Liverpool v Tottenham

The forum is for discussion of club football outside Australia and national team football Please do not post any offensive or malicious comments.

Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, ruud, Judge Judy, Forum Admins

Post Reply
User avatar
It's An Injustice
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 8:52 pm

Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by It's An Injustice »

Is it on FTA? I couldn't find it in the tv guide.
What does the fox say?

predrag
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:28 pm
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by predrag »

Optus sports only as far as i know.

Old Master
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 7554
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:03 pm
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 34 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Old Master »

Well done to Liverpool with a 2 - 0 win over Spurs.

The penalty was a little harsh but was the correct decision given the modern game's accepted rulings.

Origi's goal though was well taken and demonstrated his improving talent.

The game itself wasn't the best Champion's League Final but did have a few moments of 'leaping from the seat' moments for both groups of supporters.
The older I get the better I was.


FOOTBALL IS LIFE
The Rest Is Just Details

predrag
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:28 pm
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by predrag »

Congratulations to all celebrating Liverpool fans,cautious approach did it this time,but who cares all people will see in future is 2018/19 champions on list.Good job on the spurs,amazing season .

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by God is an Englishman »

Better team lost but that's football. Never a penalty, what's the point in VAR if that still gets given.

2 champions league wins now for Liverpool and still no premier league.
Image

User avatar
Princess Princess
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 6:48 pm

Re: Tottenham v Liverpool

Post by Princess Princess »

Clear penalty.

Oh and it was Tottenham v Liverpool
Knight15 wrote:You are without doubt one of the weirdest people I have ever met

MegaBonus
Team Manager
Team Manager
Posts: 8852
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 89 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by MegaBonus »

damn globalisation.....was hoping to see a 'typically English' game between 2 teams coached by foreigners who taught their teams to play like English teams.......most boring final in living memory...
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill

predrag
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:28 pm
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by predrag »

How refreshing was it to see a good looking girl running across the field,instead of a drunk.With the new changes to the premier league rules,i am afraid awe will see a lot of penalties like this in future.

ozzie owl
Coach
Coach
Posts: 21778
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
Has thanked: 212 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by ozzie owl »

MegaBonus wrote:damn globalisation.....was hoping to see a 'typically English' game between 2 teams coached by foreigners who taught their teams to play like English teams.......most boring final in living memory...

Too right it was a dull game to watch and if that is the new ruling on penalties get ready for a flood of them next season in the EPL.

Nice One Cyril
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 19380
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Nice One Cyril »

ozzie owl wrote:
MegaBonus wrote:damn globalisation.....was hoping to see a 'typically English' game between 2 teams coached by foreigners who taught their teams to play like English teams.......most boring final in living memory...

Too right it was a dull game to watch and if that is the new ruling on penalties get ready for a flood of them next season in the EPL.
His arm was raised and, had it hit his arm directly, I think a penalty would have been the correct decision, but when it hits another part of your body, in this case his chest, and deflects onto your arm I'm not so sure it should be a penalty. The new season will be interesting I think.
Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk. :lol:
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower

User avatar
haywood djablowme
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 3340
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by haywood djablowme »

What's your thoughts on Kane starting Cryil??
SAASL SUNDAY PREMIER LEAGUE CHAMPION 2010 2011
SAASL CHALLENGE CUP WINNER 2008 2010 2011
SAASL CHAMPION OF CHAMPIONS WINNER 2010
SAASL CICHANOWSKI SHIELD WINNER 2009 2011 2012

Nice One Cyril
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 19380
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Nice One Cyril »

haywood djablowme wrote:What's your thoughts on Kane starting Cryil??
I think Poch was damned if he did and damned if he didn't. The trouble with the early pen is that any plans go out the window immediately, so it's hard to know which would have been right.

If Kane tells you he's fit, I guess you have to play him, but my personal opinion before the game was that we should have started with the players that beat Ajax. I didn't think Kane was the problem btw, Alli was poor and Eriksen was not great in the first half and when we had all the momentum in the second half, their keeper made a few decent stops.
Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk. :lol:
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Bomber »

Still knackered from the game and I didn't even play. :D
Ignore this signature

Nice One Cyril
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 19380
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:55 am
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Nice One Cyril »

Bomber wrote:Still knackered from the game and I didn't even play. :D
:lol: Yeah, me too. Disappointed obviously, but pleased with our season overall.

What did you think about the penalty? If it hits his arm directly I don't have a problem, shouldn't be waving to the crowd, but a ball that hits his chest then deflects and brushes the underside of his arm is a tough call. Seems that any touch on an arm away from the body is now a pen, so there's going to be a shed load of pens next year.
Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk. :lol:
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Bomber »

Nice One Cyril wrote:
Bomber wrote:Still knackered from the game and I didn't even play. :D
:lol: Yeah, me too. Disappointed obviously, but pleased with our season overall.

