FootballNews

Posted: **Sun Feb 13, 2022 5:42 pm**

B.Toomer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 2:32 pm Correct, no free settlers. Convicts come & did their " time " and were freed to settle. Here endeth the lesson.

A wide variety of people made up this legendary “First Fleet.” Military and government officials, along with their wives and children, led the group. Sailors, cooks, masons, and other workers hoped to establish new lives in the new colony.

Posted: **Sun Feb 13, 2022 5:49 pm**

So, no convicts then? Another wokey trying to change history. This country was a penal colony, plain & simple. So, what happened to the convicts after serving their " time "? Perhaps they were all sent back to England....

Posted: **Sun Feb 13, 2022 6:17 pm**

B.Toomer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 5:49 pm So, no convicts then? Another wokey trying to change history. This country was a penal colony, plain & simple. So, what happened to the convicts after serving their " time "? Perhaps they were all sent back to England....

Dont think anyone was changing history .....
You commented there were no free settlers on the first fleet...

Can you stop trying to be like GIAE ... at least he normally talks some facts....

Youre just a grumpy old man who tries to be smart here ....but keeps failing

Posted: **Sun Feb 13, 2022 6:31 pm**

Post by B.Toomer » Sun Feb 13, 2022 5:19 pm

So, no convicts then? Another wokey trying to change history. This country was a penal colony, plain & simple. So, what happened to the convicts after serving their " time "? Perhaps they were all sent back to England....

Hey stinky...youre too stupid to realise your stupidity...

firstly, in 1788 prior to Cooks arrival, this land mass consisted of '000's of indigenous nations

from 1788-1900, we were colonies of the UK...thus not a country

in 1901, we became a country and by then, there were no living convicts meaning when we 'started as a country', we were made up of free natives (indigenous and non indegenous) as well as migrants

now, go and have a shower...

Posted: **Sun Feb 13, 2022 6:50 pm**

C U Next Saturday wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 6:17 pm
B.Toomer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 5:49 pm So, no convicts then? Another wokey trying to change history. This country was a penal colony, plain & simple. So, what happened to the convicts after serving their " time "? Perhaps they were all sent back to England....
Dont think anyone was changing history .....
You commented there were no free settlers on the first fleet...

Can you stop trying to be like GIAE ... at least he normally talks some facts....

Youre just a grumpy old man who tries to be smart here ....but keeps failing

I'll stick up for Toomer here. He has never said anything smart on any topic.

Posted: **Sun Feb 13, 2022 8:10 pm**

B.Toomer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 5:49 pm So, no convicts then? Another wokey trying to change history. This country was a penal colony, plain & simple. So, what happened to the convicts after serving their " time "? Perhaps they were all sent back to England....

He never said no convicts simply that not all those on the 1st Fleet were convicts.

Oh the fleet there were 745 convicts and 645 free persons .

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 5:08 am**

MegaBonus wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 4:44 pm
God is an Englishman » Sun Feb 13, 2022 8:58 am

Raich Carter wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 7:59 am
B.Toomer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 4:47 pm
Probably the only country in the world that was started by another country's jail clean out.
You can’t even get your history correct. Stop embarrassing yourself.
What did he get wrong?
are you saying his statement is accurate????

No, I asked "what did he get wrong?"

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:58 am**

youre funny......

if you knew his statement was wrong, why ask what it is that he did in fact get wrong....

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:41 am**

B.Toomer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 2:32 pm Correct, no free settlers. Convicts came & did their " time " and were freed to settle. Here endeth the lesson.

Incorrect.

Approximately 775 convicts were disembarked at Sydney Cove along with 645 free persons including officials, members of the ships crews and marines with their families and children

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:47 am**

MegaBonus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:58 am youre funny......

if you knew his statement was wrong, why ask what it is that he did in fact get wrong....

Ask yourself one simple question. Have I said I knew the statement was wrong?

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:49 am**

ozzie owl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 8:41 am
B.Toomer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 13, 2022 2:32 pm Correct, no free settlers. Convicts came & did their " time " and were freed to settle. Here endeth the lesson.
Incorrect.

