marooned · Post by **marooned** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:48 am

web said

Russell Scored a hat trick in the last game against Modbury Jets

according to the website they got beat 5.2, if so a nice hat trick. Didnt think own goals counted?

web · Post by **web** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:50 am

We won 5-2.
Imagine the amateur league getting it wrong.
tut tut . unheard of.

finderskeeper · Post by **finderskeeper** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:19 pm

web wrote:We won 5-2.
Imagine the amateur league getting it wrong.
tut tut . unheard of.

I hear Swanny got 2 in the last game against FOB

That gives him 26 also

web · Post by **web** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:23 pm

will make it interesting

malone · Post by **malone** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 1:46 pm

Regarding Div4

central city won 2 games, thats 2 game they should have only got votes in.

Votes always go to the winning team players
and occasionally if its a close game, a loosing team player might grap 1 point.

so if you loose 10 nil, no player in the loosing team deserves any points in a disgraceful effort.

adding up all of central citys player points shouldn't haven't even been in the top 6.

Also i think one of those games won was a forfeit.

legga · Post by **legga** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:22 pm

finderskeeper wrote:
web wrote:We won 5-2.
Imagine the amateur league getting it wrong.
tut tut . unheard of.
I hear Swanny got 2 in the last game against FOB
That gives him 26 also

Thats right swanahue is on 26 and he has already built the mahogony cabinet to put the spoils in. The league will love that having to double up.

web · Post by **web** » Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:24 pm

legga , do you think the league can afford it.
wouldnt want them to have to dig into the biscuit tin.

swannsong · Post by **swannsong** » Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:20 pm

web wrote:We won 5-2.
Imagine the amateur league getting it wrong.
tut tut . unheard of.

Maybe that's why there's a Mark Russell playing for Modbury Vista with 3 goals to his name.
In all fairness the League should force FOB to play their last fixture which they forfeited to the Downs.
legga - I think finderskeeper was mucking around about the 2 goals in the last game!
They should have a re-count with scrutineers

Di Canio · Post by **Di Canio** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:42 pm

swannsong wrote:
web wrote:We won 5-2.
Imagine the amateur league getting it wrong.
tut tut . unheard of.
Maybe that's why there's a Mark Russell playing for Modbury Vista with 3 goals to his name.
In all fairness the League should force FOB to play their last fixture which they forfeited to the Downs.legga - I think finderskeeper was mucking around about the 2 goals in the last game!
They should have a re-count with scrutineers

If you think the Fields should be forced to play this game as it may have an impact on the leading goal scorer, then there are a number of games which would have to be played.

If the easy beats Greenock hadn't of forfeited twice against the Grove and Modbury old boys hadn't changed kick off time against the Grove without notifying anyone, Justin Foster would have won leading goal scorer in div 10 easily.

robinfriday10 · Post by **robinfriday10** » Tue Oct 02, 2007 8:42 pm

in regards to points going to players in a losing team, 3 years ago florina beat budapest 10-1 first game of the season and budapests striker got three votes and their right back got one!!! this from a well respected ref! from the pontians this year anyway