What did you think about the penalty? If it hits his arm directly I don't have a problem, shouldn't be waving to the crowd, but a ball that hits his chest then deflects and brushes the underside of his arm is a tough call. Seems that any touch on an arm away from the body is now a pen, so there's going to be a shed load of pens next year.
To be honest, its a classic case of neither 100% pen, nor 100% NOT a pen. Plenty have had time to dissect it, watch it on slow motion, and still you get two points of view. I'd lean slightly to it NOT being a pen but arm was struck, so there will always be conjecture.

Just glad, or more so relieved, that such a huge season got some reward for the Reds. :D
Ignore this signature

ozzie owl
Coach
Coach
Posts: 21778
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
Has thanked: 212 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by ozzie owl »

Nice One Cyril wrote:
Bomber wrote:Still knackered from the game and I didn't even play. :D
:lol: Yeah, me too. Disappointed obviously, but pleased with our season overall.

What did you think about the penalty? If it hits his arm directly I don't have a problem, shouldn't be waving to the crowd, but a ball that hits his chest then deflects and brushes the underside of his arm is a tough call. Seems that any touch on an arm away from the body is now a pen, so there's going to be a shed load of pens next year.
I agree NOC as a neutral I thought no penalty , however as you said we should now see a flood of penalties next season if that is the new interpretation.

User avatar
Michael
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Michael »

It wasn't an exciting game to watch, but most finals are not.
Not a penalty for me, VAR???

Better team didn't win, but so glad that Salah finally gets his medal, that he was so cruelly robbed last year!! Ramos your a dirty thug!

Liverpool haven't won the EPL since 1992
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.

eagleboy
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4290
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:34 pm
Has thanked: 274 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by eagleboy »

Michael wrote:It wasn't an exciting game to watch, but most finals are not.
Not a penalty for me, VAR???

Better team didn't win, but so glad that Salah finally gets his medal, that he was so cruelly robbed last year!! Ramos your a dirty thug!

Liverpool haven't won the EPL since 1992[/b]
Trying telling MU that

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by God is an Englishman »

Michael wrote:
Liverpool haven't won the EPL since 1992
So never then.
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Bomber »

Didn't know English football only started in the early 1990's.
Ignore this signature

predrag
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1307
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:28 pm
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by predrag »

1989-90 season was the last time Liverpool won 1st division,never winning the new EPL.

eagleboy
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 4290
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:34 pm
Has thanked: 274 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by eagleboy »

Bomber wrote:Didn't know English football only started in the early 1990's.
They have never taken to the EPL.The comp was too hard for them. :D Were dominant in the old first division 70s and 80s.

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Bomber »

eagleboy wrote:
Bomber wrote:Didn't know English football only started in the early 1990's.
They have never taken to the EPL.The comp was too hard for them. :D Were dominant in the old first division 70s and 80s.
That's when proper English football was being played and most players were Brits. Also variety of pitch conditions, no private ownership etc. :)
Ignore this signature

User avatar
Michael
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Michael »

Bomber wrote:
eagleboy wrote:
Bomber wrote:Didn't know English football only started in the early 1990's.
They have never taken to the EPL.The comp was too hard for them. :D Were dominant in the old first division 70s and 80s.
That's when proper English football was being played and most players were Brits. Also variety of pitch conditions, no private ownership etc. :)

if it wasnt for foreign ownership, you can deduct a few trophies that you have recently won.
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Bomber »

Michael wrote: if it wasnt for foreign ownership, you can deduct a few trophies that you have recently won.
If it wasn't for foreign ownership, Chelsea would probably still be broke, Man City just an ordinary side as they were prior.........
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:
Michael wrote: if it wasnt for foreign ownership, you can deduct a few trophies that you have recently won.
If it wasn't for foreign ownership, Chelsea would probably still be broke, Man City just an ordinary side as they were prior.........

No, Harding came in before the Russian.
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Liverpool v Tottenham

Post by Bomber »

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
Michael wrote: if it wasnt for foreign ownership, you can deduct a few trophies that you have recently won.
If it wasn't for foreign ownership, Chelsea would probably still be broke, Man City just an ordinary side as they were prior.........

No, Harding came in before the Russian.
Point being you can't say what we would have nor wouldn't have won without foreign ownership, as it applies to many big clubs (even not so big clubs) who have won trophies in recent history.
Ignore this signature

Post Reply