FootballNews

Oh dear Broad, maybe time for you to take up basketball

predator wrote:Oh dear Broad, maybe time for you to take up basketball

Not sure if your knowledge extends this far but he's a bowler. He's also taken more wickets this year than any convict.

Still not getting the excitement over johnson. How many wickets in the top 6 has he managed?

He's just a poor man's Larwood.

^^
Whinge after whinge, moan after moan...............

Be thankful our captain was generous in letting you bat first (even though you still mucked it up).

Bomber wrote:^^
Whinge after whinge, moan after moan...............

Be thankful our captain was generous in letting you bat first (even though you still mucked it up).

how is that a whinge or a moan? I don't think you convicts actually understand the meaning of the word, prob

"best batsmen in the world" shouldering arms

Best performance of the series so far from a pom, well done Piers Morgan

predator wrote:Best performance of the series so far from a pom, well done Piers Morgan

6 balls, not a legal delivery amongst them. Nothing changes really. Couldn't even get out a newpaper editor.

God is an Englishman wrote:

predator wrote:Best performance of the series so far from a pom, well done Piers Morgan

Couldn't even get out a newpaper editor.

Would have done if he was bowling against one

predator wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

predator wrote:Best performance of the series so far from a pom, well done Piers Morgan

Couldn't even get out a newpaper editor.

Would have done if he was bowling against one

Well he couldn't get out an ex editor, so why do you think he could have got a current one?

On that display he couldn't have bowled out my son.

God is an Englishman wrote:
On that display he couldn't have bowled out my son.

All balls delivered with accuracy, five at Morgan and one smashing the wickets, thats show business

predator wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:
On that display he couldn't have bowled out my son.

All balls delivered with accuracy, five at Morgan and one smashing the wickets, thats show business

and not one of them was a legal delivery. Each one a front foot NO BALL. You don't get wickets with no balls.

God is an Englishman wrote:

predator wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:
On that display he couldn't have bowled out my son.

All balls delivered with accuracy, five at Morgan and one smashing the wickets, thats show business

and not one of them was a legal delivery. Each one a front foot NO BALL. You don't get wickets with no balls.

your starting to sound very sad now, maybe you can point us in the direction of the vision that shows all 6 no balls, there's only vision of 2 delivery's being no balls

predator wrote: your starting to sound very sad now, maybe you can point us in the direction of the vision that shows all 6 no balls, there's only vision of 2 delivery's being no balls

Happy to point you in the direction of the vision, it was on Channel 9 and Sky Sports. I will admit I made an assumption that the 2 balls that you couldn't see were the same as the 4 that you could.

They were BIG no balls as well. Balls, 1, 2 & 3 you can see clear as day were BIG no balls. Ball 5 the commentators said it was.

On that display he couldn't have bowled out my son.[/quote]

All balls delivered with accuracy, five at Morgan and one smashing the wickets, thats show business[/quote]


and not one of them was a legal delivery. Each one a front foot NO BALL. You don't get wickets with no balls.[/quote]

your starting to sound very sad now, maybe you can point us in the direction of the vision that shows all 6 no balls, there's only vision of 2 delivery's being no balls[/quote]


Starting to sad now you reckon, where have you been the last 4 years!!!!!!!

Rookie wrote:Starting to sad now you reckon, where have you been the last 4 years!!!!!!!

typical convict really, being correct is sad

Wake me up when there's some interesting banter.

Glimt I Øyet wrote:Wake me up when there's some interesting banter.

New user name coming? Rip Van Winkle?

God is an Englishman wrote:

and not one of them was a legal delivery. Each one a front foot NO BALL. You don't get wickets with no balls.

YES YOU CAN

God is an Englishman wrote:

Rookie wrote:Starting to sad now you reckon, where have you been the last 4 years!!!!!!!

typical convict really, being correct is sad

Typical stinking fûcken pom, being you is sad

God is an Englishman wrote:

predator wrote: your starting to sound very sad now, maybe you can point us in the direction of the vision that shows all 6 no balls, there's only vision of 2 delivery's being no balls

Happy to point you in the direction of the vision, it was on Channel 9 and Sky Sports. I will admit I made an assumption that the 2 balls that you couldn't see were the same as the 4 that you could.

They were BIG no balls as well. Balls, 1, 2 & 3 you can see clear as day were BIG no balls. Ball 5 the commentators said it was.

In that case he should have re-bowled the no balls. I bet Morgan didnt care that there werent any more.
PS - you need a new captain, Cook is laughable.

A little tail wag helps.....

Wicket looks like it may be more batsman friendly for next three days, oddly enough. Can see england making 350, setting us around 400, which would be gettable.

England were 60/0 when I left the house earlier. I didn't expect them to be nine down by the time I got home. 230 for victory shouldn't be that hard for australia to achieve,

Bomber wrote:Can see england making 350

Tell him he's dreaming!

bloodypassit wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

and not one of them was a legal delivery. Each one a front foot NO BALL. You don't get wickets with no balls.

YES YOU CAN

please tell me how a bowler can get a wicket with a no ball.

standard convict cheating from brad haddin today.

God is an Englishman wrote:

bloodypassit wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

and not one of them was a legal delivery. Each one a front foot NO BALL. You don't get wickets with no balls.

YES YOU CAN

please tell me how a bowler can get a wicket with a no ball.

Mitchell Johnson...this Ashes series (wasn't looked at by the Umpires ) !

God is an Englishman wrote:standard convict appealing from brad haddin today.

fixed that quote for you ;)

Why is a yorker called a yorker?