rd 4 results

This forum is for discussion relating to junior football.

Moderators: John Cena, Forum Admins

User avatar
sufc13s
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:19 pm

rd 4 results

Post by sufc13s »

u13a jpl
para 0 cumb 3
sal utd 4 raiders 3
sth ad 2 west str 2
Last edited by sufc13s on Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Cruyff
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Cruyff »

U15C JPL
Eastern United 1 V Playford 3
U14C JPL
Eastern United 0 V Sturt 1

barca343
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:21 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by barca343 »

U13JPL A
Incorrect Score
CUFC 3 : Parahills 0

User avatar
sufc13s
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 218
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:19 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by sufc13s »

barca343 wrote:U13JPL A
Incorrect Score
CUFC 3 : Parahills 0

thanks I got wrong mail cheers

Temperance
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:19 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Temperance »

U12 Red JSL
Adel Olympic 1 Sth Adel 11
U12 Red JPL
Sth Adel 3 Cumberland Utd 5
U13 Red JSL
Sth Adel 3 Cumberland Utd 3
U13A JPL
Sth Adel 2 Western Strikers 2
U14B JPL
Sth Adel 1 Modbury 4
U15C JPL
Sth Adel 5 Western Toros 0

Armageddon
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Armageddon »

U13 JSL : Plympton 0 : 4 Para Hills
U14JPL : Para hills 2 : 1 Playford
U14 JSL : Plympton 2 : 5 Para Hills
U15 JPL : Metros 6 : 1 Para Hills
U17 : Para Hills 2 : 2 ABE

Adrenalin
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:01 am

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Adrenalin »

U16A
Raiders 1-0 Metrostars

develop
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by develop »

JPL U16B

Seaford 2 v 1 White City

owl man
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 5:58 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by owl man »

16s b

Para hills 14 cobras nil
Last edited by owl man on Sun Apr 21, 2013 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Push It
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 194
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:40 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Push It »

U/12 JSL Para Hills 2 Raiders 2


U/14 JSL Raiders 2 campbelltown 1

beskid
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 273
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 9:59 am

Re: rd 4 results

Post by beskid »

U15A
Abe 3 - Birkalla 1
Comets 2 - Campbel 3
West Adl 2 - Cumberland 0
Croydon 1 - Ad city 1
Metro 6 - Para Hills 1

grumbly
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: rd 4 results

Post by grumbly »

U17

Salisbury United 5-4 White City (city up 4-1 half time)
Last edited by grumbly on Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
OldGold
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:40 am

Re: rd 4 results

Post by OldGold »

U16 C
Noarlunga Utd 1 v Toros 2!

U14 C
White City 0 v Noarlunga Utd 5

best
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:33 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by best »

Ac 16a won 4-3
Ac 15a drew 1-1
Ac 14a won 6-2
Ac 13a won 3-1
Ac 12a won 2-0

Armageddon
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Armageddon »

best wrote:Ac 16a won 4-3
Ac 15a drew 1-1
Ac 14a won 6-2
Ac 13a won 3-1
Ac 12a won 2-0
whilst the zebras had a good day....who did they play or are AC too good to put in the opponents ?

best
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 257
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:33 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by best »

best wrote:Ac 16a won 4-3
Ac 15a drew 1-1
Ac 14a won 6-2
Ac 13a won 3-1
Ac 12a won 2-0

16 west
15?
14 berk
13camb
12 west

sexyred
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 11:51 am

Re: rd 4 results

Post by sexyred »

grumbly wrote:U17

Salisbury United 5-4 White City (city up 4-1 half time)

Should've been 6-4 but their linesman cheated...

Armageddon
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 324
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 9:20 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Armageddon »

sexyred wrote:
grumbly wrote:U17

Salisbury United 5-4 White City (city up 4-1 half time)

Should've been 6-4 but their linesman cheated...
White City cheating ? NEVER :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :clown: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

johnydep
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 5803
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 11:17 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by johnydep »

sexyred wrote:
grumbly wrote:U17

Salisbury United 5-4 White City (city up 4-1 half time)

Should've been 6-4 but their linesman cheated...
Why do we have to have this discussion all the time?

The lines-person is not a qualified official, they are doing the best that they can. No parent wants the responsibility to run the line, especially when they're there to watch their son or daughter play.

It's lucky that we get anyone to take on the responsibility; imagine if everyone said no.

Lines-person decisions fall into five categories -
  • The majority of mistakes are just that - mistakes.
    The correct decision was made but the on-lookers did not see it, or are in the wrong location/angle.
    Line-person does not know the correct Laws of the Game.
    Concentration dropped causing indecision, and automatically lifting flag.
    Lastly; a very tiny minority will cheat.
RESPECT all officials, including the parent that runs the line every blue moon.

Have some faith in people, you'll have a happier life.

Winston_the_First
Ball Boy
Ball Boy
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:25 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Winston_the_First »

johnydep wrote:
sexyred wrote:
grumbly wrote:U17

Salisbury United 5-4 White City (city up 4-1 half time)

Should've been 6-4 but their linesman cheated...
Why do we have to have this discussion all the time?

The lines-person is not a qualified official, they are doing the best that they can. No parent wants the responsibility to run the line, especially when they're there to watch their son or daughter play.

It's lucky that we get anyone to take on the responsibility; imagine if everyone said no.

