Re: Aussie Bad Sports
Posted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 2:08 pm
Soccer in Italy is clean and the national team is above reproach regarding 'cheating'...do yourself a favour and enjoy some reading about the 1934 World Cup in Italy....
Grosso Mk II wrote:the chickens are coming home to roost for the sanctimonious skips
the cheating convicts are so desperate now they're bringing up tales from 85 years ago
How about 2016 :Grosso Mk II wrote:the chickens are coming home to roost for the sanctimonious skips
the cheating convicts are so desperate now they're bringing up tales from 85 years ago
Grosso Mk II wrote:the chickens are coming home to roost for the sanctimonious skips
the cheating convicts are so desperate now they're bringing up tales from 85 years ago
But grosso is :wink:God is an Englishman wrote:Grosso Mk II wrote:the chickens are coming home to roost for the sanctimonious skips
the cheating convicts are so desperate now they're bringing up tales from 85 years ago
Mega a skip
Michael wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Is it proven he's a drug cheat?
If it's just allegations then what's his opinion on Thorpe?
If it's proven what's his opinion on shane warne?
What does Warne and Thorpe have to do with this topic??
Maybe throw in a few "english" cheats like Dean Richards or the famous Stuart Broad!
Who is this?B.Toomer wrote:Matt Horton, calling Matt Horton.
Aussies don't cheatMegaBonus wrote:Frank Costanza
We now have no leg to stand on regarding calling out others for drug cheats.
no...i dont see it like that....as long as we arent hypocritial in our dealings with our own 'cheats'....
Grosso Mk II wrote:the chickens are coming home to roost for the sanctimonious skips
the cheating convicts are so desperate now they're bringing up tales from 85 years ago
Warne never proven, as wasn't Thorpe.God is an Englishman wrote:Michael wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Is it proven he's a drug cheat?
If it's just allegations then what's his opinion on Thorpe?
If it's proven what's his opinion on shane warne?
What does Warne and Thorpe have to do with this topic??
Maybe throw in a few "english" cheats like Dean Richards or the famous Stuart Broad!
Well Warne was a drug cheat and Thorpe had the allegations.
When did Broad cheat? Richards was a terrible one.
Doping cases ( not including recreational drugs) in sports that are part of the Olympic Games , guess who is miles out in front of Australia , Italy or Great Britain? Or by the way of three who has the lowest?Grosso Mk II wrote:looks like the Aussie doping program is systematic... more evidence coming out by the hour
loving this
https://www.foxsports.com.au/more-sport ... eab9734beaAmid the turmoil, fresh accusations of another cover-up have re-emerged.
Members of the Australian Para Swim Team are allegedly misrepresenting their disabilities in order to compete against athletes who are more severely impaired.
Ahead of the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games, members of the team are preparing for classification testing which assesses their disabilities and allows them to be categorised with athletes of a similar standing.
Often described as a murky process impacted by the pressure of tying funding to medal tallies, the alleged cheating and lies have prompted several athletes to speak out.
As a former member of the team, I witnessed intentional misrepresentation become not only accepted but expected. Throughout my career I heard athletes casually mention how they had been thrown in the snow prior to classification, so their muscles and joints were far stiffer than usual, or how they’d been instructed by someone higher up to “throw on a limp” during testing.
Others bound their limbs to restrict flexibility, strength and fine motor skills or pushed themselves to physical exhaustion just before the test in order to reduce stamina and power.
There were also athletes who had previously competed as able-bodied who borrowed a disability for classification.
Funny how facts are only relevant when it suits your argument. Otherwise, the usual dodge, deflect we have been accustomed to.Grosso Mk II wrote:Look at this jabroni go
so desperate for attention
wrong again not many hiding unlike you when bowled out so quickly against the irish lolB.Toomer wrote:Now watch the aussies go hiding on this topic.
is this you?Bomber wrote:Funny how facts are only relevant when it suits your argument. Otherwise, the usual dodge, deflect we have been accustomed to.Grosso Mk II wrote:Look at this jabroni go
so desperate for attention
Glasshouses etc......
Don't forget his other defence to ignore any question where he is caught out.Bomber wrote:Funny how facts are only relevant when it suits your argument. Otherwise, the usual dodge, deflect we have been accustomed to.Grosso Mk II wrote:Look at this jabroni go
so desperate for attention
Glasshouses etc......
ironic since every post you've made in this thread has been a pathetic attempt at deflectionozzie owl wrote:Don't forget his other defence to ignore any question where he is caught out.Bomber wrote:Funny how facts are only relevant when it suits your argument. Otherwise, the usual dodge, deflect we have been accustomed to.Grosso Mk II wrote:Look at this jabroni go
so desperate for attention
Glasshouses etc......
Warne never proven. He tested positive and was given a ban.Michael wrote: Warne never proven, as wasn't Thorpe.
Broad is a cheat and so was Richards.
God is an Englishman wrote:Warne never proven. He tested positive and was given a ban.Michael wrote: Warne never proven, as wasn't Thorpe.
Broad is a cheat and so was Richards.
Let's hear this on Richards then. Which law did Broad break? (I actually agree by the way, he was - but so was almost every australian ever in that case - even including Warner yesterday).
Yes, called him one at the time.Michael wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Warne never proven. He tested positive and was given a ban.Michael wrote: Warne never proven, as wasn't Thorpe.
Broad is a cheat and so was Richards.
Let's hear this on Richards then. Which law did Broad break? (I actually agree by the way, he was - but so was almost every australian ever in that case - even including Warner yesterday).
So you agree Broad is a cheat!
Case closed
God is an Englishman wrote:Yes, called him one at the time.Michael wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:
Warne never proven. He tested positive and was given a ban.
Let's hear this on Richards then. Which law did Broad break? (I actually agree by the way, he was - but so was almost every australian ever in that case - even including Warner yesterday).
So you agree Broad is a cheat!
Case closed
You have ignored all the rest though, typical aussie.
We only have your word for that.Michael wrote:
Not an Aussie, do you not understand?
Or maybe you cant read?
Why do seem to have a foot in both camps? Something to do with your ancestry?Grosso Mk II wrote:on a per capita basis, Aussies among the worst dopers in the world
China aren't even in the top 10 for total cases
Why do you skips have to cheat at everything? Something to do with your ancestry?
Raich Carter wrote:Why do seem to have a foot in both camps? Something to do with your ancestry?Grosso Mk II wrote:on a per capita basis, Aussies among the worst dopers in the world
China aren't even in the top 10 for total cases
Why do you skips have to cheat at everything? Something to do with your ancestry?