But it wasn't directed to the wrong person. Who I decide to make run away is my decision, not yours.
Try and keep up here. It shouldn't be this easy for me.
lol.. Run Away from what? A point we both agree on? You've got some fantasy running through your head there.
The trouble is, when you spin so much shït, you end up getting caught in your own shït web and your prey just walks away looking back and thinking what an idiot...
If I ask any question of you and your mates you grt all scared and won't answer.
It's good to be the King.
Hard to insult you at this point. It's like interacting with Orakle or ConM
There's a tinge of pity.
What's 2+2?
Not my question to answer but I'm intrigued. I will plump for 4, the same number of times Italy have won the World Cup! This is a recognised fact (if you are a sane person). lol:
Correct. Good to see not everyone runs away from simple questions.
However, italy have only won 2 world cups. World Cups prior to 1950 don't count.
lol.. Run Away from what? A point we both agree on? You've got some fantasy running through your head there.
The trouble is, when you spin so much shït, you end up getting caught in your own shït web and your prey just walks away looking back and thinking what an idiot...
If I ask any question of you and your mates you grt all scared and won't answer.
It's good to be the King.
Hard to insult you at this point. It's like interacting with Orakle or ConM
There's a tinge of pity.
What's 2+2?
Not my question to answer but I'm intrigued. I will plump for 4, the same number of times Italy have won the World Cup! This is a recognised fact (if you are a sane person). lol:
Correct. Good to see not everyone runs away from simple questions.
However, italy have only won 2 world cups. World Cups prior to 1950 don't count.
And this is my point. When you refuse to accept facts the truth becomes distorted and your argument doesn't hold water.
Regardless of this, any chance of getting back on to the main subject?, yet another thread hijacked by nonsense.
If I ask any question of you and your mates you grt all scared and won't answer.
It's good to be the King.
Hard to insult you at this point. It's like interacting with Orakle or ConM
There's a tinge of pity.
What's 2+2?
Not my question to answer but I'm intrigued. I will plump for 4, the same number of times Italy have won the World Cup! This is a recognised fact (if you are a sane person). lol:
Correct. Good to see not everyone runs away from simple questions.
However, italy have only won 2 world cups. World Cups prior to 1950 don't count.
And this is my point. When you refuse to accept facts the truth becomes distorted and your argument doesn't hold water.
Regardless of this, any chance of getting back on to the main subject?, yet another thread hijacked by nonsense.
You can't count a world cup when it wasn't the premiere competition at the time.
Hard to insult you at this point. It's like interacting with Orakle or ConM
There's a tinge of pity.
What's 2+2?
Not my question to answer but I'm intrigued. I will plump for 4, the same number of times Italy have won the World Cup! This is a recognised fact (if you are a sane person). lol:
Correct. Good to see not everyone runs away from simple questions.
However, italy have only won 2 world cups. World Cups prior to 1950 don't count.
And this is my point. When you refuse to accept facts the truth becomes distorted and your argument doesn't hold water.
Regardless of this, any chance of getting back on to the main subject?, yet another thread hijacked by nonsense.
You can't count a world cup when it wasn't the premiere competition at the time.
Hard to insult you at this point. It's like interacting with Orakle or ConM
There's a tinge of pity.
What's 2+2?
Not my question to answer but I'm intrigued. I will plump for 4, the same number of times Italy have won the World Cup! This is a recognised fact (if you are a sane person). lol:
Correct. Good to see not everyone runs away from simple questions.
However, italy have only won 2 world cups. World Cups prior to 1950 don't count.
And this is my point. When you refuse to accept facts the truth becomes distorted and your argument doesn't hold water.
Regardless of this, any chance of getting back on to the main subject?, yet another thread hijacked by nonsense.
You can't count a world cup when it wasn't the premiere competition at the time.
You're an Idiot!
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
Not my question to answer but I'm intrigued. I will plump for 4, the same number of times Italy have won the World Cup! This is a recognised fact (if you are a sane person). lol:
Correct. Good to see not everyone runs away from simple questions.
However, italy have only won 2 world cups. World Cups prior to 1950 don't count.
And this is my point. When you refuse to accept facts the truth becomes distorted and your argument doesn't hold water.
Regardless of this, any chance of getting back on to the main subject?, yet another thread hijacked by nonsense.
You can't count a world cup when it wasn't the premiere competition at the time.
You're an Idiot!
Are you saying that you would consider it a world cup if it wasn't the premiere competition at the time?
