Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
How much did it cost them to be told what non australian cricket fans have been saying for years.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Win at all costs mentality got to them. That will change as the current mob don't look like winning in a while. Eventually they'll go back to being "uncompromising" (with some limitations) and they'll slowly bounce back. I'll give them 2 years of being crap before things get better.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
There's already calls to release the 3 of them from their bans. Win at all costs is still alive.Bomber wrote:Win at all costs mentality got to them. That will change as the current mob don't look like winning in a while. Eventually they'll go back to being "uncompromising" (with some limitations) and they'll slowly bounce back. I'll give them 2 years of being crap before things get better.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
God is an Englishman wrote:There's already calls to release the 3 of them from their bans. Win at all costs is still alive.Bomber wrote:Win at all costs mentality got to them. That will change as the current mob don't look like winning in a while. Eventually they'll go back to being "uncompromising" (with some limitations) and they'll slowly bounce back. I'll give them 2 years of being crap before things get better.
ban was too lengthy to begin win. Warner should NEVER return to wear the baggy green!
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
"Calls" only by those who could see others got away with much less for similar offences. I still say the 12 months should stand (as they will), but also same should apply to anyone else found guilty moving forward.God is an Englishman wrote:There's already calls to release the 3 of them from their bans. Win at all costs is still alive.Bomber wrote:Win at all costs mentality got to them. That will change as the current mob don't look like winning in a while. Eventually they'll go back to being "uncompromising" (with some limitations) and they'll slowly bounce back. I'll give them 2 years of being crap before things get better.
Ignore this signature
-
- Coach
- Posts: 21805
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 215 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
I agree 12 month bans should be the norm, if only some other countries and ICC had issued heavy penalties in the past.Bomber wrote:"Calls" only by those who could see others got away with much less for similar offences. I still say the 12 months should stand (as they will), but also same should apply to anyone else found guilty moving forward.God is an Englishman wrote:There's already calls to release the 3 of them from their bans. Win at all costs is still alive.Bomber wrote:Win at all costs mentality got to them. That will change as the current mob don't look like winning in a while. Eventually they'll go back to being "uncompromising" (with some limitations) and they'll slowly bounce back. I'll give them 2 years of being crap before things get better.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
All of the other proven instances could be put down to one person being a cheat. This was corruption by the "senior" players to cheat. There was no precedent for this.Bomber wrote:
"Calls" only by those who could see others got away with much less for similar offences. I still say the 12 months should stand (as they will), but also same should apply to anyone else found guilty moving forward.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
The 2nd part we can agree onWayne Kerr wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:There's already calls to release the 3 of them from their bans. Win at all costs is still alive.Bomber wrote:Win at all costs mentality got to them. That will change as the current mob don't look like winning in a while. Eventually they'll go back to being "uncompromising" (with some limitations) and they'll slowly bounce back. I'll give them 2 years of being crap before things get better.
ban was too lengthy to begin win. Warner should NEVER return to wear the baggy green!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
I was shocked they got so long, especially after Australia's history of covering things up or giving short bans.ozzie owl wrote:
I agree 12 month bans should be the norm, if only some other countries and ICC had issued heavy penalties in the past.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Just seen Rod Marsh saying that the ball tampering wasn't entirely the players faults and as such they should have their bans lifted.
- Bodø
- Apprentice
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2018 4:59 pm
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
I used to have a lot of respect for Rod Marsh.God is an Englishman wrote:Just seen Rod Marsh saying that the ball tampering wasn't entirely the players faults and as such they should have their bans lifted.
Kawasaki Versys 1000
Yamaha Xmax 300
Honda Goldwing 1800
Yamaha Xmax 300
Honda Goldwing 1800
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
I didn't.Bodø wrote:I used to have a lot of respect for Rod Marsh.God is an Englishman wrote:Just seen Rod Marsh saying that the ball tampering wasn't entirely the players faults and as such they should have their bans lifted.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
So when he recalled Randall when given out in the centenary test, you didn't respect that? Or when he tried to tell Greg Chappell, "nah mate" just before the underarm?God is an Englishman wrote:I didn't.Bodø wrote:I used to have a lot of respect for Rod Marsh.God is an Englishman wrote:Just seen Rod Marsh saying that the ball tampering wasn't entirely the players faults and as such they should have their bans lifted.
Maybe you're too young to remember, but history should be one of your better subjects.
