Aus v India - test series
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Lol, India will still win
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- Stitch This
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 11902
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Pujara given out three times in an innings - three successful reviews. Is that some kind of record or just shit umpiring?
Time for some righteous indignation
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Long wants England to get the #1 ranking.Stitch This wrote:Pujara given out three times in an innings - three successful reviews. Is that some kind of record or just shit umpiring?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
CheatsGod is an Englishman wrote:Long wants England to get the #1 ranking.Stitch This wrote:Pujara given out three times in an innings - three successful reviews. Is that some kind of record or just shit umpiring?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
How so?Bomber wrote:CheatsGod is an Englishman wrote:Long wants England to get the #1 ranking.Stitch This wrote:Pujara given out three times in an innings - three successful reviews. Is that some kind of record or just shit umpiring?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
One of them was my best subject.Bomber wrote:English and Maths not your strong points?
How so?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
An umpire "wanting England to be #1", who happens to be a pom and giving 3 outs that weren't? Sounds fishy enough!God is an Englishman wrote:One of them was my best subject.Bomber wrote:English and Maths not your strong points?
How so?
Ignore this signature
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Oh well, went down by 31 runs. Competitive and another AO classic test, but now on to Perth which will probably be our best hope of a win
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Bomber wrote:An umpire "wanting England to be #1", who happens to be a pom and giving 3 outs that weren't? Sounds fishy enough!God is an Englishman wrote:One of them was my best subject.Bomber wrote:English and Maths not your strong points?
How so?
I like how you assume that just because your team was involved in an entire team of cheats (sorry just the leadership group) that other teams are as well. the comment said, Llong wanted them to win, nothingbtindo with a country cheating.
Had to you said cheat, your point would have been valid as it would have been singular. Was it your English or your maths that let you down?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Collusion. Look it up. Infers plural hence cheatS.God is an Englishman wrote:
I like how you assume that just because your team was involved in an entire team of cheats (sorry just the leadership group) that other teams are as well. the comment said, Llong wanted them to win, nothingbtindo with a country cheating.
Had to you said cheat, your point would have been valid as it would have been singular. Was it your English or your maths that let you down?
Gee imagine if an Aussie umpire did similar. There'd be a whole new topic dedicated to it by now.
Ironic that India, hater of DRS, was saved by it.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
They weren't "saved by it", the right decisions were made because of it.Bomber wrote:Collusion. Look it up. Infers plural hence cheatS.God is an Englishman wrote:
I like how you assume that just because your team was involved in an entire team of cheats (sorry just the leadership group) that other teams are as well. the comment said, Llong wanted them to win, nothingbtindo with a country cheating.
Had to you said cheat, your point would have been valid as it would have been singular. Was it your English or your maths that let you down?
Gee imagine if an Aussie umpire did similar. There'd be a whole new topic dedicated to it by now.
Ironic that India, hater of DRS, was saved by it.
So you now beliebe that England bribed and umpire to let australia win. Unlike yours, my country aren't proven cheats.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v India - test series
Bunnings had it on lockdown, just in case...
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aus v India - test series
God is an Englishman wrote:They weren't "saved by it", the right decisions were made because of it.Bomber wrote:Collusion. Look it up. Infers plural hence cheatS.God is an Englishman wrote:
I like how you assume that just because your team was involved in an entire team of cheats (sorry just the leadership group) that other teams are as well. the comment said, Llong wanted them to win, nothingbtindo with a country cheating.
Had to you said cheat, your point would have been valid as it would have been singular. Was it your English or your maths that let you down?
Gee imagine if an Aussie umpire did similar. There'd be a whole new topic dedicated to it by now.
Ironic that India, hater of DRS, was saved by it.
So you now beliebe that England bribed and umpire to let australia win. Unlike yours, my country aren't proven cheats.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/a ... d=11967315
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
A denied accusation. Never anything proven.Wayne Kerr wrote:https://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugby-u ... oody-cheat
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v India - test series
Wayne Kerr wrote:https://www.theroar.com.au/2011/09/30/e ... world-cup/
They replaced a dodgy ball. OK against the rules but minor and truly clutching off you think that's comparable to using sandpaper.