Inter No. 16

RowePark · Post by **RowePark** » Mon Jul 18, 2016 1:49 pm

Dos Santos wrote:
rodney. wrote:was there a threat from the player confronting the supporter about "breaking jaws"? Or did the downs supporter just randomly go out of his way to punch a player that was on his way to the change rooms?
So every time there is a threat we can hit someone now?

think he is asking if it was retalliation, or whether there was any reason to have gotten agressive.

SISC · Post by **SISC** » Mon Jul 18, 2016 2:22 pm

It has been an incredibly difficult week at Salisbury Inter, with the passing of one of our most dearly loved and respected members. We do not wish to dishonour her memory by questioning the integrity of any opposition players, supporters or officials on a public forum with comments that are clearly speculative and subjective.

A detailed report outlining yesterdays match, including input from our two ground stewards, will be provided to the amateur league and we will speak with our players and supporters about the incident in line with the standard process.

WASHED UP · Post by **WASHED UP** » Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:26 pm

Well said Rodney. The supporter was confronted by Butler after he came charging out the change rooms being a big shot. Why did he need to do this? Why did 10/15 people jump in giving cheap shots. That's pathetic

ExtraTime · Post by **ExtraTime** » Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:34 pm

If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....

You Too · Post by **You Too** » Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:03 pm

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....

Bloodypacifier winding it up - next you'll be throwing the racist card - Salisburyites v Elizabethans.

Isn't there enough grief in this world - why is everyone so angry now days?

God is an Englishman · Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:06 pm

Dos Santos wrote:
rodney. wrote:was there a threat from the player confronting the supporter about "breaking jaws"? Or did the downs supporter just randomly go out of his way to punch a player that was on his way to the change rooms?
So every time there is a threat we can hit someone now?

Well a threat to break someone's jaw is assault.

Save Ferris · Post by **Save Ferris** » Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:37 pm

You Too wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
Bloodypacifier winding it up - next you'll be throwing the racist card - Salisburyites v Elizabethans.
Isn't there enough grief in this world - why is everyone so angry now days?

I don't think what he said is wrong.

English · Post by **English** » Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:58 pm

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....

To be fair Ghan can't punch people when they are three knuckles deep inside a bloke's anus.

moonshine3 · Post by **moonshine3** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:55 am

GET OVER IT THE LOT OF YOU & LET WHAT HAPPENS ON THE PITCH STAY ON THE PITCH. ENJOY THE FUN,BANTER,GAME & ALL HAVE A GREAT DAY

Save Ferris · Post by **Save Ferris** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:02 am

Was the incident on the pitch?

No kidding · Post by **No kidding** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:41 am

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....

So it was all Inter was it ?
There needs to be acceptance from the other parties.
Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals and within a metre or 2 of the goal line to boot ( thought that was meant to be the case anyway )
Time to move on now and let whatever investigation take place and maybe that might be a factor that needs improving ??
What will be will be..

Save Ferris · Post by **Save Ferris** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:22 am

No kidding wrote:Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals

Why not?

Brian the Postman · Post by **Brian the Postman** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:39 am

Save Ferris wrote:
No kidding wrote:Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals
Why not?

Didn't BOSA have a game abandoned because of this?

Save Ferris · Post by **Save Ferris** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:42 am

I don't know.

Bomber · Post by **Bomber** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:32 am

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....

And this has been an issue for many a year with many SAASL clubs. Its only bad if another club does it. Especially a "new" club.

legga · Post by **legga** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:40 am

No kidding wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
So it was all Inter was it ?
There needs to be acceptance from the other parties.
Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals and within a metre or 2 of the goal line to boot ( thought that was meant to be the case anyway )
Time to move on now and let whatever investigation take place and maybe that might be a factor that needs improving ??
What will be will be..

White line painted behind goal within league regulations, How do you stop anyone standing anywhere on a public recreational space. Next people will want fences like the fed's.......

Robbo · Post by **Robbo** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:09 pm

legga wrote:Next people will want fences like the fed's.......

This is where we are heading if stuff like this keeps happening

supastar#8 · Post by **supastar#8** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:27 pm

legga wrote:
No kidding wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
So it was all Inter was it ?
There needs to be acceptance from the other parties.
Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals and within a metre or 2 of the goal line to boot ( thought that was meant to be the case anyway )
Time to move on now and let whatever investigation take place and maybe that might be a factor that needs improving ??
What will be will be..
White line painted behind goal within league regulations, How do you stop anyone standing anywhere on a public recreational space. Next people will want fences like the fed's.......

Sorry Legga didn't say hello on Sunday where were you standing?

FoundIt · Post by **FoundIt** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 1:38 pm

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....

because Ghan United are the wrong ethnicity

ontheblackburner · Post by **ontheblackburner** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:27 pm

I think both clubs should be required to forfeit their next match. It seems only fair.

(Calm down everyone, we have Downs next week, all tongue in cheek)

Spectator's behind goals can be an issue. I think there should be an exclusion zone of an agreed distance, since there is no fencing.

I remember a few years back a referee moving our spectators from behind our goal.

God is an Englishman · Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:51 pm

FoundIt wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
because Ghan United are the wrong ethnicity

Got to love the race card.

ExtraTime · Post by **ExtraTime** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:53 pm

ontheblackburner wrote:I think both clubs should be required to forfeit their next match. It seems only fair.

(Calm down everyone, we have Downs next week, all tongue in cheek)

Spectator's behind goals can be an issue. I think there should be an exclusion zone of an agreed distance, since there is no fencing.

I remember a few years back a referee moving our spectators from behind our goal.

There is ..... 3 metres

ontheblackburner · Post by **ontheblackburner** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:33 pm

bloodypassit wrote:
ontheblackburner wrote:I think both clubs should be required to forfeit their next match. It seems only fair.

(Calm down everyone, we have Downs next week, all tongue in cheek)

Spectator's behind goals can be an issue. I think there should be an exclusion zone of an agreed distance, since there is no fencing.

I remember a few years back a referee moving our spectators from behind our goal.
There is ..... 3 metres

Was this being adhered to?

redfred · Post by **redfred** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:13 pm

surely the downs yobs behind the goal add to the atmosphere. people need to be able to receive and give advise and consider it banter.

swannsong · Post by **swannsong** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:47 pm

I remember a few years ago at Brahma Lodge being told by a referee to move from near the Southern end goal (closer to the corner flag than the goal) where I was taking photographs....never understood why, think he said he wouldn't restart the game until I moved.
Meanwhile at the Northern end (near the changerooms) there were about 80 spectators in a very similar area that he did nothing about..

lefty · Post by **lefty** » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:52 pm

They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

swannsong · Post by **swannsong** » Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:07 am

lefty wrote:They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

God is an Englishman · Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:58 am

Supporters should not be behind the goals. Only last week they moved all of the Liverpool supporters from the Kop as they were behind the goal.

Old Redback · Post by **Old Redback** » Wed Jul 20, 2016 10:02 am

lefty wrote:They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

legga · Post by **legga** » Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:51 am

lefty wrote:They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg

That is Rusty Gold....

Home | Forums | Photos | Video | Blog | About | Contact

Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16

Re: Inter No. 16