Aus v Sth Africa
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:07 pm
Saffers 1 out already, no runs. Good start.
You can't get 32 wickets in one inningsMr Red wrote:4-32 already
Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.Mr Red wrote: I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced
That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it.God is an Englishman wrote:Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.Mr Red wrote: I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.Bomber wrote:That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it.God is an Englishman wrote:Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.Mr Red wrote: I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced
4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Mr Red wrote:Its at the WACA isn't it?
God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.
I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.Bomber wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.
Ever heard the term "When in Rome............"
105/0 should give you some idea.Bomber wrote:69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?God is an Englishman wrote:Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.Bomber wrote:That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it.God is an Englishman wrote: Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.
4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Pooraka Sałt wrote:105/0 should give you some idea.Bomber wrote:69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
God is an Englishman wrote:I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.Bomber wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.
Ever heard the term "When in Rome............"
I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?God is an Englishman wrote:I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
No, I have never driven a car in mainland EuropeSlinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?
There are local Laws in different places.
Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
Only just seen it, have answered.Bomber wrote:You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?God is an Englishman wrote:I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here)God is an Englishman wrote:No, I have never driven a car in mainland EuropeSlinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?
There are local Laws in different places.
Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No law relates to the scoreboard
How would that make me feel silly? You can't get 105 wickets in an innings.Bomber wrote:Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here)God is an Englishman wrote:No, I have never driven a car in mainland EuropeSlinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?
There are local Laws in different places.
Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No law relates to the scoreboard
You have above, you said 0 runs for 105 wicketsBomber wrote:No-one is claiming anyone has (taken 105 wickets). Simples