Ashes 21/22
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:07 pmWhat did I deflect?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 2:52 pmClassic Cooper deflection.
Go ahead and show the definition of "assumption" that you are using.
a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.
"they made certain assumptions about the market"
That should do it.
You deflected by asking "What can I do for you" when you knew exactly what was asked.
Your definition doesn't make sense though as nothing I said was an assumption.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
So when you do it it's deflection too I guess, when you know the question or statement is directed at you?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 8:49 pmCooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:07 pmWhat did I deflect?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 2:52 pmClassic Cooper deflection.
Go ahead and show the definition of "assumption" that you are using.
a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.
"they made certain assumptions about the market"
That should do it.
You deflected by asking "What can I do for you" when you knew exactly what was asked.
Your definition doesn't make sense though as nothing I said was an assumption.
Everything you have said is an assumption since you do not know me or know what I know. You've assumed a lot not matter what you say. Try again lol
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Its not an assumption as you've provided the evidence.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:41 pmSo when you do it it's deflection too I guess, when you know the question or statement is directed at you?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 8:49 pmCooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:07 pmWhat did I deflect?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 2:52 pmClassic Cooper deflection.
Go ahead and show the definition of "assumption" that you are using.
a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.
"they made certain assumptions about the market"
That should do it.
You deflected by asking "What can I do for you" when you knew exactly what was asked.
Your definition doesn't make sense though as nothing I said was an assumption.
Everything you have said is an assumption since you do not know me or know what I know. You've assumed a lot not matter what you say. Try again lol
The deflection was "What can I do for you?" Not the asking who it was for. Please pay attention.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
As said, you have assumed a lot. You can't say you haven't as you don't know what I know etcGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:23 pmIts not an assumption as you've provided the evidence.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:41 pmSo when you do it it's deflection too I guess, when you know the question or statement is directed at you?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 8:49 pmCooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:07 pmWhat did I deflect?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 2:52 pmClassic Cooper deflection.
Go ahead and show the definition of "assumption" that you are using.
a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.
"they made certain assumptions about the market"
That should do it.
You deflected by asking "What can I do for you" when you knew exactly what was asked.
Your definition doesn't make sense though as nothing I said was an assumption.
Everything you have said is an assumption since you do not know me or know what I know. You've assumed a lot not matter what you say. Try again lol
The deflection was "What can I do for you?" Not the asking who it was for. Please pay attention.
You seem to have missed the question.
Try again lol
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
You must have missed where I clearly showed you that your basis was based on the false premise. Please pay attention of you want to try and keep up with me.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:30 pmAs said, you have assumed a lot. You can't say you haven't as you don't know what I know etcGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:23 pmIts not an assumption as you've provided the evidence.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:41 pmSo when you do it it's deflection too I guess, when you know the question or statement is directed at you?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 8:49 pmCooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:07 pmWhat did I deflect?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 2:52 pm
Classic Cooper deflection.
Go ahead and show the definition of "assumption" that you are using.
a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.
"they made certain assumptions about the market"
That should do it.
You deflected by asking "What can I do for you" when you knew exactly what was asked.
Your definition doesn't make sense though as nothing I said was an assumption.
Everything you have said is an assumption since you do not know me or know what I know. You've assumed a lot not matter what you say. Try again lol
The deflection was "What can I do for you?" Not the asking who it was for. Please pay attention.
You seem to have missed the question.
Try again lol
I repeat, I haven't assumed anything as you have provided evidence.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
What's bias (which i didnt have) got to do with anything? Deflecting again.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:57 amYou must have missed where I clearly showed you that your basis was based on the false premise. Please pay attention of you want to try and keep up with me.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:30 pmAs said, you have assumed a lot. You can't say you haven't as you don't know what I know etcGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:23 pmIts not an assumption as you've provided the evidence.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:41 pmSo when you do it it's deflection too I guess, when you know the question or statement is directed at you?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 8:49 pm
You deflected by asking "What can I do for you" when you knew exactly what was asked.
Your definition doesn't make sense though as nothing I said was an assumption.
Everything you have said is an assumption since you do not know me or know what I know. You've assumed a lot not matter what you say. Try again lol
The deflection was "What can I do for you?" Not the asking who it was for. Please pay attention.
You seem to have missed the question.
Try again lol
I repeat, I haven't assumed anything as you have provided evidence.
