Cheating is cheating, end of story. I think you've even piped on that in the past. Don't ask where/when, CBF looking.God is an Englishman wrote:Wayne Kerr wrote:https://www.theroar.com.au/2011/09/30/e ... world-cup/
They replaced a dodgy ball. OK against the rules but minor and truly clutching off you think that's comparable to using sandpaper.
Aus v India - test series
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60516
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Ignore this signature
-
- Coach
- Posts: 21982
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 230 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Admitted cheating so hence guilty of cheating end of story. No debate case closed .Bomber wrote:Cheating is cheating, end of story. I think you've even piped on that in the past. Don't ask where/when, CBF looking.God is an Englishman wrote:Wayne Kerr wrote:https://www.theroar.com.au/2011/09/30/e ... world-cup/
They replaced a dodgy ball. OK against the rules but minor and truly clutching off you think that's comparable to using sandpaper.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Cheating is cheating but there’s also levels of it. That’s why different cheating gets different punishments.Bomber wrote:Cheating is cheating, end of story. I think you've even piped on that in the past. Don't ask where/when, CBF looking.God is an Englishman wrote:Wayne Kerr wrote:https://www.theroar.com.au/2011/09/30/e ... world-cup/
They replaced a dodgy ball. OK against the rules but minor and truly clutching off you think that's comparable to using sandpaper.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60516
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
So it has emerged that Ishant's first inning bowling alone had 16 no-balls that weren't called. Makes you wonder again, about standards, especially when such a tight result.
Has been a bug bear of mine in recent years, mainly occurring, so it seems, since DRS introduction, thus slackening off of the men in the middle. Umps hardly ever call no-balls any more. Do they even look? To me it's poor umpiring and guilty parties should be stood down or at least reprimanded to become more vigilant. Funny how they only get stung these days after a batsman is given out, only to be reprieved by replays showing it was a front foot no-ball.
Has been a bug bear of mine in recent years, mainly occurring, so it seems, since DRS introduction, thus slackening off of the men in the middle. Umps hardly ever call no-balls any more. Do they even look? To me it's poor umpiring and guilty parties should be stood down or at least reprimanded to become more vigilant. Funny how they only get stung these days after a batsman is given out, only to be reprieved by replays showing it was a front foot no-ball.
Ignore this signature
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v India - test series
Bomber wrote:So it has emerged that Ishant's first inning bowling alone had 16 no-balls that weren't called. Makes you wonder again, about standards, especially when such a tight result.
Has been a bug bear of mine in recent years, mainly occurring, so it seems, since DRS introduction, thus slackening off of the men in the middle. Umps hardly ever call no-balls any more. Do they even look? To me it's poor umpiring and guilty parties should be stood down or at least reprimanded to become more vigilant. Funny how they only get stung these days after a batsman is given out, only to be reprieved by replays showing it was a front foot no-ball.
I believe the umpire in question (Long), has been sacked from the series... go figure?
By the way, 36 no balls were not called.
Australia ONLY lost by 31 runs
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
MegaBonus wrote:Was the cheating umpire a Pom?
There was no cheating umpires and NO he can't be a POM as they're not allowed to officiate in test matches involving their own countries.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
interesting that the WACA groundsma was interviewed today and said that he'd prepared the wicket exactly as he was asked to do.
Who asked him?
Who asked him?
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v India - test series
MegaBonus wrote:Was the cheating umpire a Pom?
Sure is
Nigel Llong
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
He's EnglishWayne Kerr wrote:MegaBonus wrote:Was the cheating umpire a Pom?
Sure is
Nigel Llong
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
therefore a pom !God is an Englishman wrote:He's EnglishWayne Kerr wrote:MegaBonus wrote:Was the cheating umpire a Pom?
