6Aug Results

Vale · Post by **Vale** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:44 pm

U17 Mod 1- Campbelltown 2
U17 Parahills 3- Adelaide City 2
U17 Metro 1 - Cumberland 0
Does anyone have any more U17a results ?

ronaldo#7 · Post by **ronaldo#7** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:32 pm

city11-0 playford

cumberland3- 1south
metro4-1 olympic

delfino_1936 · Post by **delfino_1936** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 1:56 pm

ABE 0-0 South Adelaide

apparently correct me if im wrong.....

Comets 3-2 Western Strikers

Could i please get a confirmation of this result asap

Vale · Post by **Vale** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 3:23 pm

ABE08 wrote:ABE 0-0 South Adelaide

apparently correct me if im wrong.....

Comets 3-2 Western Strikers

Could i please get a confirmation of this result asap

Well Done ABE08, South Adelaide are a good side.
You now have another point.

mattieg1200 · Post by **mattieg1200** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 4:36 pm

u17b

gawler 1-0 enfield

manu · Post by **manu** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 4:45 pm

u17 B
Playford 0 Croydon 5

Big Wayne · Post by **Big Wayne** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:09 pm

Thought it was 0-6 ??.

manu · Post by **manu** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:14 pm

You could be right Big Wayne . either way Croydon deserved to win

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:22 pm

What happened with the croydon playford game?? did croydon stack the side with 19's or were playford missing a few?? ethier way well done lads for knocking of the league leaders should make for a interesting run home.

Anonymous · Post by **Anonymous** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:27 pm

17B

Noarlunga 2 Birkalla 0

povman_2009 · Post by **povman_2009** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:54 pm

That ladder must be getting very interesting now in the Under 17 A's

Big Wayne · Post by **Big Wayne** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:22 pm

The One wrote:What happened with the croydon playford game?? did croydon stack the side with 19's or were playford missing a few?? ethier way well done lads for knocking of the league leaders should make for a interesting run home.

There are a number of reasons how a team would turn round a 6-1 trouncing at home one week and then beat the top team 5-0 at their ground. Either:

a) change in tactics
b) opposition had a bad day
c) stack your team with u19s
d) play out of your skins or
e) all of the above

I know which one I would pick.

Kop · Post by **Kop** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:35 pm

Noarlunga beat Playford 16s 2-0. An excellent strike and a crap penalty. The ball was kicked into the defenders hand. If Playford had taken their chances early the game could've kept flowing. Well done to both teams.

da Rock star · Post by **da Rock star** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 7:41 pm

17As comets wer up 3-0 at half time aginst strikers, till strikers cam bak in da second half scoring 2, strikers also missed a penalty mid way through da second half, but comets made alot more chances through out the game 2 score mny more goals.... end result 3-2 Comets way...

Barney Rubble · Post by **Barney Rubble** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:41 pm

U16's Northern Demons 3 - Modbury Jets 1

All that way for a dodgy ref too.

Huddo #3 · Post by **Huddo #3** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:04 pm

U 16's
Modbury lose again!?!
Espically to Northen Demons
Must be playing their under 12's..

Noarlunga 2-0 Playford.
Playford missed chance after chance, only thing the goalkeeper had to do in the first half was get the ball out the back of the net, from an excellent strike from 20 yards.
Fairly even flowing game, ref gave a weak penalty during the second half, which killed off the game.
Game got cut short in the end.

BillShankly · Post by **BillShankly** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:26 pm

Under 17 teams definately need player id cards

this is getting beyond a joke.

delfino_1936 · Post by **delfino_1936** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:38 pm

Thanks Vale.

the juggler · Post by **the juggler** » Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:46 pm

What game/ team are you referring to Bill?

adam · Post by **adam** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:00 am

BillShankly wrote:Under 17 teams definately need player id cards

this is getting beyond a joke.

agree with this...

Post by **johnydep** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:22 am

BillShankly wrote:Under 17 teams definately need player id cards

this is getting beyond a joke.

All junior teams do, for some reason there is a minority that figure winning at all costs is better than development & fair play.

Our team hasn't had cards for two years, yet the Federation takes the kids money and photos, why?

SPURS 4EVA · Post by **SPURS 4EVA** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:27 pm

oh dear here we go again! forumites who should know better shooting off
b4 they get their facts right!
if you are suggesting the turnaround in form by Croydon was due to
playing overage players then you are mistaken!
there was only one boy on the pitch who was not invloved in the game against Birkalla when they were outplayed and nothing went right for them! and he has been a regular throughout the year as well as playing
for 19s on saturdays . i can assure you he is not overage!
some of the others have had limited game time in the 19s ..but not a lot!
two new players have come to the team from other clubs and yes they
have been cleared! they have taken a bit of time to gel with the group
but did so y'day against Playford!
the reason for the turnaround was more to do with a group of boys who
realised the performance the week prior was not acceptable fronting up
determined to be first to the ball ,being disciplined ,playing for each other
and the coach and club! as well as a change in structure which worked a
treat!
bill shankly- you were not even at the game when Birks humbled Croydon
maybe you should give your boys some credit for a performance (which
Croydon learnt from) as im sure thunders and dusty will tell you that on
that day everytihng went right for Birks and nothing worked for Croydon!
rather than casting doubts on Croydons honesty.....
FYI this same team also defeated Playford earlier in the year ,
the only difference being the 2 new boys!
Croydon are a proud club who do everything by the book ..unlike some
others!

BillShankly · Post by **BillShankly** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:01 pm

I cant see where i referred to croydon in any manner and i respect what croydon have achieved with their juniors over the recent years, which has been highlighted by the numerous players selected for state, development squads, aus squads, sasi etc (also a shame they dont try and break into the womens league and with the same fundamentals they have with the boys im sure they would be able to really develop some talented girls as well in the medium to long term future.)

I think you would find especially in the 17s league is that how results come about, things go right for one team and not for the other, its the breaks that teams get as they get older and the matches become more evenly competitive and contested.

With reference to the player id cards, atleast this way it will stop rumours flying around about who played overage players. Tell me one weekend where you didnt read on this forum that some team played over age players. Atleast this way it will stop it once and for all.

Hope your son is enjoying this year at Croydon and has a good remainder of the season Spurs.

SPURS 4EVA · Post by **SPURS 4EVA** » Mon Aug 07, 2006 4:45 pm

bill,
i agree cards should have been issued and hopefully this will be rectiifed
next season but is this issue going to be brought up every time an "unusual" result occurs? i also am aware of Comets u19s virtually if not
all being eligble to play 17s so cannot see why this was mentioned as it
was in the results topic as it was!
there is nothing can be done about it now and as we know FFSA is now
aware to the problems that can arise without cards... so hopefully what
has happened with that "other" club will spur them on to rectify for next
season...
lets just drop it for now and accept that the odd turnaround can occur due
to a variety of factors not just the dubious ones!

Home | Forums | Photos | Video | Blog | About | Contact

6Aug Results

6Aug Results

u14 results

16s

player cards