Not my question to answer but I'm intrigued. I will plump for 4, the same number of times Italy have won the World Cup! This is a recognised fact (if you are a sane person). lol:
Correct. Good to see not everyone runs away from simple questions.
However, italy have only won 2 world cups. World Cups prior to 1950 don't count.
And this is my point. When you refuse to accept facts the truth becomes distorted and your argument doesn't hold water.
Regardless of this, any chance of getting back on to the main subject?, yet another thread hijacked by nonsense.
You can't count a world cup when it wasn't the premiere competition at the time.
You're an Idiot!
Are you saying that you would consider it a world cup if it wasn't the premiere competition at the time?
Ohh I see what your doing here, not playing along!
My initial post, I stand by.
You're an idiot!
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
thebeautifulgame wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:31 pm
GIAE is in denial, just like his hero the Honeymonster who said there were no Tory parties during Covid lockdown.
So tiring when the prime hijacker plays the same old tune- too predictable and very boring.
Last comment from me on this subject unless it is directly in relation to Postecoglou.
If people didn't run away when cornered and actually answered the question there would be no need for me to repeat the questions.
thebeautifulgame wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:31 pm
GIAE is in denial, just like his hero the Honeymonster who said there were no Tory parties during Covid lockdown.
So tiring when the prime hijacker plays the same old tune- too predictable and very boring.
Last comment from me on this subject unless it is directly in relation to Postecoglou.
If people didn't run away when cornered and actually answered the question there would be no need for me to repeat the questions.
oh the irony?
are you going to answer megabonus?
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
thebeautifulgame wrote: ↑Wed Jun 21, 2023 4:31 pm
GIAE is in denial, just like his hero the Honeymonster who said there were no Tory parties during Covid lockdown.
So tiring when the prime hijacker plays the same old tune- too predictable and very boring.
Last comment from me on this subject unless it is directly in relation to Postecoglou.
If people didn't run away when cornered and actually answered the question there would be no need for me to repeat the questions.
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
Some people just need an extra helping hand. While everyone could see the obvious some are a little slower to the mark.
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
Mega has actually brought this on himself. Previously he has asked a question without that criteria and then claimed the question wasn't to me when I answered him
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
Some people just need an extra helping hand. While everyone could see the obvious some are a little slower to the mark.
Post by God is an Englishman » Fri Jun 23, 2023 11:25 am
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 9:27 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
Mega has actually brought this on himself. Previously he has asked a question without that criteria and then claimed the question wasn't to me when I answered him
Once bitten, twice shy.
only a person ducking and weaving would come up with that shiiiiite.
delusional and inferiority complex......
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
Some people just need an extra helping hand. While everyone could see the obvious some are a little slower to the mark.
Never assume Del
You mean just like you just did with this post assuming it was about you?
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
Some people just need an extra helping hand. While everyone could see the obvious some are a little slower to the mark.
Never assume Del
You mean just like you just did with this post assuming it was about you?
When did I assume that?
To quote someone the other day "you don't even need bait with him".
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
He's a shït talker, that's his world. Keep that in mind when interacting with him and his world makes more sense.
These users thanked the author Sunny Vanilla for the post:
Old Master, johndedes, theorakle, ozzie owl, suzie, thewabster, Za Dom Spremni
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
He's a shït talker, that's his world. Keep that in mind when interacting with him and his world makes more sense.
Yet when asked (many times) you have failed to be able to give a simple example of this.
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
He's a shït talker, that's his world. Keep that in mind when interacting with him and his world makes more sense.
Yet when asked (many times) you have failed to be able to give a simple example of this.
It seems your comment should be reversed.
This forum is peppered with examples.
People can see for themselves.
I'm not trying to convince you, it's difficult to convince a shît talker that they are a shît talker.
These users thanked the author Sunny Vanilla for the post:
Old Master, johndedes, theorakle, ozzie owl, suzie, thewabster, Za Dom Spremni
Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Jun 23, 2023 8:57 am
For the novices out there, in GIAE's world, your question must be in the form of a quoted post, so that the person being asking the question and to whom directed, is clearly identifiable.
Play on.
He's a shït talker, that's his world. Keep that in mind when interacting with him and his world makes more sense.
Yet when asked (many times) you have failed to be able to give a simple example of this.
It seems your comment should be reversed.
This forum is peppered with examples.
People can see for themselves.
I'm not trying to convince you, it's difficult to convince a shît talker that they are a shît talker.
Another failure to provide an example. Seriously, this is far too easy.