Sure is
Nigel Llong
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Well, maybe racist terms are more your speciality but POM has often been said refers to Prisoner of His Majesty, If he's English his family weren't prisoners or he'd be an aussie.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
are you offended being called a pom ?God is an Englishman wrote:Well, maybe racist terms are more your speciality but POM has often been said refers to Prisoner of His Majesty, If he's English his family weren't prisoners or he'd be an aussie.
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 8889
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
not racist....a SA court found calling a NZ a Kiwi wasn't racist....play on...
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Dave from Number 12 wrote:are you offended being called a pom ?God is an Englishman wrote:Well, maybe racist terms are more your speciality but POM has often been said refers to Prisoner of His Majesty, If he's English his family weren't prisoners or he'd be an aussie.
Depends who calls me it.
It's clearly racist
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
how is it racist ? most poms I know don't seem to mind it at allGod is an Englishman wrote:Dave from Number 12 wrote:are you offended being called a pom ?God is an Englishman wrote:Well, maybe racist terms are more your speciality but POM has often been said refers to Prisoner of His Majesty, If he's English his family weren't prisoners or he'd be an aussie.
Depends who calls me it.
It's clearly racist
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Bomber wrote:Aus 1/112 at the minute.
PS - how can being called a pom be racist if you think the term doesn't even belong to you?
I don't believe it should belong to me, however some do and if they use it to describe someone, it's racist.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60516
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Still Caucasian, so how is it racist? Do you really find it derogatory?God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Aus 1/112 at the minute.
PS - how can being called a pom be racist if you think the term doesn't even belong to you?
I don't believe it should belong to me, however some do and if they use it to describe someone, it's racist.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Bomber wrote:Still Caucasian, so how is it racist? Do you really find it derogatory?God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Aus 1/112 at the minute.
PS - how can being called a pom be racist if you think the term doesn't even belong to you?
I don't believe it should belong to me, however some do and if they use it to describe someone, it's racist.
Racism can also be based on nationality.
Depends on the context its used in.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v India - test series
Bomber wrote:Aus 1/112 at the minute.
PS - how can being called a pom be racist if you think the term doesn't even belong to you?
and closed at 4/132
Those indians pace bowlers really know how to bowl!
Bumrah is one talented swing bowler!!!
That delivery to dismiss Harris - OMG!
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60516
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
I saw some footage of a young Indian swing bowler (U/19?) who got 10/11 the other day. The wickets he got were amazing, many of which were bowled.Wayne Kerr wrote:Bomber wrote:Aus 1/112 at the minute.
PS - how can being called a pom be racist if you think the term doesn't even belong to you?
and closed at 4/132
Those indians pace bowlers really know how to bowl!
Bumrah is one talented swing bowler!!!
That delivery to dismiss Harris - OMG!
PS - Kholi is one hell of a numpty - can play cricket but still a numpty
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Bomber wrote:I saw some footage of a young Indian swing bowler (U/19?) who got 10/11 the other day. The wickets he got were amazing, many of which were bowled.Wayne Kerr wrote:Bomber wrote:Aus 1/112 at the minute.
PS - how can being called a pom be racist if you think the term doesn't even belong to you?
and closed at 4/132
Those indians pace bowlers really know how to bowl!
Bumrah is one talented swing bowler!!!
That delivery to dismiss Harris - OMG!
PS - Kholi is one hell of a numpty - can play cricket but still a numpty
Why is he a numpty?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Funny listening to comments from aussie commentators complaining about the "banter" on the pitch.
Last year the English were told to toughen up when it was mentioned that the cons were crossing the line.
Last year the English were told to toughen up when it was mentioned that the cons were crossing the line.
-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 8889
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
theyre not complaining you troll....theyre just highlighting the double standard....in fact at least 2 past Aussie captains have commented "nothing to see, move on"
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
I love it when people use troll as an insult, it's normally used by people who have no comeback to the facts.MegaBonus wrote:theyre not complaining you troll....theyre just highlighting the double standard....in fact at least 2 past Aussie captains have commented "nothing to see, move on"
Many are complaining and if you followed cricket then you would know that.