Team Lists - One Hit wonder?

[billy the kid]

Am I missing something OR have there been no team lists of womens' game results in the paper lately?

[BillShankly]

very disappointed to not have seen them in last weeks paper

[SAD GAL]

For sure. Ditto mate.

Then again, I must try and make a "positive" out of this one...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Sorry can't. not in the paper = NOT Worthy/Interested/Omission/Someone has too much work/

Take a pick. The outcome is the same. Not in the paper is dissapointing and disrespectful!!

[rossie]

they appeared on ffsa website and i got the email sent out by the ffsa.

i did some investigating, rang the ffsa and they said it was submitted to the sports desk as per other weeks and same time as the men's was.

so i guess it was the paper that ommitted them. Who do we contact at the advertiser to speak to why it wasnt in?

[bennylava]

obviously, since fulham have started playing poorly, the womens prem league just isnt newsworthy anymore

[beaches]

Dont know what Fulham playing poorly has to do with Team Lists being in the paper or not. :?

[shorty]

bennylava - i think its since sturt have been playing poorly - fulham won 4 leagues and we couldnt get in the paper - geez we couldnt even get the league cup to our games when we seeled the league - but the cup was sitting on the sideline waiting for sturt when they beat us.........................

[gubs]

who said we were playing poorly too? lol

[slazenger]

who said we were playing poorly too? lol

The ladder

[gubs]

yeh coz i forgot the season was 3 games long...my bad

[ecky_8]

ahaha
yeah didn't you get the memo gubs?

[slazenger]

Sorry I forgot, Fulham are always slow to start, my bad.

[gubs]

thats ok, ur forgiven

[bennylava]

"the season is longer than 3 games and we will eventually maybe not be playing poorly"
doesnt mean
you are not playing poorly at the moment

[gubs]

we're actually not playing poorly tho.....i guess some cant really look past ladders

[ecky_8]

hey gubs are you playing? coz emma wirkus is there right?

[slazenger]

we're actually not playing poorly tho.....i guess some cant really look past ladders

Look what I found!

ill refuse to comment on that one....poor performance is all ill say

Straight from the horse's mouth!

[bennylava]

i can look past the ladders!
i generally look towards the comments of the actual fulham players
like the comments of gubs

[ecky_8]

we're actually not playing poorly tho.....i guess some cant really look past ladders

Look what I found!

ill refuse to comment on that one....poor performance is all ill say

Straight from the horse's mouth!

get over it
fulham = league champions four years in a row was it? so i think they can have a not so good season maybe..

fulham = five starters missing two games ago
last game they said they were missing players again

basically. shut up. and get over it. having players missing affects any team. even the best
and omg. three games in
i do believe you can't effectively judge a team on three games.

[bennylava]

get over it
fulham = league champions four years in a row was it? so i think they can have a not so good season maybe..

fulham = five starters missing two games ago
last game they said they were missing players again

basically. shut up. and get over it. having players missing affects any team. even the best
and omg. three games in
i do believe you can't effectively judge a team on three games.

five starters missing isnt why theyre not getting results...didnt you hear gubs? poor performances

[slazenger]

You can still play well without your starters, just not come away with the results. Anyways, there are lots of other teams in the same boat and they're holding their own.
Cumberland for instance on Sunday - they didn't get 'thumped' did they? And they were certainly minus a few of their starters.

[gubs]

for about 30 minutes we played poorly against campbelltown and we lost it....therefore, overall a poor performance. our performances against metro n city have been far from poor

[ball_girl]

get over it
fulham = league champions four years in a row was it? so i think they can have a not so good season maybe..

fulham = five starters missing two games ago
last game they said they were missing players again

basically. shut up. and get over it. having players missing affects any team. even the best
and omg. three games in
i do believe you can't effectively judge a team on three games.

five starters missing isnt why theyre not getting results...didnt you hear gubs? poor performances

I have to agree with ecky. its been 3 games.
you cant expect teams to come out with their best in the first few games. with new players its gonna take a while.
i dont think you can fairly judge a team after 3 games. at least wait til everyones played everyone once. then see how the standing is.
and ok fulham can admit to a poor PERFORMANCE. a reference to a single game, in which they've come out and said to give campbelltown some credit! they're not making excuses at all, so get over the fact that fulham lost to campbelltown. its football. anything can happen, to any team!

[ecky_8]

get over it
fulham = league champions four years in a row was it? so i think they can have a not so good season maybe..

fulham = five starters missing two games ago
last game they said they were missing players again

basically. shut up. and get over it. having players missing affects any team. even the best
and omg. three games in
i do believe you can't effectively judge a team on three games.

five starters missing isnt why theyre not getting results...didnt you hear gubs? poor performances

I have to agree with ecky. its been 3 games.
you cant expect teams to come out with their best in the first few games. with new players its gonna take a while.
i dont think you can fairly judge a team after 3 games. at least wait til everyones played everyone once. then see how the standing is.
and ok fulham can admit to a poor PERFORMANCE. a reference to a single game, in which they've come out and said to give campbelltown some credit! they're not making excuses at all, so get over the fact that fulham lost to campbelltown. its football. anything can happen, to any team!

yeah exactly. it's not like fulham girls on here are desperately trying to make excuses for their games.
and tattz is right. stop judging until yeah, maybe all the teams have played each other.
and by being all OMG fulham are playing poorly, where is the credit to campbelltown? they also scored three goals against sturt.
good on em


oh btw when did the sawsa website change? pretty recently. its looking pretty good now.
except for the pic of sawsa united up the top

[Leppskiii]

i wouldnt say fulham played well against us

[an_OK_lumberjack]

oh btw when did the sawsa website change? pretty recently. its looking pretty good now.
except for the pic of sawsa united up the top

hahaha.
good call loser head.

[ecky_8]

oh btw when did the sawsa website change? pretty recently. its looking pretty good now.
except for the pic of sawsa united up the top

hahaha.
good call loser head.

haha shut up douchebag

[ecky_8]

i wouldnt say fulham played well against us

wouldn't you?

[ball_girl]

i wouldnt say fulham played well against us

well 2-0 is hardly a thrashing.
and if you say they didnt play well and you only beat them 2-0 what are you trying to say about cumby on sunday?
just because you come out on top as the better team doesnt mean that the other team put in a poor performance.

[gubs]

Fulham played well against Metro...considering we are a new team we played well