Goalkeeper Using Ball As Weapon?
Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins
Goalkeeper Using Ball As Weapon?
Goalkeeper with ball in hands inside the box, kicks it out, ball strikes opposition player outside of the box. Referee call violent conduct, red cards the keeper, and awards a penalty. On the card writes "using ball as weapon". Thoughts?
Re: Goalkeeper Using Ball As Weapon?
The way you wrote it sounds like he was hard done by!JackRoo wrote:Goalkeeper with ball in hands inside the box, kicks it out, ball strikes opposition player outside of the box. Referee call violent conduct, red cards the keeper, and awards a penalty. On the card writes "using ball as weapon". Thoughts?
But there's always two sides to a story and multiple opinions from other witnesses, so this goes into the "cool story bro" folder for me :wink:
End of the day, how good is football!!

Re: Goalkeeper Using Ball As Weapon?
+1Nova wrote:The way you wrote it sounds like he was hard done by!JackRoo wrote:Goalkeeper with ball in hands inside the box, kicks it out, ball strikes opposition player outside of the box. Referee call violent conduct, red cards the keeper, and awards a penalty. On the card writes "using ball as weapon". Thoughts?
But there's always two sides to a story and multiple opinions from other witnesses, so this goes into the "cool story bro" folder for me :wink:
End of the day, how good is football!!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Goalkeeper Using Ball As Weapon?
If you deliberately kick the ball at someone in a violent manner then it is a red card. Roy Keane was sent off v Newcastle for throwing a ball at someone and I remember a Millwall player Adrian Serioux having the same for deliberately throwing the ball at someone when taking a throw in.
The restart confuses me though, trying to think whether the foul would be where the ball was kicked or where it hit the person. I guess it's the act that is the foul not the contact itself, so I'm thinking a penalty could be correct.
One of those incidents though that you would have to see to decide whether it was a deliberate act or not.
The restart confuses me though, trying to think whether the foul would be where the ball was kicked or where it hit the person. I guess it's the act that is the foul not the contact itself, so I'm thinking a penalty could be correct.
One of those incidents though that you would have to see to decide whether it was a deliberate act or not.
Re: Goalkeeper Using Ball As Weapon?
if keeper was trying to "BOMB" it long then yes he's using it as a weapon