I knew this was coming as soon as it happened. I was surprised the cricket VAR can decide a ball can hit the stumps but not sufficiently enough to dislodge a bail. Well, I think that's what saw. I really only had it on in the background.God is an Englishman wrote:"aussies" cheating again. Even bomber has to admit that one.
Australia v Pakistan
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- Okinotorishima
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 12:09 pm
Re: Australia v Pakistan
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60404
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Depends on their nationality (according to some).Cooper wrote:Are they still a cheat if they just look for clarification and not sure about what happened?
Ignore this signature
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 3168
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:11 am
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
if a cheat is caught out at least justice is served but overall well done Australia I didn't actually think they would win that easyGod is an Englishman wrote:In that case, warner, bosnich, warne, sailor, armstrong, johnson aren't that bad either as they got caught.Dave now from No 9 wrote:root is more a cheat as he got away with his lol , but all cabernet aside I think they both thought they caught it so neither are real cheats not like warner and co
I may not be perfect but I'm still the closest I have ever come across
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
It does appear that way.Bomber wrote:Depends on their nationality (according to some).Cooper wrote:Are they still a cheat if they just look for clarification and not sure about what happened?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Cooper wrote:Are they still a cheat if they just look for clarification and not sure about what happened?
I woukd say that's not cheating.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4325
- Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm
- Has thanked: 92 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
I agreeGod is an Englishman wrote:Cooper wrote:Are they still a cheat if they just look for clarification and not sure about what happened?
I woukd say that's not cheating.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60404
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
If that happened no-one would even raise the matter.Cooper wrote:I agreeGod is an Englishman wrote:Cooper wrote:Are they still a cheat if they just look for clarification and not sure about what happened?
I woukd say that's not cheating.
Ironic that Marnus was the culprit of Root's grounder - so maybe he set the precedence, so...…….
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Bomber wrote:
If that happened no-one would even raise the matter.
Ironic that Marnus was the culprit of Root's grounder - so maybe he set the precedence, so...…….
No, they wouldn't. Instead he decided to cheat.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60404
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Using Root's example as his template, yes.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:
If that happened no-one would even raise the matter.
Ironic that Marnus was the culprit of Root's grounder - so maybe he set the precedence, so...…….
No, they wouldn't. Instead he decided to cheat.
Ignore this signature
- Michael
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Bomber wrote:Just saw what NZ did to england in their test.
Just shown that the Poms cant play with the kookaburra on a flat pitch!
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Why won't you call him a cheat for doing so?Bomber wrote:Using Root's example as his template, yes.God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:
If that happened no-one would even raise the matter.
Ironic that Marnus was the culprit of Root's grounder - so maybe he set the precedence, so...…….
No, they wouldn't. Instead he decided to cheat.
- Okinotorishima
- Boot Polisher
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2014 12:09 pm
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Steve Smith was the lowest scorer in the Auustralian inning. He really needs to lift his game.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
eagleboy wrote:Forget the Paki's. England coming off humiliating Ashes loss . Now beaten by NZ. NZ won by an innings and 65 runs
We haven't lost an ashes for 2 years, what are you on about?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
You said when you would do it, not why you wouldn't do it now.Bomber wrote:What part of my answer didn't you get?God is an Englishman wrote: Why won't you call him a cheat for doing so?
Seems strange that you won't call out a cheat.
-
- Star Player
- Posts: 4333
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 280 times
- Been thanked: 84 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
CorrectGod is an Englishman wrote:eagleboy wrote:Forget the Paki's. England coming off humiliating Ashes loss . Now beaten by NZ. NZ won by an innings and 65 runs
We haven't lost an ashes for 2 years, what are you on about?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60404
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
No stranger than you not calling Joe Root one.God is an Englishman wrote:You said when you would do it, not why you wouldn't do it now.Bomber wrote:What part of my answer didn't you get?God is an Englishman wrote: Why won't you call him a cheat for doing so?
