Coach_Mulatinho wrote:SAP is a minimal fee, to cover ground hire and uniforms
(from memory, last year was $200 and they got about 25 sessions plus kit over summer)[/quote
FFSA squads and state/national representation should be at zero cost, is my point.
Agree .....
But dont say that the most talented werent selected then either[/quote][/quote]
he can say that and discuss that because talent isnt the same for everyone point of view
themessenger wrote:
When being a member of the State team does not rely on the ability to pay, then maybe the most talented players will get selected.
As a matter of interest, which talented players did not get selected to go to Coffs due to the cost ?
u13 Skilleroos is 11 mths of training/playing FREE plus all their gear, as it is an FFA scholarship
SAP is a minimal fee, to cover ground hire and uniforms
(from memory, last year was $200 and they got about 25 sessions plus kit over summer)
being charged for grounds?
1/6.... but still 6.
"you see the eye to detail,the accuracy of the pass, it's the weight of the pass and the decision making in the games, that makes top players stand out form average players" - Rene' Meulensteen,
Željko Jurin wrote:They arent at Burton, they are zonal
ahhh i c
1/6.... but still 6.
"you see the eye to detail,the accuracy of the pass, it's the weight of the pass and the decision making in the games, that makes top players stand out form average players" - Rene' Meulensteen,
These results were possibly because the actual teams to go to Coffs Harbour were selected too late in the season.Three weeks prior for the players and two weeks prior for the keepers in my opinion is way too late.
Cruyff wrote:Both teams went to Coffs with high expectations this year..The results dont show that we did well..13s finishing bottom and 14s second bottom...but how did they play..did they play the system well...they tell us results dont matter but have a ladder....so if the ladder doesnt count how did we actually play
On the website results show ladder of results and the U13s actually finished second Bottom.
Last edited by cool hand luke on Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cruyff wrote:Both teams went to Coffs with high expectations this year..The results dont show that we did well..13s finishing bottom and 14s second bottom...but how did they play..did they play the system well...they tell us results dont matter but have a ladder....so if the ladder doesnt count how did we actually play
On the website results show ladder of results and the U13s actually finished second bottom.
Under 14's Conceded 10 goals in 6 games, they left there bes defender back in Adelaide coz he couldn't attend all training sessions. The reason he couldn't attend all training sessions is because he has good enough to play in the 18's premier league in a successful team. Oohh well there loss is someone else's gain.
As a coach next year do I do the same thing and have a poor kid miss out on representing his state???
CMON CARLTON
crue head wrote:
looprevil wrote:No. But there is no harm in being positive to AUFC.
Maybe everyone doesn't adore AUFC
Last time I checked it's not an AUFC supporters only forum
cheesecake shop 2 wrote:Under 14's Conceded 10 goals in 6 games, they left there bes defender back in Adelaide coz he couldn't attend all training sessions. The reason he couldn't attend all training sessions is because he has good enough to play in the 18's premier league in a successful team. Oohh well there loss is someone else's gain.
As a coach next year do I do the same thing and have a poor kid miss out on representing his state???
Will the national coaches/scouts be at his U18 games next year?
cheesecake shop 2 wrote:Under 14's Conceded 10 goals in 6 games, they left there bes defender back in Adelaide coz he couldn't attend all training sessions. The reason he couldn't attend all training sessions is because he has good enough to play in the 18's premier league in a successful team. Oohh well there loss is someone else's gain.
As a coach next year do I do the same thing and have a poor kid miss out on representing his state???
So at least 1 talented SA player did not go to Coffs! Lol
cheesecake shop 2 wrote:Under 14's Conceded 10 goals in 6 games, they left there bes defender back in Adelaide coz he couldn't attend all training sessions. The reason he couldn't attend all training sessions is because he has good enough to play in the 18's premier league in a successful team. Oohh well there loss is someone else's gain.
As a coach next year do I do the same thing and have a poor kid miss out on representing his state???
Will the national coaches/scouts be at his U18 games next year?
What has that got to do with a player missing on under 14 state selection coz he was playing under 18's???
CMON CARLTON
crue head wrote:
looprevil wrote:No. But there is no harm in being positive to AUFC.
Maybe everyone doesn't adore AUFC
Last time I checked it's not an AUFC supporters only forum