Approximately 775 convicts were disembarked at Sydney Cove along with 645 free persons including officials, members of the ships crews and marines with their families and children

If they were guards and their families, were they really free settlers seeing as they were also forced to go?

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:13 am**

Unread post by God is an Englishman » Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:17 am

MegaBonus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:28 am
youre funny......

if you knew his statement was wrong, why ask what it is that he did in fact get wrong....
Ask yourself one simple question. Have I said I knew the statement was wrong?

did you or didnt you know the statement was wrong???

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:33 am**

MegaBonus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:13 am
Unread post by God is an Englishman » Mon Feb 14, 2022 9:17 am

MegaBonus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 7:28 am
youre funny......

if you knew his statement was wrong, why ask what it is that he did in fact get wrong....
Ask yourself one simple question. Have I said I knew the statement was wrong?
did you or didnt you know the statement was wrong???

Did you ask yourself the question?

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:33 am**

I still do not know if the statement is correct or incorrect.

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 11:42 am**

Some inaccuracies noted above; The United Kingdom did not exist in 1788, the last convict died in 1938, 37 years after federation. As for the indigenous being free in 1901, well…….

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 1:53 pm**

N5 1BH wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 11:42 am Some inaccuracies noted above; The United Kingdom did not exist in 1788, the last convict died in 1938, 37 years after federation. As for the indigenous being free in 1901, well…….

Who mentioned the UK?

Lots of convicts still alive.

Who mentioned the indigenous population.

Maybe I've missed a post because I haven't seen this.

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 2:14 pm**

I think you may have. Was just a fact check for Megabonus, you know how carried away he can get sometimes

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 3:01 pm**

N5 1BH wrote: ↑Mon Feb 14, 2022 2:14 pm I think you may have. Was just a fact check for Megabonus, you know how carried away he can get sometimes

Just seen it.

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 3:52 pm**

Unread post by N5 1BH » Mon Feb 14, 2022 11:12 am

Some inaccuracies noted above; The United Kingdom did not exist in 1788, the last convict died in 1938, 37 years after federation. As for the indigenous being free in 1901, well…….

he died a free man...not as a convict.

Posted: **Mon Feb 14, 2022 4:20 pm**

He was either a free settler or a convict

Posted: **Tue Feb 15, 2022 12:05 pm**

Bomber wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 1:00 pm
B.Toomer wrote: ↑Fri Feb 11, 2022 12:31 pm Yes, we cleaned out the dregs from our jails and started a country called Australia. It's a cross you will just have to bear.
...........and you're here, so we have to bear with that.

Posted: **Wed Feb 16, 2022 3:33 pm**

Australia gave England Fosters and we get B.Toomer in return

2 dud deals

Posted: **Wed Feb 16, 2022 4:23 pm**

England gave Australia convicts and get aussie drunks in return.

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2022 8:43 am**

B.Toomer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 4:23 pm England gave Australia convicts and get aussie drunks in return.

You'd need to drink if you had to go there.

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:36 am**

Bomber wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 8:43 am
B.Toomer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 4:23 pm England gave Australia convicts and get aussie drunks in return.
You'd need to drink if you had to go there.

Well at least you can get decent beer.

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:37 am**

C U Next Saturday wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 3:33 pm Australia gave England Fosters and we get B.Toomer in return

2 dud deals

I find it strange that you don't drink Fosters over here, it's the best australian beer I've ever had.

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2022 11:18 am**

God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 10:36 am
Bomber wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 8:43 am
B.Toomer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 4:23 pm England gave Australia convicts and get aussie drunks in return.
You'd need to drink if you had to go there.
Well at least you can get decent beer.

I'd need strong spirits over there. Trust some good European exports are available.

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:02 pm**

Obviously you've never been to England.

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:55 pm**

B.Toomer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:02 pm Obviously you've never been to England.

I guess he has ..hence why he lives here

Posted: **Thu Feb 17, 2022 3:21 pm**

C U Next Saturday wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:55 pm
B.Toomer wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:02 pm Obviously you've never been to England.
I guess he has ..hence why he lives here

Imagine how bad it must be when he bags it so much here, yet still here he is!

FootballNews

Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22

Re: Ashes 21/22