Seems strange that you won't call out a cheat.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Not really, you know the saffer didn't catch it. The evidence is inconclusive on Root.Bomber wrote:
No stranger than you not calling Joe Root one.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60404
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Check this (again):God is an Englishman wrote:Not really, you know the saffer didn't catch it. The evidence is inconclusive on Root.Bomber wrote:
No stranger than you not calling Joe Root one.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/th ... 3c2833635a
Pretty conclusive! If you can't see it, then I suggest that Specsavers appointment is long overdue.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Bomber wrote:Check this (again):God is an Englishman wrote:Not really, you know the saffer didn't catch it. The evidence is inconclusive on Root.Bomber wrote:
No stranger than you not calling Joe Root one.
https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/th ... 3c2833635a
Pretty conclusive! If you can't see it, then I suggest that Specsavers appointment is long overdue.
Correct, conclusive that his fingers are under the ball.
So will you book yourself an appointment?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60404
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Ball touching grass. That's all that matters. I know you have "selective" vision, but when it's clear for all to see, you really have lost the argument. Even Root isn't "looking" in that pic
So if Marnus is a cheat, then so is Root. Simple.
So if Marnus is a cheat, then so is Root. Simple.
Ignore this signature
- Michael
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Bomber wrote:Ball touching grass. That's all that matters. I know you have "selective" vision, but when it's clear for all to see, you really have lost the argument. Even Root isn't "looking" in that pic
So if Marnus is a cheat, then so is Root. Simple.
Marnus is NOT a cheat, he asked for the review
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
- Michael
- First Team Regular
- Posts: 2040
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:14 pm
- Has thanked: 84 times
- Been thanked: 18 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
You haven't won it since 2015!God is an Englishman wrote:eagleboy wrote:Forget the Paki's. England coming off humiliating Ashes loss . Now beaten by NZ. NZ won by an innings and 65 runs
We haven't lost an ashes for 2 years, what are you on about?
out of the 335 Tests between Australia and England,;
Australia won 136
England won 108
Drawn 91
Aussie's are better at this game than the poms!
Sáncte Míchael Archángele, defénde nos in proélio, cóntra nequítiam et insídias diáboli ésto præsídium.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60404
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Is that so? I didn't know that.Michael wrote:Bomber wrote:Ball touching grass. That's all that matters. I know you have "selective" vision, but when it's clear for all to see, you really have lost the argument. Even Root isn't "looking" in that pic
So if Marnus is a cheat, then so is Root. Simple.
Marnus is NOT a cheat, he asked for the review
If true then I take back what I said.
But Root is still a cheat.
Ignore this signature
- Raich Carter
- Squad Player
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 1:49 pm
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
I don't think the fielder can ask for a review, it was the batsman and I think he did it initially because he believed the ball did not hit the bat, which was in fact correctBomber wrote:Is that so? I didn't know that.Michael wrote:Bomber wrote:Ball touching grass. That's all that matters. I know you have "selective" vision, but when it's clear for all to see, you really have lost the argument. Even Root isn't "looking" in that pic
So if Marnus is a cheat, then so is Root. Simple.
Marnus is NOT a cheat, he asked for the review
If true then I take back what I said.
But Root is still a cheat.
When I am king, you will be first against the wall
With your opinion which is of no consequence at all
With your opinion which is of no consequence at all
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Michael wrote:Bomber wrote:Ball touching grass. That's all that matters. I know you have "selective" vision, but when it's clear for all to see, you really have lost the argument. Even Root isn't "looking" in that pic
So if Marnus is a cheat, then so is Root. Simple.
Marnus is NOT a cheat, he asked for the review
No he didn't. He jumped up and celebrated the catch.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v Pakistan
Not relevant to my statement of fact.Michael wrote:You haven't won it since 2015!God is an Englishman wrote:eagleboy wrote:Forget the Paki's. England coming off humiliating Ashes loss . Now beaten by NZ. NZ won by an innings and 65 runs
We haven't lost an ashes for 2 years, what are you on about?
out of the 335 Tests between Australia and England,;
Australia won 136
England won 108
Drawn 91
Aussie's are better at this game than the poms!
Series wise - australia are only one ahead.