Steve Smith a cheat?

Bomber · **Posted:** Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:54 pm

God is an Englishman wrote:

Bomber wrote:

Treatment of Broad? Is he worried about meaningless papers now? I hope he chooses a different shrink to that of Trott.

If you refer to Aussie crowds, the vast majority boo him with a smile, much like they did to the saffer captain recently.

He's seemed to cope with Aussie crowds in the BBL okay, so maybe you're making mountains out of molehills (see Bodo for therapy) :wink:

He's not worried at all, I'm sure he laughs at it all and doesn't come out saying how they got to him like some aussies have done.

I'm just highlighting the hypocrisy. Some on here were calling Broad a cheat whilst not seeing the other side of the coin. I'm just here to educate and help you watch with both eyes open.

Who on here? Anyway, you are the hypocrisy police, I get that now, but isn't it funny how you only highlight it when its the big bad Aussies who border on it. We're over Broad - you clearly aren't over Smith.

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Bomber wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

Bomber wrote:

Treatment of Broad? Is he worried about meaningless papers now? I hope he chooses a different shrink to that of Trott.

If you refer to Aussie crowds, the vast majority boo him with a smile, much like they did to the saffer captain recently.

He's seemed to cope with Aussie crowds in the BBL okay, so maybe you're making mountains out of molehills (see Bodo for therapy) :wink:

He's not worried at all, I'm sure he laughs at it all and doesn't come out saying how they got to him like some aussies have done.

I'm just highlighting the hypocrisy. Some on here were calling Broad a cheat whilst not seeing the other side of the coin. I'm just here to educate and help you watch with both eyes open.

Who on here? Anyway, you are the hypocrisy police, I get that now, but isn't it funny how you only highlight it when its the big bad Aussies who border on it. We're over Broad - you clearly aren't over Smith.

Broad was over 3 years ago, Smith wasn't even 3 months ago

I can't specifically remember who on here, but there was a fair few who have referred to him as a cheat.

B.Toomer · **Posted:** Thu Jan 12, 2017 5:19 pm

How can he do that, with only one eye? :wink:

Slinky_Pete · **Joined:** Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm **Posts:** 5863

Bomber wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

Bomber wrote:

Treatment of Broad? Is he worried about meaningless papers now? I hope he chooses a different shrink to that of Trott.

If you refer to Aussie crowds, the vast majority boo him with a smile, much like they did to the saffer captain recently.

He's seemed to cope with Aussie crowds in the BBL okay, so maybe you're making mountains out of molehills (see Bodo for therapy) :wink:

He's not worried at all, I'm sure he laughs at it all and doesn't come out saying how they got to him like some aussies have done.

I'm just highlighting the hypocrisy. Some on here were calling Broad a cheat whilst not seeing the other side of the coin. I'm just here to educate and help you watch with both eyes open.

Who on here? Anyway, you are the hypocrisy police, I get that now, but isn't it funny how you only highlight it when its the big bad Aussies who border on it. We're over Broad - you clearly aren't over Smith.

He hasn't gotten over Ponting yet.

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

I couldn't care less if he got turned down and then beaten up by a tranny.

Wayne Kerr · **Posted:** Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:15 am

God is an Englishman wrote:

I couldn't care less if he got turned down and then beaten up by a tranny.

yes you would, if it was your call girl.

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Wayne Kerr wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

I couldn't care less if he got turned down and then beaten up by a tranny.

yes you would, if it was your call girl.

I've told you before. No matter how much you want it to happen, I'm not that way inclined.

What's your opinion on steve smith being a cheat?

Bomber · **Posted:** Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:41 pm

Interesting to note that Smith first ball edged a caught behind and walked before a Pakistani appealed today. Many others would have waited for a decision.

Inoue Waka · **Joined:** Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:54 pm **Posts:** 112

He was getting sick of Hawkesy giving him stick.

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Bomber wrote:

Interesting to note that Smith first ball edged a caught behind and walked before a Pakistani appealed today. Many others would have waited for a decision.

Well done to him then, maybe he's learnt his lesson.

Stitch This · **Posted:** Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:25 pm

Bomber wrote:

Interesting to note that Smith first ball edged a caught behind and walked before a Pakistani appealed today. Many others would have waited for a decision.

But he didn't during the 3rd test and seemed convinced the DRS had it in for him.

N5 1BH · **Joined:** Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:17 pm **Posts:** 1952

No one can persuade me that simply standing there and respectfully waiting for the umpires decision amounts to cheating. Arguing with the umpire or showing dissent just makes you look like a twat.

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

N5 1BH wrote:

No one can persuade me that simply standing there and respectfully waiting for the umpires decision amounts to cheating. Arguing with the umpire or showing dissent just makes you look like a twat.

I believe you should always walk. My issue is more with that some are chastised for not walking and other's aren't.

Wayne Kerr · **Posted:** Wed Jan 18, 2017 10:02 am

God is an Englishman wrote:

N5 1BH wrote:

No one can persuade me that simply standing there and respectfully waiting for the umpires decision amounts to cheating. Arguing with the umpire or showing dissent just makes you look like a twat.

