Mexico vs south Africa
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, ruud, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
- Outlaw 2.0
- Star Player
- Posts: 4343
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:57 pm
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
pienaars feet were in play so it shouldnt have been taken away.Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Robbed! No way was that offside
very good game nevertheless, attacking play from both sides. you can see the effort the south africans are putting in to win it. the atmosphere is showing in them.
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
firstly who gives a shiraz.Crocodiles wrote:Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
secondly, wasent offside where an attacker recieves a ball 'behind' the last defender when its kicked or interferes with the balls trajectory? that defender being peinaar... or have the rules changed again?... :?
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
You have to have two defenders in front of you to not be offside. Usually one is the keeper (but doesn't have to be). In this case he only had the defender on the line in from of him. He was closer to the goal line than the keeper so who is the second defender playing him onside?FPV #18 wrote:firstly who gives a shiraz.Crocodiles wrote:Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
secondly, wasent offside where an attacker recieves a ball 'behind' the last defender when its kicked or interferes with the balls trajectory? that defender being peinaar... or have the rules changed again?... :?
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
- Outlaw 2.0
- Star Player
- Posts: 4343
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:57 pm
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
I question your knowledge of the offside law if you think that wasn't. Have you actually played the game?Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Robbed! No way was that offside
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
well thats just stupid and causes an unnessacary amount of confusion. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a defender goes behind him?... :?Crocodiles wrote:You have to have two defenders in front of you to not be offside. Usually one is the keeper (but doesn't have to be). In this case he only had the defender on the line in from of him. He was closer to the goal line than the keeper so who is the second defender playing him onside?FPV #18 wrote:firstly who gives a shiraz.Crocodiles wrote:Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
secondly, wasent offside where an attacker recieves a ball 'behind' the last defender when its kicked or interferes with the balls trajectory? that defender being peinaar... or have the rules changed again?... :?
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
Hawkesy wrote:I question your knowledge of the offside law if you think that wasn't. Have you actually played the game?Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Robbed! No way was that offside
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
Unnecessary confusion is players not knowing the rules disputing decisions. You have to have to be inline with the second last defender to be onside. They don't have to be the keeper but one usually is. In this case he wasn't.FPV #18 wrote:well thats just stupid and causes an unnessacary amount of confusion. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a defender goes behind him?... :?
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
how is it confusing?FPV #18 wrote:well thats just stupid and causes an unnessacary amount of confusion. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a defender goes behind him?... :?
You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is played (with a few exceptions), it says nothing about the positions they play, they could be the striker and the right midfielder.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
No. As Hawkesy said You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is playedFPV #18 wrote:ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??Crocodiles wrote:No. As Hawkesy said You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is playedFPV #18 wrote:ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
Easiest way, forget the keeper. 2 OPPOSITION PLAYERS!!FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??Crocodiles wrote:No. As Hawkesy said You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is playedFPV #18 wrote:ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
Crocodiles wrote:God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
you mean you're not supposed to just stand there 2 abreast blocking the way for people who aren't lazy.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
i see the rule twat. im merely stating that its stupid that the keeper can come into play for the offside rule. it should stick to the 10 outfield players.Crocodiles wrote:God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
You're the one making an issue of the keeper. We are saying it doesn't matter who the two players are.FPV #18 wrote:i see the rule twat. im merely stating that its stupid that the keeper can come into play for the offside rule. it should stick to the 10 outfield players.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
FPV #18 wrote:i see the rule twat. im merely stating that its stupid that the keeper can come into play for the offside rule. it should stick to the 10 outfield players.Crocodiles wrote:God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
clearly you don't.
It's simple 2 players, do you want it to be 1 plus the keeper or should it now be 2 outfield players or just 1 outfield player. What happens when the keeper goes up for a corner?
It's not stupid, it's perfectly clear. 2 OPPOSITION PLAYERS! I despair I really do, and you'll probably tell a ref he got a decision wrong tomorrow as well.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Colossus: One House
Costa: One Lunch
Oh and add in
Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
Southern Knights SC - 2019 - Celebrating 25 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
thats what i was stipulating before.Hawkesy wrote:It's simple 2 players, do you want it to be 1 plus the keeper or should it now be 2 outfield players or just 1 outfield player. What happens when the keeper goes up for a corner?
It's not stupid, it's perfectly clear. 2 OPPOSITION PLAYERS! I despair I really do, and you'll probably tell a ref he got a decision wrong tomorrow as well.
and if 2 players are ther its onside.
and why would i be playing tomoro??
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
On the general basis quite often when players whinge to referees/linesmen about decisions it's more often a case of players not knowing the rules than officials fuc*ing up.FPV #18 wrote:and why would i be playing tomoro??
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
major failCrocodiles wrote:On the general basis quite often when players whinge to referees/linesmen about decisions it's more often a case of players not knowing the rules than officials fuc*ing up.FPV #18 wrote:and why would i be playing tomoro??
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
We've already established you don't know the rules and disputed a decision because of it.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
ok kid, u keep ur dream land status... :?Crocodiles wrote:We've already established you don't know the rules and disputed a decision because of it.
- Crocodiles
- Apprentice
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am
Re: Mexico vs south Africa
Keep digging that hole.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string