Page 1 of 1

Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:54 am
by ozzie owl
Two great results for the Matildas and both games brilliantly supported.

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:58 am
by God is an Englishman
Where is Matilda?

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:29 pm
by Old Master
God is an Englishman wrote:Where is Matilda?

Isn't she Abba's 'Dancing Queen'?

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:40 pm
by Grosso
another captivating thread

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:31 pm
by Old Master
The Matildas are spitting chips now that Sam Kerr didn't even make the FIFA Top Ten in the 'Player of the Year' awards, quite rightly I believe, she's the best thing to happen to the Women's game for a long time.

Marta has lost her shine now and is having to foul her opponent to win the ball and then falls over screaming if she gets tackled - unfortunately the Referees haven't realised that yet.

She gets caught with the ball regularly now, as she's not as fast as she was and lacks the ability to 'burn off' her opponents as easily.

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2017 8:02 pm
by Grosso
Old Master wrote:The Matildas are spitting chips now that Sam Kerr didn't even make the FIFA Top Ten in the 'Player of the Year' awards, quite rightly I believe, she's the best thing to happen to the Women's game for a long time.

Marta has lost her shine now and is having to foul her opponent to win the ball and then falls over screaming if she gets tackled - unfortunately the Referees haven't realised that yet.

She gets caught with the ball regularly now, as she's not as fast as she was and lacks the ability to 'burn off' her opponents as easily.
FIFA got it right. Doing backflips doesnt mean you're a good footballer.
Skips getting carried away with meaningless friendlies.

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 12:47 pm
by Stitch This
Grosso wrote:
Old Master wrote:The Matildas are spitting chips now that Sam Kerr didn't even make the FIFA Top Ten in the 'Player of the Year' awards, quite rightly I believe, she's the best thing to happen to the Women's game for a long time.

Marta has lost her shine now and is having to foul her opponent to win the ball and then falls over screaming if she gets tackled - unfortunately the Referees haven't realised that yet.

She gets caught with the ball regularly now, as she's not as fast as she was and lacks the ability to 'burn off' her opponents as easily.
FIFA got it right. Doing backflips doesnt mean you're a good footballer.
Skips getting carried away with meaningless friendlies.
But she did make the top Ten 10

http://www.fifa.com/the-best-fifa-footb ... index.html

You two deserve each other :P

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:26 pm
by Old Master
Stitch This wrote:
Grosso wrote:
Old Master wrote:The Matildas are spitting chips now that Sam Kerr didn't even make the FIFA Top Ten in the 'Player of the Year' awards, quite rightly I believe, she's the best thing to happen to the Women's game for a long time.

Marta has lost her shine now and is having to foul her opponent to win the ball and then falls over screaming if she gets tackled - unfortunately the Referees haven't realised that yet.

She gets caught with the ball regularly now, as she's not as fast as she was and lacks the ability to 'burn off' her opponents as easily.
FIFA got it right. Doing backflips doesnt mean you're a good footballer.
Skips getting carried away with meaningless friendlies.
But she did make the top Ten 10

http://www.fifa.com/the-best-fifa-footb ... index.html

You two deserve each other :P


:oops: :oops: :oops:

I meant to say they were upset about Kerr not making the Final Three.

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2017 1:55 pm
by GaylyColouredStumps
Old Master wrote:
Stitch This wrote: But she did make the top Ten 10

http://www.fifa.com/the-best-fifa-footb ... index.html

You two deserve each other :P


:oops: :oops: :oops:

I meant to say they were upset about Kerr not making the Final Three.
Sure you did. So are they quite rightly spitting chips still, you think she is top 3?

And Marta didn't make top ten so I'm not sure how your rant about her relates to anything.

Come to think of it, your post was probably right on, considering. :lol:

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:55 am
by Raich Carter
Grosso wrote:
Old Master wrote:The Matildas are spitting chips now that Sam Kerr didn't even make the FIFA Top Ten in the 'Player of the Year' awards, quite rightly I believe, she's the best thing to happen to the Women's game for a long time.

Marta has lost her shine now and is having to foul her opponent to win the ball and then falls over screaming if she gets tackled - unfortunately the Referees haven't realised that yet.

She gets caught with the ball regularly now, as she's not as fast as she was and lacks the ability to 'burn off' her opponents as easily.
FIFA got it right. Doing backflips doesnt mean you're a good footballer.
Skips getting carried away with meaningless friendlies.
Grosso getting carried away with delusions of relevance

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:11 am
by Grosso
Mackem Lad wrote:
Grosso wrote:
Old Master wrote:The Matildas are spitting chips now that Sam Kerr didn't even make the FIFA Top Ten in the 'Player of the Year' awards, quite rightly I believe, she's the best thing to happen to the Women's game for a long time.

Marta has lost her shine now and is having to foul her opponent to win the ball and then falls over screaming if she gets tackled - unfortunately the Referees haven't realised that yet.

She gets caught with the ball regularly now, as she's not as fast as she was and lacks the ability to 'burn off' her opponents as easily.
FIFA got it right. Doing backflips doesnt mean you're a good footballer.
Skips getting carried away with meaningless friendlies.
Grosso getting carried away with delusions of relevance
But you cant ignore Grosso.

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 2:56 pm
by Bomber
^ Foe button. Easy

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 4:18 pm
by GaylyColouredStumps
Just out of interest, does anyone believe that Kerr should have made the top three?

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 5:45 pm
by Grosso
Bomber wrote:^ Foe button. Easy
Why haven't you done it then? :lol:

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:04 am
by Bomber
Grosso wrote:
Bomber wrote:^ Foe button. Easy
Why haven't you done it then? :lol:
I don't foe anyone. But your mental state is one that does arouse need for further studies into paranoid psychotics. Enough material there for an entire conference.

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:04 am
by ozzie owl
Bomber wrote:^ Foe button. Easy
Works well until they are quoted , however it is like acoustic insulation , as it does absorb up to 75% of unwanted noise.

Re: Matildas v Brazil

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2017 9:18 am
by God is an Englishman
ozzie owl wrote:
Bomber wrote:^ Foe button. Easy
Works well until they are quoted , however it is like acoustic insulation , as it does absorb up to 75% of unwanted noise.
It also means you don't hear all those horrrible opinions of people you don't agree with. Poor little snowflake.