Re: ODI's
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:10 pm
Who won yesterday's game?
I heard England in another close game. Also heard that Curran is their new bell-end (in Broad's absence).Hirohito wrote:Who won yesterday's game?
Just the 5 wickets from the young Surrey player.Bomber wrote:I heard England in another close game. Also heard that Curran is their new bell-end (in Broad's absence).Hirohito wrote:Who won yesterday's game?
Preferable to have just one or two in the team, rather than a whole team of bell-ends.Bomber wrote:I heard England in another close game. Also heard that Curran is their new bell-end (in Broad's absence).Hirohito wrote:Who won yesterday's game?
Why bring India into the discussion?Stitch This wrote:Preferable to have just one or two in the team, rather than a whole team of bell-ends.Bomber wrote:I heard England in another close game. Also heard that Curran is their new bell-end (in Broad's absence).Hirohito wrote:Who won yesterday's game?
I'm guessing there will be more poms with sandpaper at the ground than Aussies.B.Toomer wrote:The cheating aussies would have brought their own sandpaper, surely.
I doubt the ground can fit 20 million in it.Bomber wrote:I'm guessing there will be more poms with sandpaper at the ground than Aussies.B.Toomer wrote:The cheating aussies would have brought their own sandpaper, surely.
That doesn't make sense.God is an Englishman wrote:I doubt the ground can fit 20 million in it.Bomber wrote:I'm guessing there will be more poms with sandpaper at the ground than Aussies.B.Toomer wrote:The cheating aussies would have brought their own sandpaper, surely.
So, you think the ground can hold 20 million?Bomber wrote:That doesn't make sense.
I would just reply with 4-1 if you didMegaBonus wrote:gee...and I thought we were going to mention Scotland.....
What has that got to do with the fact that more of your lot are likely to be carrying sandpaper?God is an Englishman wrote:So, you think the ground can hold 20 million?Bomber wrote:That doesn't make sense.
Well unless the ground holds 20 Million, how can we have more in the ground than aussies? There's over 20 Million aussies.Bomber wrote:What has that got to do with the fact that more of your lot are likely to be carrying sandpaper?God is an Englishman wrote:So, you think the ground can hold 20 million?Bomber wrote:That doesn't make sense.
Do you really think I needed to end that sentence with "at the ground"?Bomber wrote:
I'm guessing there will be more poms with sandpaper at the ground than Aussies.
Well, if you wanted to be clear then yes you did. Otherwise you allow me to deflect away from the scotland v England Reserves result by being pedantic about 20 million aussies.Bomber wrote:Do you really think I needed to end that sentence with "at the ground"?Bomber wrote:
I'm guessing there will be more poms with sandpaper at the ground than Aussies.
You must be bored.
Never mind the scots, if you play them often enough, they'll beat you at some point. It's like us with NZ - once in a blue moon they might get up.God is an Englishman wrote:Well, if you wanted to be clear then yes you did. Otherwise you allow me to deflect away from the scotland v England Reserves result by being pedantic about 20 million aussies.Bomber wrote:Do you really think I needed to end that sentence with "at the ground"?Bomber wrote:
I'm guessing there will be more poms with sandpaper at the ground than Aussies.
You must be bored.
Hawksey....you're losing it.....when did Scotland beat Australia 4-1?????God is an Englishman
MegaBonus wrote:
gee...and I thought we were going to mention Scotland.....
I would just reply with 4-1 if you did
England did thoughMegaBonus wrote:Hawksey....you're losing it.....when did Scotland beat Australia 4-1?????God is an Englishman
MegaBonus wrote:
gee...and I thought we were going to mention Scotland.....
I would just reply with 4-1 if you did
It's pretty simple really, I'm surprised you're not following it to be honest. You can't really give stick to a country who lost to a lesser country, when that same country stuffed you.MegaBonus wrote:still not sure what Scotland V England has to do with Australia....its almost as if you cant handle the embarrassment thus you need to transfer it onto others....
MegaBonus wrote:errr...yeah you can. Australia hasn't lost to Scotland whereas England has...
I didn't realise you were the keeper of the 'who/when/why give stick' etiquette.....
Our "reserves". :wink:God is an Englishman wrote:MegaBonus wrote:errr...yeah you can. Australia hasn't lost to Scotland whereas England has...
I didn't realise you were the keeper of the 'who/when/why give stick' etiquette.....
And England continues to beat australia.
How was it your reserves?Bomber wrote:Our "reserves". :wink:God is an Englishman wrote:MegaBonus wrote:errr...yeah you can. Australia hasn't lost to Scotland whereas England has...
I didn't realise you were the keeper of the 'who/when/why give stick' etiquette.....
And England continues to beat australia.