Already shown you were assuming so thats done.
Your hypocrisy and deflection is hilarious, was a simple yes or no question which you still have failed to answer.
Carey will be selected so you were wrong there as well lol.
Try again next time lol
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Cooper wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:14 amWhat's bias (which i didnt have) got to do with anything? Deflecting again.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:57 amYou must have missed where I clearly showed you that your basis was based on the false premise. Please pay attention of you want to try and keep up with me.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:30 pmAs said, you have assumed a lot. You can't say you haven't as you don't know what I know etcGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:23 pmIts not an assumption as you've provided the evidence.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 10:41 pmSo when you do it it's deflection too I guess, when you know the question or statement is directed at you?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 8:49 pm
You deflected by asking "What can I do for you" when you knew exactly what was asked.
Your definition doesn't make sense though as nothing I said was an assumption.
Everything you have said is an assumption since you do not know me or know what I know. You've assumed a lot not matter what you say. Try again lol
The deflection was "What can I do for you?" Not the asking who it was for. Please pay attention.
You seem to have missed the question.
Try again lol
I repeat, I haven't assumed anything as you have provided evidence.
Already shown you were assuming so thats done.
Your hypocrisy and deflection is hilarious, was a simple yes or no question which you still have failed to answer.
Carey will be selected so you were wrong there as well lol.
Try again next time lol
You're the only one who has mentioned bias.
It's not possible to answer your question as it was based on a false premise.
Are you now deflecting by just making things up?
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:22 amWas a misread lolCooper wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:14 amWhat's bias (which i didnt have) got to do with anything? Deflecting again.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:57 amYou must have missed where I clearly showed you that your basis was based on the false premise. Please pay attention of you want to try and keep up with me.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:30 pmAs said, you have assumed a lot. You can't say you haven't as you don't know what I know etcGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:23 pmIts not an assumption as you've provided the evidence.
The deflection was "What can I do for you?" Not the asking who it was for. Please pay attention.
You seem to have missed the question.
Try again lol
I repeat, I haven't assumed anything as you have provided evidence.
Already shown you were assuming so thats done.
Your hypocrisy and deflection is hilarious, was a simple yes or no question which you still have failed to answer.
Carey will be selected so you were wrong there as well lol.
Try again next time lol
You're the only one who has mentioned bias.
It's not possible to answer your question as it was based on a false premise.
Are you now deflecting by just making things up?
No defection needed by me, that's your domain lol
It's ok that you don't want to answer it cause it will show your hypocrisy and we know you cant have that lol
You lost, and got it wrong as usual. Better luck next time.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Cooper wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:33 amIf you show me where I claimed you were deflecting because you didn't know the question was for you then I will be able to answer.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:22 amWas a misread lolCooper wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:14 amWhat's bias (which i didnt have) got to do with anything? Deflecting again.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:57 amYou must have missed where I clearly showed you that your basis was based on the false premise. Please pay attention of you want to try and keep up with me.Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:30 pmAs said, you have assumed a lot. You can't say you haven't as you don't know what I know etcGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 11:23 pm
Its not an assumption as you've provided the evidence.
The deflection was "What can I do for you?" Not the asking who it was for. Please pay attention.
You seem to have missed the question.
Try again lol
I repeat, I haven't assumed anything as you have provided evidence.
Already shown you were assuming so thats done.
Your hypocrisy and deflection is hilarious, was a simple yes or no question which you still have failed to answer.
Carey will be selected so you were wrong there as well lol.
Try again next time lol
You're the only one who has mentioned bias.
It's not possible to answer your question as it was based on a false premise.
Are you now deflecting by just making things up?
No defection needed by me, that's your domain lol
It's ok that you don't want to answer it cause it will show your hypocrisy and we know you cant have that lol
You lost, and got it wrong as usual. Better luck next time.
These are some of my easiest wins. You even admit you got it wrong above.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
As said many times everything you said above has been an assumption. I guess as usual you struggle to read lol
You can keep deflecting as much as you want I really don't care. You lost and as usual your trying to dig your way out of the hole.
NMP you can't admit it. Better luck next time.
I hope the Carey does a great job and helps Australia beat England in the Ashes.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Name just one assumption. Should be easy as apparently it's everything.Cooper wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:52 amAs said many times everything you said above has been an assumption. I guess as usual you struggle to read lol
You can keep deflecting as much as you want I really don't care. You lost and as usual your trying to dig your way out of the hole.
