David Warner walking off pitch
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
David Warner walking off pitch
How funny was that? From all accounts, the biggest sledger in international cricket has a cry because of some mild sledging.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
talking to yourself, again ........
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Wayne Kerr wrote:talking to yourself, again ........
No, provided some links to some articles I found amusing.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Bomber wrote:Maybe Warner should have instead seen a shrink like half the ex-england team did years back.
Can you name three of them?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Trott, Swann & KP - all mental.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Maybe Warner should have instead seen a shrink like half the ex-england team did years back.
Can you name three of them?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
1/3 - see me after class.Bomber wrote:Trott, Swann & KP - all mental.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Maybe Warner should have instead seen a shrink like half the ex-england team did years back.
Can you name three of them?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Bomber wrote:So there were even more that lost their minds - like I said, half the team.
Can you name 3 of them?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
I did - you didn't believe me.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:So there were even more that lost their minds - like I said, half the team.
Can you name 3 of them?
Can you?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
No, I can't.Bomber wrote:I did - you didn't believe me.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:So there were even more that lost their minds - like I said, half the team.
Can you name 3 of them?
Can you?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Would it have been better to name one who has and 2 who hadn't?Bomber wrote:See me after class
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Yes - beats nothing at all.God is an Englishman wrote:Would it have been better to name one who has and 2 who hadn't?Bomber wrote:See me after class
You do realise getting a zero or failing to answer is a fail in most tests.
Plus unless you personally know and regularly liaise with the "other two" how would you know for sure they haven't? Many won't openly advertise the fact.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
1/3 is a fail.Bomber wrote:Yes - beats nothing at all.God is an Englishman wrote:Would it have been better to name one who has and 2 who hadn't?Bomber wrote:See me after class
You do realise getting a zero or failing to answer is a fail in most tests.
Plus unless you personally know and regularly liaise with the "other two" how would you know for sure they haven't? Many won't openly advertise the fact.
However, in my case - I have the correct answer. You asked if I could name 3 and I answered the trick question.
3 shoild have been easy for you as you said there was at least 6 of them.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".
Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
How are you going to name 0.5 of a person? You need to round up to 6.Bomber wrote:Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".
Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
You didn't get 3, you named 3 but two were incorrect. I suggest we get some back up to of those names or you admit you exaggerated and got called out on it.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
You only think two are incorrect, meaning you aren't likely to know much more on the matter.God is an Englishman wrote:How are you going to name 0.5 of a person? You need to round up to 6.Bomber wrote:Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".
Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
You didn't get 3, you named 3 but two were incorrect. I suggest we get some back up to of those names or you admit you exaggerated and got called out on it.
And if you are going to say "at least" then you need to round down, not up.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Bomber wrote:You only think two are incorrect, meaning you aren't likely to know much more on the matter.God is an Englishman wrote:How are you going to name 0.5 of a person? You need to round up to 6.Bomber wrote:Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".
Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
You didn't get 3, you named 3 but two were incorrect. I suggest we get some back up to of those names or you admit you exaggerated and got called out on it.
And if you are going to say "at least" then you need to round down, not up.
5 would be less than half, it would need to be at least 6.
Do you have any thing to back up your answer? If you can provide proof then I will remark your test.
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1376
- Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:21 pm
- Been thanked: 28 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
https://www.firstpost.com/sports/fighti ... 02204.html
Monty Panesar
Jonathon Trott
Marcus Trescothick
Andrew Flintoff
Michael Yardy
Steve Harmison
Monty Panesar
Jonathon Trott
Marcus Trescothick
Andrew Flintoff
Michael Yardy
Steve Harmison
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.
As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.
*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.
*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
Ignore this signature
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Splitting hairs after being proved wrong....Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.
As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.
*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Proved wrong? How so, Perry Mason?Old Redback wrote:Splitting hairs after being proved wrong....Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.
As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.
*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
Ignore this signature
-
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Quite simple - you claimed half, named three and two were wrong.Bomber wrote:Proved wrong? How so, Perry Mason?Old Redback wrote:Splitting hairs after being proved wrong....Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.
As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.
*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60406
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
Can you prove that two were wrong? And looks like C.U.N.S named another five, which so far no-one is disputing, so shall we say "up to 8" then?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: David Warner walking off pitch
To be half the team, what is the least number you could have given. 5.5, that number is not possible, so it has to be 6. Had I said up to 6, then you could have named one person.Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.
As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.
*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
The minimum number you could give to be right would be... how many class... yes, well done, it's 6.
So, "As for proof, I don't have any," - that's all we need. You've just made up numbers.
CUNS list - mentions players with mental disorders, nothing about seeing a shrink. The number needed would also go up as they all played at different time. You now need half of MANY teams. However, at least he has managed the 3 I was looking for.