I believe you should always walk. My issue is more with that some are chastised for not walking and other's aren't.

N5 1BH · **Joined:** Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:17 pm **Posts:** 1952

God is an Englishman wrote:

N5 1BH wrote:

No one can persuade me that simply standing there and respectfully waiting for the umpires decision amounts to cheating. Arguing with the umpire or showing dissent just makes you look like a twat.

I believe you should always walk. My issue is more with that some are chastised for not walking and other's aren't.

I don’t believe all Englishmen would be subjected to double standards and hysterical over the top abuse by the aussie media for not walking. I’m sure Matt Renshaw will be okay when he stands his ground .

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

N5 1BH wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

N5 1BH wrote:

No one can persuade me that simply standing there and respectfully waiting for the umpires decision amounts to cheating. Arguing with the umpire or showing dissent just makes you look like a twat.

I believe you should always walk. My issue is more with that some are chastised for not walking and other's aren't.

I don’t believe all Englishmen would be subjected to double standards and hysterical over the top abuse by the aussie media for not walking. I’m sure Matt Renshaw will be okay when he stands his ground .

I cannot think of anyone in the English media who has been subjected to the abuse that Stuart Broad was.

As for Renshaw - I believe the Barmy Army have some good lighthearted banter in line for him.

Wayne Kerr · **Posted:** Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:57 am

poor little Broad......
:cry:

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Nothing changes, smith still a cheat.

Jim's Alterego · **Posted:** Thu Dec 21, 2017 7:49 pm

What has happened for you to dig this up after eleven months?

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Jim's Alterego wrote:

What has happened for you to dig this up after eleven months?

I was looking for something else and I saw it but Steve Smith claiming catches that have bounced.

Wayne Kerr · **Posted:** Thu Feb 01, 2018 11:16 am

God is an Englishman wrote:

Jim's Alterego wrote:

What has happened for you to dig this up after eleven months?

I was looking for something else and I saw it but Steve Smith claiming catches that have bounced.

As opposed to Butler catching a ball that clearly touched the ground in the ODI?
:roll:

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Wayne Kerr wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

Jim's Alterego wrote:

What has happened for you to dig this up after eleven months?

I was looking for something else and I saw it but Steve Smith claiming catches that have bounced.

As opposed to Butler catching a ball that clearly touched the ground in the ODI?
:roll:

If it clearly hit the ground, which it didn't. How comes the umpires didn't over rule it?

Bomber · **Posted:** Thu Feb 01, 2018 12:56 pm

Because they didn't have scientific microscopic proof, but under the laws of the game had to back the on field umpire who couldn't have been certain anyway. Poor decision, as was Smith's when he got one in his favour in a similar fashion (as per recent FB discussion)

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Bomber wrote:

Because they didn't have scientific microscopic proof, but under the laws of the game had to back the on field umpire who couldn't have been certain anyway. Poor decision, as was Smith's when he got one in his favour in a similar fashion (as per recent FB discussion)

So not CLEARLY then?

When did Smith get one in his favour? Do you mean Khawaja?

Bomber · **Posted:** Thu Feb 01, 2018 3:23 pm

God is an Englishman wrote:

Bomber wrote:

Because they didn't have scientific microscopic proof, but under the laws of the game had to back the on field umpire who couldn't have been certain anyway. Poor decision, as was Smith's when he got one in his favour in a similar fashion (as per recent FB discussion)

So not CLEARLY then?

When did Smith get one in his favour? Do you mean Khawaja?

Yes, Khawaja, sorry. How the ump could categorically say that was out is a joke.

ozzie owl · **Joined:** Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am **Posts:** 16762

Jim's Alterego wrote:

What has happened for you to dig this up after eleven months?

Seems to be hobby on here accusing successful Australian batsmen of cheating , first Steve Waugh and now Smith . Oh yes every single English player is squeaky clean .

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

ozzie owl wrote:

Jim's Alterego wrote:

What has happened for you to dig this up after eleven months?

Seems to be hobby on here accusing successful Australian batsmen of cheating , first Steve Waugh and now Smith . Oh yes every single English player is squeaky clean .

You are a bit like a reformed smoker

Wayne Kerr · **Posted:** Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:26 am

Nice to see the English cricketers continue to cheat in the T20 tri-series..... Claiming catches that clearly hit the ground
:roll:

Cooper · **Joined:** Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:36 pm **Posts:** 889

Wayne Kerr wrote:

Nice to see the English cricketers continue to cheat in the T20 tri-series..... Claiming catches that clearly hit the ground
:roll:

Yep and Clarke the twat calling it 100% out and a terrible decision, what a grenache sucker he is

God is an Englishman · **Joined:** Fri May 08, 2009 6:31 pm **Posts:** 43229

Wayne Kerr wrote:

Nice to see the English cricketers continue to cheat in the T20 tri-series..... Claiming catches that clearly hit the ground
:roll:

Michael Clarke wrote:

100% that's out

"GO YOU REDS"

Steve Smith a cheat?

Who is online