Mexico vs south Africa

The forum is for discussion of club football outside Australia and national team football Please do not post any offensive or malicious comments.

Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, ruud, Judge Judy, Forum Admins

User avatar
Outlaw 2.0
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4343
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:57 pm

Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Outlaw 2.0 »

Robbed! No way was that offside
Image
HA'WAY THE LADS

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Robbed! No way was that offside
pienaars feet were in play so it shouldnt have been taken away.

very good game nevertheless, attacking play from both sides. you can see the effort the south africans are putting in to win it. the atmosphere is showing in them.
Image

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
Steve#4
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 9865
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:05 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Steve#4 »

Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Robbed! No way was that offside
Offside :D

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Crocodiles wrote:Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
firstly who gives a shiraz.
secondly, wasent offside where an attacker recieves a ball 'behind' the last defender when its kicked or interferes with the balls trajectory? that defender being peinaar... or have the rules changed again?... :?
Image

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

south africa 1-0, good team goal.
Image

User avatar
Steve#4
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 9865
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 3:05 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Steve#4 »

Feel good moment

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

FPV #18 wrote:
Crocodiles wrote:Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
firstly who gives a shiraz.
secondly, wasent offside where an attacker recieves a ball 'behind' the last defender when its kicked or interferes with the balls trajectory? that defender being peinaar... or have the rules changed again?... :?
You have to have two defenders in front of you to not be offside. Usually one is the keeper (but doesn't have to be). In this case he only had the defender on the line in from of him. He was closer to the goal line than the keeper so who is the second defender playing him onside?
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
Outlaw 2.0
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4343
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 1:57 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Outlaw 2.0 »

$86 to the good come on the rest of my bets!
Image
HA'WAY THE LADS

User avatar
Hawkesy
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 16451
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:02 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Hawkesy »

Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Robbed! No way was that offside
I question your knowledge of the offside law if you think that wasn't. Have you actually played the game?
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:

Colossus: One House

Costa: One Lunch

Oh and add in

Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Crocodiles wrote:
FPV #18 wrote:
Crocodiles wrote:Firstly it's South Africa v Mexico.
Secondly it was offside - learn your rules.
firstly who gives a shiraz.
secondly, wasent offside where an attacker recieves a ball 'behind' the last defender when its kicked or interferes with the balls trajectory? that defender being peinaar... or have the rules changed again?... :?
You have to have two defenders in front of you to not be offside. Usually one is the keeper (but doesn't have to be). In this case he only had the defender on the line in from of him. He was closer to the goal line than the keeper so who is the second defender playing him onside?
well thats just stupid and causes an unnessacary amount of confusion. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a defender goes behind him?... :?
Image

User avatar
Blotto
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 5578
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:06 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Blotto »

Hawkesy wrote:
Outlaw 2.0 wrote:Robbed! No way was that offside
I question your knowledge of the offside law if you think that wasn't. Have you actually played the game?

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

FPV #18 wrote:well thats just stupid and causes an unnessacary amount of confusion. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a defender goes behind him?... :?
Unnecessary confusion is players not knowing the rules disputing decisions. You have to have to be inline with the second last defender to be onside. They don't have to be the keeper but one usually is. In this case he wasn't.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
Hawkesy
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 16451
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:02 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Hawkesy »

FPV #18 wrote:well thats just stupid and causes an unnessacary amount of confusion. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a defender goes behind him?... :?
how is it confusing?

You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is played (with a few exceptions), it says nothing about the positions they play, they could be the striker and the right midfielder.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:

Colossus: One House

Costa: One Lunch

Oh and add in

Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
Image

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

FPV #18 wrote:ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
No. As Hawkesy said You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is played
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Crocodiles wrote:
FPV #18 wrote:ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
No. As Hawkesy said You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is played
so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
Image

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
Hawkesy
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 16451
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:02 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Hawkesy »

FPV #18 wrote:
Crocodiles wrote:
FPV #18 wrote:ok. so does the keeper automatically become an outfield player once a right midfielder or striker goes behind him?
No. As Hawkesy said You have to have 2 opposition players between you and the goal line when the ball is played
so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
Easiest way, forget the keeper. 2 OPPOSITION PLAYERS!!
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:

Colossus: One House

Costa: One Lunch

Oh and add in

Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".

User avatar
Hawkesy
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 16451
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:02 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Hawkesy »

Crocodiles wrote:
FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.

you mean you're not supposed to just stand there 2 abreast blocking the way for people who aren't lazy.
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:

Colossus: One House

Costa: One Lunch

Oh and add in

Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Crocodiles wrote:
FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.
i see the rule twat. im merely stating that its stupid that the keeper can come into play for the offside rule. it should stick to the 10 outfield players.
Image

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

FPV #18 wrote:i see the rule twat. im merely stating that its stupid that the keeper can come into play for the offside rule. it should stick to the 10 outfield players.
You're the one making an issue of the keeper. We are saying it doesn't matter who the two players are.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
Hawkesy
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 16451
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:02 pm

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Hawkesy »

FPV #18 wrote:
Crocodiles wrote:
FPV #18 wrote:so off a cross, and the keeper misses it, if 2 defenders are on the goal line its onside, 1 defender its offside??
God it's like trying to teach Australians escalator etiquette.
i see the rule twat. im merely stating that its stupid that the keeper can come into play for the offside rule. it should stick to the 10 outfield players.

clearly you don't.

It's simple 2 players, do you want it to be 1 plus the keeper or should it now be 2 outfield players or just 1 outfield player. What happens when the keeper goes up for a corner?

It's not stupid, it's perfectly clear. 2 OPPOSITION PLAYERS! I despair I really do, and you'll probably tell a ref he got a decision wrong tomorrow as well. :lol:
Things I am owed because they're too tight to pay up:

Colossus: One House

Costa: One Lunch

Oh and add in

Colossus: one photo and one letter from his "attorney".

User avatar
swannsong
Technical Director
Technical Director
Posts: 30001
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by swannsong »

Image
Southern Knights SC - 2019 - Celebrating 25 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Hawkesy wrote:It's simple 2 players, do you want it to be 1 plus the keeper or should it now be 2 outfield players or just 1 outfield player. What happens when the keeper goes up for a corner?
It's not stupid, it's perfectly clear. 2 OPPOSITION PLAYERS! I despair I really do, and you'll probably tell a ref he got a decision wrong tomorrow as well. :lol:
thats what i was stipulating before.
and if 2 players are ther its onside.
and why would i be playing tomoro??
Image

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

FPV #18 wrote:and why would i be playing tomoro??
On the general basis quite often when players whinge to referees/linesmen about decisions it's more often a case of players not knowing the rules than officials fuc*ing up.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Crocodiles wrote:
FPV #18 wrote:and why would i be playing tomoro??
On the general basis quite often when players whinge to referees/linesmen about decisions it's more often a case of players not knowing the rules than officials fuc*ing up.
major fail :lol:
Image

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

We've already established you don't know the rules and disputed a decision because of it.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

User avatar
# 9
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4698
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:13 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by # 9 »

Crocodiles wrote:We've already established you don't know the rules and disputed a decision because of it.
ok kid, u keep ur dream land status... :?
Image

User avatar
Crocodiles
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:12 am

Re: Mexico vs south Africa

Post by Crocodiles »

Keep digging that hole.
There's people rolling around on the carpet, biting wool and pulling string

Post Reply