Strikers_10 wrote:Droped 2 players down because of injuries.....soo shut up matee u just lost u cant hack it sore losers
Was told by one of your officials be4 the game you had 10 injuries and then after the game apparantly it was 6 injuries. No wonder you have trouble distinguishing between 19's and 17's...you can't count
Mate I can hack the losing, thats what comes in soccer, all im saying is think of them players who didnt get a game cause of people from the 19s. U think about that n then have a dream about ya Wonderful victory over Pare Hills 17s squad NOT 19's.
Ladss lets settle this i totaly agree about bringing the 19s down but when a team has injuries wat else is there 2 do...lest just focus on the rest of the season good luk 2 Para hills....
Last edited by axel.foley on Wed May 30, 2007 10:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yer it isnt right. Was a very gd shot but im not 100% sure if was intended as a shot lol. Best of luck to western strikers aswell n we shall meet again
It absolutely stinks. What strikers did is cheating and i don't care if they were eligable, if a player is being brought into a side when there are no injuies than it is cheating.
Hey Barney....I reckon the ref tonight was from the Flinstones....you know the dinosaur that Fred throws out of the door because he isn't wanted. I have been known to have the odd whinge as you know but tonight really took the biscuit. Think I'll take up tiddly winks....wonder if there is an UNDER 17's comp I could join. Imagine doing a card check as you are about to tiddle your wink
football_boy wrote:
Angus duker who plays Birkalla 19s
Sanjin J. who plays for Strikers 19s
Kosta Mastromahalis who plays Strikers reserves
Andrew Harous who plays Croydon 19s
Probly would be there top 4 players not in any order
This is from another forum but notice the Koasta Mastromahalis bloke. Pretty sure he played tonight for the 17s. N doesnt it say reserves up there. MMMM Bit of a mystery
The Point that ive been saying for the last 10 comments about playing 19s players n Now a reserve player. But games over so Gd luck to u guys in the season
Strikers_10 wrote:il tell u another thing the players that got dropped fro 19s all played 15s last year....so they are all 15
What's YOUR point...? All Clubs have quality players playing up...but not all Clubs choose to bring them down. Para Have some great kids playing 19's and 23's that are eligible for the 17's. Maybe we should do the same because I absolutely guarantee that it gives teams a distinct advantage. Granted it is within the CURRENT rules but as you have already said you disagree with it too. Winning at all costs is not what it is all about.
football_boy wrote:
Angus duker who plays Birkalla 19s Sanjin J. who plays for Strikers 19s
Kosta Mastromahalis who plays Strikers reserves
Andrew Harous who plays Croydon 19s
Probly would be there top 4 players not in any order
This is from another forum but notice the Koasta Mastromahalis bloke. Pretty sure he played tonight for the 17s. N doesnt it say reserves up there. MMMM Bit of a mystery
rabbit and a.unknown if i were you ,, i'd be asking why some of your better under 17's arent being played at a higher level ,, is it about winning a championship or about player develpoment ?
rabbit and a.unknown if i were you ,, i'd be asking why some of your better under 17's arent being played at a higher level ,, is it about winning a championship or about player develpoment ?
Our better 17's ARE playing at a higher level and what's more they stay there and don't move up and down as quick as a honeymooners arsehole. Have stacks of underage kids playing in 19's and 23's. Would be interested to know what you think it is all about? Only so much room for quality youngsters to play up. By the way our squad is extremely young and all except one or two are all playing up.
football_boy wrote:Should be an intresting game tonite even thought strikers 17s have not been doing very good lately but got few players coming back from injurie. COULD BE AN UPSET I RECKON 7.30 kick off. Anyone going down to watch this game Who do people think will win ?
rabbit and a.unknown if i were you ,, i'd be asking why some of your better under 17's arent being played at a higher level ,, is it about winning a championship or about player develpoment ?
Our better 17's ARE playing at a higher level and what's more they stay there and don't move up and down as quick as a honeymooners muscat. Have stacks of underage kids playing in 19's and 23's. Would be interested to know what you think it is all about? Only so much room for quality youngsters to play up. By the way our squad is extremely young and all except one or two are all playing up.
well thats excellent .. my thinking is,, that at this age its all about player development and if your boys performed up to your expectations of them tonight then it hasnt harmed their development and they will be all the better for it in their progress to playing at the top level
rabbit and a.unknown if i were you ,, i'd be asking why some of your better under 17's arent being played at a higher level ,, is it about winning a championship or about player develpoment ?
well thats excellent .. my thinking is,, that at this age its all about player development and if your boys performed up to your expectations of them tonight then it hasnt harmed their development and they will be all the better for it in their progress to playing at the top level
Yes, we certainly learned more tonight than we did in the pre season friendly, but will still not stoop to the depths some Clubs do just to gain 3 points. I trust the dozen or so injuries to players that couldn't play up doesn't hamper your quest for glory and I genuinely wish you the luck you deserve for the rest of the season. Bringing players down IS NOT PLAYER DEVELOPMENT
Saw the gasme tonight, at times even and a good match. I think it was 3-1 when Para went down to 10 men. Very disappointed with the reffing. The guy was "knuckle". I find it surprising that the game could not have had a FFSA ref, I thought only the u12's didn't get proper refs. The sending off was joke, the Para lad hardly touched the keeper, it was only the defender screaming like a banshee at the ref that got the result. I don't think the keeper saw it as a bad tackle in fact he got up and jogged back to his goal as soon as the free kick was awarded.
When I am king, you will be first against the wall
With your opinion which is of no consequence at all
Makem Lad wrote:Saw the gasme tonight, at times even and a good match. I think it was 3-1 when Para went down to 10 men. Very disappointed with the reffing. The guy was "knuckle". I find it surprising that the game could not have had a FFSA ref, I thought only the u12's didn't get proper refs. The sending off was joke, the Para lad hardly touched the keeper, it was only the defender screaming like a banshee at the ref that got the result. I don't think the keeper saw it as a bad tackle in fact he got up and jogged back to his goal as soon as the free kick was awarded.
What do you mean...not an FFSA ref. We were not told about that. Who was he then? Can anybody enlighten me?
I have been known to have the odd whinge as you know but tonight really took the biscuit. Think I'll take up tiddly winks....wonder if there is an UNDER 17's comp I could join. Imagine doing a card check as you are about to tiddle your wink 
Who do people think will win ?
Would be interested to know what you think it is all about? Only so much room for quality youngsters to play up. By the way our squad is extremely young and all except one or two are all playing up.
