David Warner walking off pitch

This forum is for discussion of other sports.

Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

How funny was that? From all accounts, the biggest sledger in international cricket has a cry because of some mild sledging.
Image

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Image

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Image

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Image

Wayne Kerr
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1762
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:29 pm

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Wayne Kerr »

talking to yourself, again ........
We got Ova' Here?? #ACCUPAHATERS!




Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

Maybe Warner should have instead seen a shrink like half the ex-england team did years back.
Ignore this signature

ozzie owl
Coach
Coach
Posts: 21778
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
Has thanked: 212 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by ozzie owl »

Wayne Kerr wrote:talking to yourself, again ........
:lol: :lol:

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Wayne Kerr wrote:talking to yourself, again ........

No, provided some links to some articles I found amusing.
Image

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:Maybe Warner should have instead seen a shrink like half the ex-england team did years back.

Can you name three of them?
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:Maybe Warner should have instead seen a shrink like half the ex-england team did years back.

Can you name three of them?
Trott, Swann & KP - all mental.
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:Maybe Warner should have instead seen a shrink like half the ex-england team did years back.

Can you name three of them?
Trott, Swann & KP - all mental.
1/3 - see me after class.
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

So there were even more that lost their minds - like I said, half the team. :P
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:So there were even more that lost their minds - like I said, half the team. :P

Can you name 3 of them?
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:So there were even more that lost their minds - like I said, half the team. :P

Can you name 3 of them?
I did - you didn't believe me.

Can you?
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:So there were even more that lost their minds - like I said, half the team. :P

Can you name 3 of them?
I did - you didn't believe me.

Can you?
No, I can't.
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

See me after class
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:See me after class
Would it have been better to name one who has and 2 who hadn't?
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:See me after class
Would it have been better to name one who has and 2 who hadn't?
Yes - beats nothing at all.

You do realise getting a zero or failing to answer is a fail in most tests.

Plus unless you personally know and regularly liaise with the "other two" how would you know for sure they haven't? Many won't openly advertise the fact.
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:See me after class
Would it have been better to name one who has and 2 who hadn't?
Yes - beats nothing at all.

You do realise getting a zero or failing to answer is a fail in most tests.

Plus unless you personally know and regularly liaise with the "other two" how would you know for sure they haven't? Many won't openly advertise the fact.
1/3 is a fail.

However, in my case - I have the correct answer. You asked if I could name 3 and I answered the trick question.

3 shoild have been easy for you as you said there was at least 6 of them.
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".

Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".

Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
How are you going to name 0.5 of a person? You need to round up to 6.

You didn't get 3, you named 3 but two were incorrect. I suggest we get some back up to of those names or you admit you exaggerated and got called out on it.
Image

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".

Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
How are you going to name 0.5 of a person? You need to round up to 6.

You didn't get 3, you named 3 but two were incorrect. I suggest we get some back up to of those names or you admit you exaggerated and got called out on it.
You only think two are incorrect, meaning you aren't likely to know much more on the matter.

And if you are going to say "at least" then you need to round down, not up.
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:Sorry, but another fail. What is half of eleven? PS - hint - it's "not at least six".

Plus: 1/3 > 0/3 (even though I got 3/3)
How are you going to name 0.5 of a person? You need to round up to 6.

You didn't get 3, you named 3 but two were incorrect. I suggest we get some back up to of those names or you admit you exaggerated and got called out on it.
You only think two are incorrect, meaning you aren't likely to know much more on the matter.

And if you are going to say "at least" then you need to round down, not up.

5 would be less than half, it would need to be at least 6.

Do you have any thing to back up your answer? If you can provide proof then I will remark your test.
Image

C U Next Saturday
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2017 2:21 pm
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by C U Next Saturday »

https://www.firstpost.com/sports/fighti ... 02204.html

Monty Panesar
Jonathon Trott
Marcus Trescothick
Andrew Flintoff
Michael Yardy
Steve Harmison

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.

As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.

*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
Ignore this signature

Old Redback
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Old Redback »

Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.

As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.

*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
Splitting hairs after being proved wrong....

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

Old Redback wrote:
Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.

As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.

*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
Splitting hairs after being proved wrong....
Proved wrong? How so, Perry Mason?
Ignore this signature

Old Redback
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Old Redback »

Bomber wrote:
Old Redback wrote:
Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.

As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.

*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
Splitting hairs after being proved wrong....
Proved wrong? How so, Perry Mason?
Quite simple - you claimed half, named three and two were wrong.

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by Bomber »

Can you prove that two were wrong? And looks like C.U.N.S named another five, which so far no-one is disputing, so shall we say "up to 8" then?
Ignore this signature

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: David Warner walking off pitch

Post by God is an Englishman »

Bomber wrote:To GIAE : No, 6 is more than half, so using "at least" you are referring to the minimum, therefore the lesser sum. Had you said "up to six" you would have scored a tick.

As for proof, I don't have any, just word of people in the know, and given I doubt you can provide proof to the contrary, it's your word against mine and therefore you'll have to deal with it, accept it or just agree to disagree.

*KP still is a nutter - you only have to hear his commentary to know that he needs ongoing mental therapy.
To be half the team, what is the least number you could have given. 5.5, that number is not possible, so it has to be 6. Had I said up to 6, then you could have named one person.

The minimum number you could give to be right would be... how many class... yes, well done, it's 6.

So, "As for proof, I don't have any," - that's all we need. You've just made up numbers.

CUNS list - mentions players with mental disorders, nothing about seeing a shrink. The number needed would also go up as they all played at different time. You now need half of MANY teams. However, at least he has managed the 3 I was looking for.
Image

Post Reply