ENG v IND Test Series
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 16 times
ENG v IND Test Series
Cracking series so far.
I immensely dislike both teams equally but there's been some great test cricket over the first 3 tests.
Kohli clearly the best batsman in the world but with conditions favouring the England bowlers it's making for a great series.
Test cricket isn't dead
I immensely dislike both teams equally but there's been some great test cricket over the first 3 tests.
Kohli clearly the best batsman in the world but with conditions favouring the England bowlers it's making for a great series.
Test cricket isn't dead
WHO TOOK MY TV GUIDE???
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
has been a great series, If you drop so many catches though, you can't win a test as England found out in this one.
2-1 up, 1 to play.
2-1 up, 1 to play.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 21804
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 213 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
IMO opinion the commentators are brilliant as well, great coverage.Frank Costanza wrote:Cracking series so far.
I immensely dislike both teams equally but there's been some great test cricket over the first 3 tests.
Kohli clearly the best batsman in the world but with conditions favouring the England bowlers it's making for a great series.
Test cricket isn't dead
- Stitch This
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 11902
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Stand up, if you're 3-1 upStitch This wrote:Another day, another batting collapse
- Stitch This
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 11902
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Panic over, it'll be 4-1 soonGod is an Englishman wrote:Stand up, if you're 3-1 upStitch This wrote:Another day, another batting collapse
Time for some righteous indignation
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
4-1 is going to flatter England, India have played well. 3-2 would actually be about right.Rookie wrote:India continue their pathetic away record, but well done to England
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Either way, England ashes odds will be shortened. I actually think the poms will do us easily next time and India will give us a decent run on our decks too.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Well it did, you won 4-0.Bomber wrote:B.Toomer wrote:Don't fret, you'll do O.K. as long as you bring your sandpaper with you.
Ho hum, didn't help much last time did it.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Didn't use it then.God is an Englishman wrote:Well it did, you won 4-0.Bomber wrote:B.Toomer wrote:Don't fret, you'll do O.K. as long as you bring your sandpaper with you.
Ho hum, didn't help much last time did it.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
I think you mean, you didn't get caught using it then.Bomber wrote:Didn't use it then.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
No, not at all. Didn't need to.God is an Englishman wrote:I think you mean, you didn't get caught using it then.Bomber wrote:Didn't use it then.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Of course you didn't, you had David Wagner's "tape" then.Bomber wrote:No, not at all. Didn't need to.God is an Englishman wrote:I think you mean, you didn't get caught using it then.Bomber wrote:Didn't use it then.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Who's Wagner? Tape? Haven't you enough straws to cling on to?God is an Englishman wrote:
Of course you didn't, you had David Wagner's "tape" then.
4-0 is 4-0 - its a belting.
Worry about the return series next year (which I think you'll probably reverse that score)
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Wagner, I think he's David Warner's pseudonym. He uses it now as he made a mockery of the other name.Bomber wrote:Who's Wagner? Tape? Haven't you enough straws to cling on to?God is an Englishman wrote:
Of course you didn't, you had David Wagner's "tape" then.
4-0 is 4-0 - its a belting.
Worry about the return series next year (which I think you'll probably reverse that score)
Come on, it's pretty obvious that it didn't just suddenly happen in that one test in s africa.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Really? You assuming again? Better off looking at other captains/teams as well that where there was actually evidence of ball tampering.God is an Englishman wrote:Wagner, I think he's David Warner's pseudonym. He uses it now as he made a mockery of the other name.Bomber wrote:Who's Wagner? Tape? Haven't you enough straws to cling on to?God is an Englishman wrote:
Of course you didn't, you had David Wagner's "tape" then.
4-0 is 4-0 - its a belting.
Worry about the return series next year (which I think you'll probably reverse that score)
Come on, it's pretty obvious that it didn't just suddenly happen in that one test in s africa.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
I'm sure he just can't afford to buy sugar, that's why he was loading it into his pockets.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Oh and today, Anderson should go past McGrath as well as the leading fast bowler.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
It was a type of salt - helps with cleaning the whites apparently (so the cleaning lady said).God is an Englishman wrote:I'm sure he just can't afford to buy sugar, that's why he was loading it into his pockets.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
To be fair, the cleaning lady probably has more integrity that the australian cricket team.Bomber wrote:It was a type of salt - helps with cleaning the whites apparently (so the cleaning lady said).God is an Englishman wrote:I'm sure he just can't afford to buy sugar, that's why he was loading it into his pockets.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
She could have probably hit a few runs against your bowling attack too.God is an Englishman wrote:To be fair, the cleaning lady probably has more integrity that the australian cricket team.Bomber wrote:It was a type of salt - helps with cleaning the whites apparently (so the cleaning lady said).God is an Englishman wrote:I'm sure he just can't afford to buy sugar, that's why he was loading it into his pockets.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Do you mean the 4th= (until about 12pm GMT) and 8th leading wicket takers of all time?Bomber wrote:She could have probably hit a few runs against your bowling attack too.
Maybe you should stop doctoring all your pitches to not do anything except bounce.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60405
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
So you don't want the ball to bounce? That's absurd. We tried a grubber once and all hell broke loose!God is an Englishman wrote:Do you mean the 4th= (until about 12pm GMT) and 8th leading wicket takers of all time?Bomber wrote:She could have probably hit a few runs against your bowling attack too.
Maybe you should stop doctoring all your pitches to not do anything except bounce.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: ENG v IND Test Series
Feel free to read my post again.Bomber wrote:So you don't want the ball to bounce? That's absurd. We tried a grubber once and all hell broke loose!God is an Englishman wrote:Do you mean the 4th= (until about 12pm GMT) and 8th leading wicket takers of all time?Bomber wrote:She could have probably hit a few runs against your bowling attack too.
Maybe you should stop doctoring all your pitches to not do anything except bounce.