See me after class.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Bomber wrote:
So when he recalled Randall when given out in the centenary test, you didn't respect that? Or when he tried to tell Greg Chappell, "nah mate" just before the underarm?
Maybe you're too young to remember, but history should be one of your better subjects.
See me after class.
I know of both of those incidents but the first dealings I knew of was when he came in to coach at the academy, he was useless.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:
So when he recalled Randall when given out in the centenary test, you didn't respect that? Or when he tried to tell Greg Chappell, "nah mate" just before the underarm?
Maybe you're too young to remember, but history should be one of your better subjects.
See me after class.
I know of both of those incidents but the first dealings I knew of was when he came in to coach at the academy, he was useless.
just like the pom batsmen in the 2013/14 ashes test
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Wayne Kerr wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:
So when he recalled Randall when given out in the centenary test, you didn't respect that? Or when he tried to tell Greg Chappell, "nah mate" just before the underarm?
Maybe you're too young to remember, but history should be one of your better subjects.
See me after class.
I know of both of those incidents but the first dealings I knew of was when he came in to coach at the academy, he was useless.
just like the pom batsmen in the 2013/14 ashes test
No, the poms win in 13/14, are you thinking of 10/11 when England won easily?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Been a long while since england ever won "easily" - around '78/79 when WSC started and best of our team went there leaving some second graders to play ashes.
5-0 drubbings by Australia however.............
5-0 drubbings by Australia however.............
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
2010/11 - England won 3-1Bomber wrote:Been a long while since england ever won "easily" - around '78/79 when WSC started and best of our team went there leaving some second graders to play ashes.
5-0 drubbings by Australia however.............
3 wins by an innings and the drawn game had a 517-1. EASY.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Meh, come back to me when you can manage a 5-0 - a PROPER thrashing! I'll even give you a 4-0 if/when you can manage one and I know your best chance might be the next seriesGod is an Englishman wrote:2010/11 - England won 3-1Bomber wrote:Been a long while since england ever won "easily" - around '78/79 when WSC started and best of our team went there leaving some second graders to play ashes.
5-0 drubbings by Australia however.............
3 wins by an innings and the drawn game had a 517-1. EASY.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Do you actually watch cricket?Bomber wrote:5-0's and 4-0's : EASIER!God is an Englishman wrote:3 games by an innings. EASY.
3-1 is a solid win at best
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Yes, and with both eyes open. You should try it some time.God is an Englishman wrote:Do you actually watch cricket?Bomber wrote:5-0's and 4-0's : EASIER!God is an Englishman wrote:3 games by an innings. EASY.
3-1 is a solid win at best
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
I'm not convinced you do if you think winning 3 games in a series by an innings wasn't an easy win.
You could win 5-0 and each win by a run or a wicket and it would be easy? By an innings- easy.
You could win 5-0 and each win by a run or a wicket and it would be easy? By an innings- easy.
Last edited by God is an Englishman on Mon Nov 05, 2018 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Finally, the penny drops.God is an Englishman wrote:You could win 5-0 and each win by a run or a wicket and it would be easy.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Bomber wrote:Finally, the penny drops.God is an Englishman wrote:You could win 5-0 and each win by a run or a wicket and it would be easy.
You agree with that? I've now added the question mark.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Oh dear, poor punctuation as well now.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Finally, the penny drops.God is an Englishman wrote:You could win 5-0 and each win by a run or a wicket and it would be easy.
You agree with that? I've now added the question mark.
You must like staying in after class.
2-1 down with only one test to go, could have been a massive change from result of one test.
Whereas 5-0................well, fat lady was singing with weeks to spare.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
Bomber wrote:
Oh dear, poor punctuation as well now.
You must like staying in after class.
2-1 down with only one test to go, could have been a massive change from result of one test.
Whereas 5-0................well, fat lady was singing with weeks to spare.
so you thinking winning by a run would be an easy win.
Come on, you're not even trying.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aussie cricket 'culture' review
I don't have to try when its so simple - with one test to go, the series was in the balance - hardly "easy".God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:
Oh dear, poor punctuation as well now.
You must like staying in after class.
2-1 down with only one test to go, could have been a massive change from result of one test.
Whereas 5-0................well, fat lady was singing with weeks to spare.
so you thinking winning by a run would be an easy win.
Come on, you're not even trying.
Ignore this signature