Page 2 of 2
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 11:49 am
by Bomber
zzz wrote:zzz wrote:
both poles and both have head problems
Owned, yet still persists.
It's like you want to look even more foolish than already known presently. If so, it's working.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 12:46 pm
by zzz
Bomber wrote:zzz wrote:zzz wrote:
both poles and both have head problems
Owned, yet still persists.
It's like you want to look even more foolish than already known presently. If so, it's working.
You live in your own little world. Get help, there are people who can help you.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 1:25 pm
by Bomber
I don't need to hear what your voices are telling you each time you look in the mirror.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2019 8:16 pm
by zzz
Bomber wrote:I don't need to hear what your voices are telling you each time you look in the mirror.
(I know you are but what I am)... primary school comeback
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:02 am
by Bomber
zzz wrote:Bomber wrote:I don't need to hear what your voices are telling you each time you look in the mirror.
(I know you are but what I am)... primary school comeback
I thought you graduated to Idiot High though?
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:20 am
by zzz
Bomber wrote:zzz wrote:Bomber wrote:I don't need to hear what your voices are telling you each time you look in the mirror.
(I know you are but what I am)... primary school comeback
I thought you graduated to Idiot High though?
mocking you
simple comprehension is another basic IQ test you've failed
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 11:13 am
by Bomber
It usually helps if the mocker has one over the intended "mock-ee", but I don't expect you to see that.
Best let others be judges of IQ tests who think Pucovski is a Pole.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:57 pm
by eagleboy
Bomber wrote:It usually helps if the mocker has one over the intended "mock-ee", but I don't expect you to see that.
Best let others be judges of IQ tests who think Pucovski is a Pole.
Dead giveaway is no V in Polish alphabet. It would be written as a W in most Nth European Countries.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2019 3:01 pm
by Bomber
Back on topic, Paine still no good at tosses!
Last I looked Sri Lanka 2/42 though so not bad so far.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2019 2:32 pm
by Celebrity Juice
Australia could win by an innings.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:16 am
by Bomber
Finally, Paine wins the toss! A rare event indeed.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 10:41 am
by Just Dave now
Bomber wrote:Finally, Paine wins the toss! A rare event indeed.
fat lot of good so far , they are 2/24 batting first
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 11:23 am
by Bomber
Dave from Number 12 wrote:Bomber wrote:Finally, Paine wins the toss! A rare event indeed.
fat lot of good so far , they are 2/24 batting first
3/59 now - just saw Khawaja's dismissal - if that's how he will treat a swinging ball then he doesn't deserve to be on a flight to the ashes.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 12:12 pm
by ozzie owl
3/103 at lunch
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 1:29 pm
by Bomber
3/138 - Burns 61no, Head 57no - recovery mode. Will we finally see a century this summer (from an Aussie)?
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 2:33 pm
by Just Dave now
Bomber wrote:3/138 - Burns 61no, Head 57no - recovery mode. Will we finally see a century this summer (from an Aussie)?
yes you will , burns is on 100 but check out the bowling attack lol
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:24 pm
by Bomber
Head got his ton too
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2019 3:58 pm
by Just Dave now
cabernet they are clobbering them now , I spoke too soon
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 11:32 am
by Just Dave now
T20 been a bit of a cake walk
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:07 am
by ozzie owl
Dave now from No 9 wrote:T20 been a bit of a cake walk
Crowds have been a disaster for CA.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:23 am
by Michael
ozzie owl wrote:Dave now from No 9 wrote:T20 been a bit of a cake walk
Crowds have been a disaster for CA.
waiting for the "big bash"?
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:29 am
by ozzie owl
Michael wrote:ozzie owl wrote:Dave now from No 9 wrote:T20 been a bit of a cake walk
Crowds have been a disaster for CA.
waiting for the "big bash"?
I would think so, be interesting to see what pre-sales are like for the 2020 2020 World Cup.
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:35 am
by Michael
ozzie owl wrote:Michael wrote:ozzie owl wrote:
Crowds have been a disaster for CA.
waiting for the "big bash"?
I would think so, be interesting to see what pre-sales are like for the 2020 2020 World Cup.
What's a 2020 2020 world cup?
Or you just Stuttering
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:44 am
by Bomber
ozzie owl wrote:Dave now from No 9 wrote:T20 been a bit of a cake walk
Crowds have been a disaster for CA.
I haven't been that interested either to be honest.
Bring on the tests
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 4:29 pm
by Victoria's Secret
ozzie owl wrote:Dave now from No 9 wrote:T20 been a bit of a cake walk
Crowds have been a disaster for CA.
All depends what they expected. But yes agree, they have been poor.
If they planned on small crowds CA won't consider it a disaster
Re: Australia v Sri Lanka
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2019 5:44 pm
by ozzie owl
six and out wrote:ozzie owl wrote:Dave now from No 9 wrote:T20 been a bit of a cake walk
Crowds have been a disaster for CA.
All depends what they expected. But yes agree, they have been poor.
If they planned on small crowds CA won't consider it a disaster
The AO had planned on a crowd of over 25k and only got 16k so poor result . Similar poor crowds at other international T20 games so far this summer .