NMP you can't admit it. Better luck next time.
I hope the Carey does a great job and helps Australia beat England in the Ashes.
Do you think Everton won tonight?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 9:40 am
If you show me where I claimed you were deflecting because you didn't know the question was for you then I will be able to answer.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
nup , aussies to win 2-1 with couple draws probably due to weatherBomber wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 1:17 pm Ok, I'll pipe in given we aren't far away from day one of the first test.
If I had to bet, I'd actually punt for a drawn series again, meaning Australia will retain the ashes, maybe another 2-2.
In our favour: home grounds, fairly experienced team (even though starting eleven not yet known)
In england favour: more recent test match cricket, settled captain
Winning the toss will be a big advantage so a lot may depend on who gets the luck of the flip.
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60423
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
I'd take that and hope you're right!Just Dave now wrote: ↑Thu Dec 02, 2021 10:29 amnup , aussies to win 2-1 with couple draws probably due to weatherBomber wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 1:17 pm Ok, I'll pipe in given we aren't far away from day one of the first test.
If I had to bet, I'd actually punt for a drawn series again, meaning Australia will retain the ashes, maybe another 2-2.
In our favour: home grounds, fairly experienced team (even though starting eleven not yet known)
In england favour: more recent test match cricket, settled captain
Winning the toss will be a big advantage so a lot may depend on who gets the luck of the flip.
Ignore this signature
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60423
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Carey and Head in. I'm right again.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 4:25 pmWe'll see. Carey still a chance for keeper's job, Usman would be very lucky indeedGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:19 pmIll fitting hat.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:10 pmIll itting hat? Translation please.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:33 pmBomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:06 amSmith I can understand, Cummins is an interesting one. I guess you have to try and put the captain off somehow. I assume he will be fielding at mid-off or mid-on most of the time from now on so at least he'll be closer to the crowd than the slips cordon.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:59 am
The Barmy Army gave actually made a statement that Paine should not be targetted by England fans because of the mental health aspect.
Already heard some good one for Smith and Cummins though.![]()
If you were the Ill itting hat then you are fair game.
How funny it will be if you play ingles, Khawaja and laubasagne.
Doubt the first two will get picked but who knows
Did you realise Paine is out? Ingles in next cab off the rank to take the gloves.
Khawaja a reasonable chance of playing in the middle order as well.
![Wink ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Will this stop the whingeing from south australians that their players never get picked?Bomber wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:32 pmCarey and Head in. I'm right again.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 4:25 pmWe'll see. Carey still a chance for keeper's job, Usman would be very lucky indeedGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:19 pmIll fitting hat.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:10 pmIll itting hat? Translation please.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:33 pm
If you were the Ill itting hat then you are fair game.
How funny it will be if you play ingles, Khawaja and laubasagne.
Doubt the first two will get picked but who knows
Did you realise Paine is out? Ingles in next cab off the rank to take the gloves.
Khawaja a reasonable chance of playing in the middle order as well.![]()
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Got anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:39 pmWill this stop the whingeing from south australians that their players never get picked?Bomber wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:32 pmCarey and Head in. I'm right again.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 4:25 pmWe'll see. Carey still a chance for keeper's job, Usman would be very lucky indeedGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:19 pmIll fitting hat.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:10 pmIll itting hat? Translation please.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:33 pm
If you were the Ill itting hat then you are fair game.
How funny it will be if you play ingles, Khawaja and laubasagne.
Doubt the first two will get picked but who knows
Did you realise Paine is out? Ingles in next cab off the rank to take the gloves.
Khawaja a reasonable chance of playing in the middle order as well.![]()
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Yes, the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:37 pmGot anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:39 pmWill this stop the whingeing from south australians that their players never get picked?Bomber wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:32 pmCarey and Head in. I'm right again.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 4:25 pmWe'll see. Carey still a chance for keeper's job, Usman would be very lucky indeedGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:19 pmIll fitting hat.
Did you realise Paine is out? Ingles in next cab off the rank to take the gloves.