Lines-person decisions fall into five categories -
  • The majority of mistakes are just that - mistakes.
    The correct decision was made but the on-lookers did not see it, or are in the wrong location/angle.
    Line-person does not know the correct Laws of the Game.
    Concentration dropped causing indecision, and automatically lifting flag.
    Lastly; a very tiny minority will cheat.
RESPECT all officials, including the parent that runs the line every blue moon.

Have some faith in people, you'll have a happier life.
Great post JohnyDep

As a parent, I will;
- put up nets and corner posts before the game
- take down nets and pack up after a game
- wear the Ground Supervisor vest
- assist with any other duties

But I will not run the line. Why? Even though I understand the rules, the intense level of scruitiny this role attracts and the potential levels of aggravation it can cause leads me to conclude I would rather not. I can do without the inevitable conflict and slanging that occurs and I see every other week. Sad but true.

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60405
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 129 times

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Bomber »

Sad part is when you ask someone to take the flag, suddenly "they dont know the rules". Soon as someone else grabs it, "suddenly" they know the rules. Even more bemusing is if you ask a player (not playing that game) and he says the same thing. Unbelievable!
Ignore this signature

matty2323
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:20 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by matty2323 »

johnydep wrote:
sexyred wrote:
grumbly wrote:U17

Salisbury United 5-4 White City (city up 4-1 half time)

Should've been 6-4 but their linesman cheated...
Why do we have to have this discussion all the time?

The lines-person is not a qualified official, they are doing the best that they can. No parent wants the responsibility to run the line, especially when they're there to watch their son or daughter play.

It's lucky that we get anyone to take on the responsibility; imagine if everyone said no.

Lines-person decisions fall into five categories -
  • The majority of mistakes are just that - mistakes.
    The correct decision was made but the on-lookers did not see it, or are in the wrong location/angle.
    Line-person does not know the correct Laws of the Game.
    Concentration dropped causing indecision, and automatically lifting flag.
    Lastly; a very tiny minority will cheat.
RESPECT all officials, including the parent that runs the line every blue moon.

Have some faith in people, you'll have a happier life.
People make mistakes, often they're caught in the wrong position and aren't looking along the line. They're ball watching and then all of a sudden it goes forward and the player is in an offside position. They probably were onside when it was kicked, but you have to excuse the parents for watching the game. Most actually miss off sides too, and players score goals. It all evens itself out, getting worked up about it just creates an unnecessary, volatile atmosphere. Those very few that do 'cheat' get found out by the referee quick enough, and he soon stops obeying their flag. Enjoy the game, put up with some bad calls, because trust me, even when you get official linesman at senior level, they aint much better! haha.

give us a break
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 473
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 9:04 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by give us a break »

While running the lines in previous years, I always enjoyed being heckled by some experts 50 metres up the the pitch with shouts like:
"That's not off-side!"
Sir, I may not agree with what you say, but I shall defend to the death your right to be a complete fool. - Voltaire

User avatar
Stitch This
Assistant Coach
Assistant Coach
Posts: 11902
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: rd 4 results

Post by Stitch This »

give us a break wrote:While running the lines in previous years, I always enjoyed being heckled by some experts 50 metres up the the pitch with shouts like:
"That's not off-side!"
I apologise for that.
Time for some righteous indignation

grumbly
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: rd 4 results

Post by grumbly »

Flag was only put up after the goal was scored and all the defenders turned and looked at him. Bad calls and mistakes are forgiven, this was neither.

But putting that aside, it was a cracking game (can I brag about our goalie here :D ) and I thoroughly enjoyed the majority of that match.

ThundaChucka
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:27 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by ThundaChucka »

Just to add to the White city v Salisbury u17 game. Regardless of the offside call. It was a disgrace the way some people carried on about the call, some people should calm down. The advice from a few in the stands was deplorable and is not going to change the out come of the call. Also some people need to consider others around them too. But then again we are playing for sheep stations, aren't we.

grumbly
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:31 pm
Has thanked: 1 time

Re: rd 4 results

Post by grumbly »

Actually, I agree there Thunda and I won't defend our spectators but emotions were running high after coming back so well.
Nice to hear WC thank some of his players for playing down too.

kings
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:32 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by kings »

14 jpl Comets 2 - Cumberland 2
14 jsl Metro stars 2 - Cumberland 0

User avatar
robinfriday10
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 2234
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm

Re: rd 4 results

Post by robinfriday10 »

Be happy the linesman was doing your defence, we had a game on Saturday where one official Lino was there so the home linesman did both halves but official kept on same side both halves so club Lino on same side both halves. 2 down at half time deservedly, then second half conceded 7, 5 were. Disputed by the defence for offside.....to no avail naturally. Then with 5 to go ref picks up an offside from 30 metres away that the Lino didn't flag for..... Completing a our doubt to the offside credibility.

Be happy he did his defence at sal vs w.c
things happen for a reason

User avatar
OldGold
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:40 am

Re: rd 4 results

Post by OldGold »

Should've been 6-4 but their linesman cheated...[/quote]


RESPECT all officials, including the parent that runs the line every blue moon.

Have some faith in people, you'll have a happier life.[/quote][/b


Well said!

Even though Ive played/coached/supported the game for many years I dread having to run the line... not because I don't know the rules, its having to put up with the crap and verbals from those that don't (ie; "its not a contact sport buddy" from the Salisbury coach a few weeks ago)
"United were good... but they still weren't Wolves!" George Best

Post Reply