Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2018 12:32 pm
It was just pitch reports
My mum gave it to me
Lehman wasn't involved
My mum gave it to me
Lehman wasn't involved
So, the penny finally drops, good for you.God is an Englishman wrote:It was just pitch reports
My mum gave it to me
Lehman wasn't involved
It's a misspelling of a hypocritical racist cheat.Bomber wrote:So, the penny finally drops, good for you.God is an Englishman wrote:It was just pitch reports
My mum gave it to me
Lehman wasn't involved
Who's this Lehman bloke?
You said it yourself!God is an Englishman wrote:
Lehman wasn't involved
Bomber wrote:You said it yourself!God is an Englishman wrote:
Lehman wasn't involved
So when Atherton did it, were all poms labelled cheats?God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:You said it yourself!God is an Englishman wrote:
Lehman wasn't involved
Another cricket australia cover up. Nothing changes. Give it a week and australians will be saying they don't cheat. Some are already trying to defend it.
I can not see Lehman getting reappointed when his position comes up for reappointment.Bomber wrote:You said it yourself!God is an Englishman wrote:
Lehman wasn't involved
I'm pretty sure his plan was to finish when his contract expires - after next Ashes seriesMr Red wrote:I can not see Lehman getting reappointed when his position comes up for reappointment.Bomber wrote:You said it yourself!God is an Englishman wrote:
Lehman wasn't involved
I'm pretty sure his plan was to finish when his contract expires - after next Ashes series[/quote]Frank Costanza wrote:
I can not see Lehman getting reappointed when his position comes up for reappointment.
Bomber wrote:
So when Atherton did it, were all poms labelled cheats?
Marcus Trescothick admitted in his autobiography, Coming Back to Me, that he used mints to shine the ball to produce more swing. Aus lost the 2005 series if anyone who is actually a cricket fan can remember.
Bowlers Stuart Broad and James Anderson were accused of ball tampering by rubbing the ball on the ground with their spikes in the third Test Match against South Africa Nasser Hussain, who had captained Anderson, said: "Stuart Broad and James Anderson were wrong to behave in the manner they did and I've no doubt that if a player from another country did the same we'd have said they were cheating.
You'll rarely find two separate incidents exactly the same. I remember the old saying when I joined the banking industry - there are no degrees of honesty.God is an Englishman wrote:Yes, exactly the same
I don't believe I've ever said ALL aussies.Bomber wrote:You'll rarely find two separate incidents exactly the same. I remember the old saying when I joined the banking industry - there are no degrees of honesty.God is an Englishman wrote:Yes, exactly the same
Cheating is an act - what the Aussies did was terrible, we all know that but if you want to label all Aussies as cheats, fine, all poms are cheats too then. Silly isn't it.
Deflection? You might want to take a step back and understand that players involved will be dealt with hard, and therefore commensurate with the crime. That is, others have tampered with the ball, got much less penalty, which is right considering the circumstances.God is an Englishman wrote:I don't believe I've ever said ALL aussies.Bomber wrote:You'll rarely find two separate incidents exactly the same. I remember the old saying when I joined the banking industry - there are no degrees of honesty.God is an Englishman wrote:Yes, exactly the same
Cheating is an act - what the Aussies did was terrible, we all know that but if you want to label all Aussies as cheats, fine, all poms are cheats too then. Silly isn't it.
The deflection from some of you is funny though.
what people?Not just that but it's shown that people who have said it's happening have been right all along.
MegaBonus wrote:what people?Not just that but it's shown that people who have said it's happening have been right all along.
Many others.MegaBonus wrote:you don't count...any others???
BTW...you lost all credibility with that comment...
OKMegaBonus wrote:youre piss weak....
Do you ever listen to yourself? In essence, you're saying ok to cheat as long as its on certain terms. The Saffers aren't going to lie about something the cameras have picked up on, just like how the Aussies came clean after they knew they were caught. Yes, the Aussies one was worse as it was pre-meditated, but please, your "mercy" with the saffers who have been guilty of ball tampering on numerous occasions is showing your bias up way too much.God is an Englishman wrote:Have the Saffers lied about it? Have they created something to try and cover it up?
The fact you try and say others have done it etc.. is worrying. When it comes to ball tampering, this is the worst one of all. Not just that but it's shown that people who have said it's happening have been right all along.
Bomber wrote:Do you ever listen to yourself? In essence, you're saying ok to cheat as long as its on certain terms. The Saffers aren't going to lie about something the cameras have picked up on, just like how the Aussies came clean after they knew they were caught. Yes, the Aussies one was worse as it was pre-meditated, but please, your "mercy" with the saffers who have been guilty of ball tampering on numerous occasions is showing your bias up way too much.God is an Englishman wrote:Have the Saffers lied about it? Have they created something to try and cover it up?
The fact you try and say others have done it etc.. is worrying. When it comes to ball tampering, this is the worst one of all. Not just that but it's shown that people who have said it's happening have been right all along.