FootballNews
http://www.footballnews.com.au/forum/

Aus v Sth Africa
http://www.footballnews.com.au/forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=80161
Page 1 of 14

Author:  Bomber [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Aus v Sth Africa

Saffers 1 out already, no runs. Good start. :)

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

It's their bowling attack which will cause you the problems. Interesting to see if a normal waca deck has been produced.

Author:  Vernon Howell [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

So this is who is playing. The telecast started just as I was leaving the depot.

Author:  Mr Red [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

4-32 already :wink:

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Mr Red wrote:
4-32 already :wink:


You can't get 32 wickets in one innings

Author:  Mr Red [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

:D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Mr Red wrote:
:D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:


Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.

Author:  Bomber [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

God is an Englishman wrote:
Mr Red wrote:
:D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:


Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.


That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it. :D

4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.

Author:  Mr Red [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Its at the WACA isn't it?

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Mr Red wrote:
:D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:


Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.


That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it. :D

4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.


Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Mr Red wrote:
Its at the WACA isn't it?



Yes

Author:  Bomber [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

God is an Englishman wrote:

Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.



Ever heard the term "When in Rome............" :?:

Author:  Sawajiri Erika [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

The wogs play cricket? :shock:

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:

Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.



Ever heard the term "When in Rome............" :?:


I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.

Author:  Pooraka Sałt [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Bomber wrote:
69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.


105/0 should give you some idea.

Author:  Slinky_Pete [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.


That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it. :D

4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.


Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.


Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?

Author:  Wayne Kerr [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Pooraka Sałt wrote:
Bomber wrote:
69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.


105/0 should give you some idea.



Warner treating it like a 50 over game.

Author:  Wayne Kerr [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:

Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.



Ever heard the term "When in Rome............" :?:


I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.



As if you'd know, being held in a cell isn't travelling in rome
:roll:

Author:  Bomber [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Bomber wrote:
I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............


I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.

Author:  Vernon Howell [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

tsssss !

Author:  Old Redback [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

One good day and the Aussies remember that they play cricket again!

Author:  Bomber [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............


I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.


You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Slinky_Pete wrote:
Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?


No, I have never driven a car in mainland Europe

No law relates to the scoreboard

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............


I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.


You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?


Only just seen it, have answered.

Author:  Bomber [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

God is an Englishman wrote:
Slinky_Pete wrote:
Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?


No, I have never driven a car in mainland Europe

No law relates to the scoreboard


Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here) 8)

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Slinky_Pete wrote:
Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?


No, I have never driven a car in mainland Europe

No law relates to the scoreboard


Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here) 8)


How would that make me feel silly? You can't get 105 wickets in an innings.

Author:  Bomber [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

No-one is claiming anyone has (taken 105 wickets). Simples

Author:  God is an Englishman [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Bomber wrote:
No-one is claiming anyone has (taken 105 wickets). Simples


You have above, you said 0 runs for 105 wickets

Author:  Mr Red [ Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Aus v Sth Africa

:roll: :arrow:

Page 1 of 14 All times are UTC + 9:30 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/