Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins
Way to go with the abuse - yet still still you have provided not one shred of evidence to support your case. See merson's comments above.regangrandson wrote:U18/Res/Seniors 120K divided by about 55 players. So each cost about $2k to pit on the park. It's not that it''s a terrible thing, just a fact that seniors are susidused by income coming from juniors fees. If people don''t like it they can FO, but stop bullshitting about it not being the case.
Not bullshitting, I gave you facts and figures ... What junior figures was I bullshitting ?regangrandson wrote:U18/Res/Seniors 120K divided by about 55 players. So each cost about $2k to pit on the park. It's not that it''s a terrible thing, just a fact that seniors are susidused by income coming from juniors fees. If people don''t like it they can FO, but stop bullshitting about it not being the case.Željko Jurin wrote:Dont need to quote the senior side, as I was just showing where our 'junior fees' go
Yes, you need to find another $100k+ to run a senior PL team
Whats abusive about that? Basic kids fees are FFSA fees, kits. Probably about $200 to $250 but I an sure ZJ can fill in the finer details. The rest is general revenue and it's just a little creative but unconvincing to try and pigeon hole these expenses. It's pretty clear 90K paid to seniors if it was removed would reduce the kids fees by approx 90K. That would reduce your kids fees based on a club with 250 kids by $360 per player. Pretty simple maths. Don't expect seniors to play for nothing but to say the juniors don't subsidise the seniors is a huge wank.Stitch This wrote:Way to go with the abuse - yet still still you have provided not one shred of evidence to support your case. See merson's comments above.regangrandson wrote:U18/Res/Seniors 120K divided by about 55 players. So each cost about $2k to pit on the park. It's not that it''s a terrible thing, just a fact that seniors are susidused by income coming from juniors fees. If people don''t like it they can FO, but stop bullshitting about it not being the case.
(You do know who he is btw, don't you?)
Juniors fund a club, there is no need to label what, just like there is no need to label where sponsors money goes, it goes to the club and they pay their expenses, end of.doesmyheadin wrote:Whats abusive about that? Basic kids fees are FFSA fees, kits. Probably about $200 to $250 but I an sure ZJ can fill in the finer details. The rest is general revenue and it's just a little creative but unconvincing to try and pigeon hole these expenses. It's pretty clear 90K paid to seniors if it was removed would reduce the kids fees by approx 90K. That would reduce your kids fees based on a club with 250 kids by $360 per player. Pretty simple maths. Don't expect seniors to play for nothing but to say the juniors don't subsidise the seniors is a huge wank.Stitch This wrote:Way to go with the abuse - yet still still you have provided not one shred of evidence to support your case. See merson's comments above.regangrandson wrote:U18/Res/Seniors 120K divided by about 55 players. So each cost about $2k to pit on the park. It's not that it''s a terrible thing, just a fact that seniors are susidused by income coming from juniors fees. If people don''t like it they can FO, but stop bullshitting about it not being the case.
(You do know who he is btw, don't you?)
doesmyheadin wrote:Whats abusive about that? .......Stitch This wrote:Way to go with the abuse - yet still still you have provided not one shred of evidence to support your case. See merson's comments above.regangrandson wrote:U18/Res/Seniors 120K divided by about 55 players. So each cost about $2k to pit on the park. It's not that it''s a terrible thing, just a fact that seniors are susidused by income coming from juniors fees. If people don''t like it they can FO, but stop bullshitting about it not being the case.
(You do know who he is btw, don't you?)
,regangrandson wrote:If people don''t like it they can FO
Still no evidence.doesmyheadin wrote:Don't expect seniors to play for nothing but to say the juniors don't subsidise the seniors is a huge wank.
You might want to check your statement before making statements like that on an open forum. Yes players had to purchase their playing strips but the club paid the FFSA fees and the players did not have to buy a tracksuit. As for unmarked pitches well you obviously need glasses. All coaches were ffsa accredited.rossonero wrote:toros was free, but u had to buy your home and away kit, tracksuit, bag and pay for the ffsa rego fee....on top of that you played on unmarked pitch, kids had to put up their own nets and coached by .............
regarding fees, i was told this by a group of parents who have kids playing at toros.....snoopy11 wrote:You might want to check your statement before making statements like that on an open forum. Yes players had to purchase their playing strips but the club paid the FFSA fees and the players did not have to buy a tracksuit. As for unmarked pitches well you obviously need glasses. All coaches were ffsa accredited.rossonero wrote:toros was free, but u had to buy your home and away kit, tracksuit, bag and pay for the ffsa rego fee....on top of that you played on unmarked pitch, kids had to put up their own nets and coached by .............