Khawaja a reasonable chance of playing in the middle order as well.![]()
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Got anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 7:13 pmYes, the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:37 pmGot anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:39 pmWill this stop the whingeing from south australians that their players never get picked?Bomber wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:32 pmCarey and Head in. I'm right again.Bomber wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 4:25 pmWe'll see. Carey still a chance for keeper's job, Usman would be very lucky indeedGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:19 pm
Ill fitting hat.
Did you realise Paine is out? Ingles in next cab off the rank to take the gloves.
Khawaja a reasonable chance of playing in the middle order as well.![]()
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Yes, the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:46 pmGot anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 7:13 pmYes, the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:37 pmGot anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:39 pmWill this stop the whingeing from south australians that their players never get picked?
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
Your opinion is noted but I asked you to backup your original statement, show evidence to backup your statement.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:14 pmYes, the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:46 pmGot anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 7:13 pmYes, the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:37 pmGot anything to backup these allegations of whingeing South Australians that you speak of?God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:39 pmWill this stop the whingeing from south australians that their players never get picked?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
The evidence is the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.
Back up has been shown, you may not agree with it butbweve established you don't really know much about cricket.
Have you decided which days you are going to the test match?
I'll show you some more evidence tomorrow so I can laugh at you some more.
Back up has been shown, you may not agree with it butbweve established you don't really know much about cricket.
Have you decided which days you are going to the test match?
I'll show you some more evidence tomorrow so I can laugh at you some more.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
So still just your opinion and word which we know means nothing.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:34 pm The evidence is the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.
Back up has been shown, you may not agree with it butbweve established you don't really know much about cricket.
Have you decided which days you are going to the test match?
I'll show you some more evidence tomorrow so I can laugh at you some more.
You've assumed my cricket knowledge thats it, no proof of your assumptions.
I'll answer yours if you eventually answer mine.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
You have provided the proof, assumptions were not needed.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:43 pmSo still just your opinion and word which we know means nothing.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:34 pm The evidence is the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.
Back up has been shown, you may not agree with it butbweve established you don't really know much about cricket.
Have you decided which days you are going to the test match?
I'll show you some more evidence tomorrow so I can laugh at you some more.
You've assumed my cricket knowledge thats it, no proof of your assumptions.
I'll answer yours if you eventually answer mine.
It's not just an opinion, I've seen it and heard it. However, when I provide the proof you will claim it isn't proof. You may even join in the whingeing. That would make me laugh at you even more than I currently do.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4327
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:03 amYou have provided the proof, assumptions were not needed.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:43 pmSo still just your opinion and word which we know means nothing.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:34 pm The evidence is the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.
Back up has been shown, you may not agree with it butbweve established you don't really know much about cricket.
Have you decided which days you are going to the test match?
I'll show you some more evidence tomorrow so I can laugh at you some more.
You've assumed my cricket knowledge thats it, no proof of your assumptions.
I'll answer yours if you eventually answer mine.
It's not just an opinion, I've seen it and heard it. However, when I provide the proof you will claim it isn't proof. You may even join in the whingeing. That would make me laugh at you even more than I currently do.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
A classic case of "cause i said so" by yourself, not the first time.
Better luck next time, keep up the predictability. Cant wait till the next time you get shutdown and we all laugh at you some more.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Ashes 21/22
You have had it explained to you many times. If you truly followed cricket then you would know exactly what I am talking about.Cooper wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:34 amGod is an Englishman wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 9:03 amYou have provided the proof, assumptions were not needed.Cooper wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:43 pmSo still just your opinion and word which we know means nothing.God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:34 pm The evidence is the constant whingeing that NSW players get picked and SA's don't.
Back up has been shown, you may not agree with it butbweve established you don't really know much about cricket.
Have you decided which days you are going to the test match?
I'll show you some more evidence tomorrow so I can laugh at you some more.
You've assumed my cricket knowledge thats it, no proof of your assumptions.
I'll answer yours if you eventually answer mine.
It's not just an opinion, I've seen it and heard it. However, when I provide the proof you will claim it isn't proof. You may even join in the whingeing. That would make me laugh at you even more than I currently do.![]()
![]()
Still deflecting and dodging as usual i see. If you had proof you would have shown it by now.
A classic case of "cause i said so" by yourself, not the first time.
Better luck next time, keep up the predictability. Cant wait till the next time you get shutdown and we all laugh at you some more.
Sorry to disappoint you but you are not top of my priority list today.
In fact, you're near the bottom. Don't panic though, I'll get to you.