Aus v Sth Africa
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- Vernon Howell
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:07 am
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Can/do batsmen add substances to their bat to help take the shine off the ball?
As close to jesus as you're likely to get
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Because the TV evidence doesn't show that at all. It shows a mint in his mouth and it shows him using his saliva to shine the ball. I hope no aussie fielders chew any gum whilst on the field in the next test.Bomber wrote:Faf, I understand the mint thing is a bit of a storm in a teacup, but tv shows you clearly using it to shine the pill and the ICC found you guilty. How you can try and appeal your match fee now is quite laughable. Hansie Cronje had more credibility!
What next, fielders aren't allowed a sandwich at lunch, Gatorade in the drinks break or even to brush their teeth in the morning?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60423
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Why was he cited then? And remember, no Aussie made any complaint, it was the ICC.God is an Englishman wrote:Because the TV evidence doesn't show that at all. It shows a mint in his mouth and it shows him using his saliva to shine the ball. I hope no aussie fielders chew any gum whilst on the field in the next test.Bomber wrote:Faf, I understand the mint thing is a bit of a storm in a teacup, but tv shows you clearly using it to shine the pill and the ICC found you guilty. How you can try and appeal your match fee now is quite laughable. Hansie Cronje had more credibility!
What next, fielders aren't allowed a sandwich at lunch, Gatorade in the drinks break or even to brush their teeth in the morning?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Who made the complaint is irrelevant. It was highlighted by an aussie media company though.Bomber wrote:Why was he cited then? And remember, no Aussie made any complaint, it was the ICC.God is an Englishman wrote:Because the TV evidence doesn't show that at all. It shows a mint in his mouth and it shows him using his saliva to shine the ball. I hope no aussie fielders chew any gum whilst on the field in the next test.Bomber wrote:Faf, I understand the mint thing is a bit of a storm in a teacup, but tv shows you clearly using it to shine the pill and the ICC found you guilty. How you can try and appeal your match fee now is quite laughable. Hansie Cronje had more credibility!
What next, fielders aren't allowed a sandwich at lunch, Gatorade in the drinks break or even to brush their teeth in the morning?
I don't know why he was cited, I think the ICC have made a rod for their own back here. Anyone chewing gum is now up for a ball tampering charge if they touch the ball.
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
How dare the media cover something in the news in their own country!!!God is an Englishman wrote:Who made the complaint is irrelevant. It was highlighted by an aussie media company though.Bomber wrote:Why was he cited then? And remember, no Aussie made any complaint, it was the ICC.God is an Englishman wrote: Because the TV evidence doesn't show that at all. It shows a mint in his mouth and it shows him using his saliva to shine the ball. I hope no aussie fielders chew any gum whilst on the field in the next test.
What next, fielders aren't allowed a sandwich at lunch, Gatorade in the drinks break or even to brush their teeth in the morning?
I don't know why he was cited, I think the ICC have made a rod for their own back here. Anyone chewing gum is now up for a ball tampering charge if they touch the ball.
- Stitch This
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 11902
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Slinky_Pete wrote:How dare the media cover something in the news in their own country!!!
![Image](http://jwtalk.net/forums/uploads/monthly_07_2015/post-4283-0-56340900-1438356388.jpg)
Time for some righteous indignation
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Why did they feel the need to cover it? Did they cover Warner with his chewing gum?Slinky_Pete wrote:How dare the media cover something in the news in their own country!!!
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Did Warner's gum get cited by the ICC?God is an Englishman wrote:Why did they feel the need to cover it? Did they cover Warner with his chewing gum?Slinky_Pete wrote:How dare the media cover something in the news in their own country!!!
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Strangely no, Channel 9 showed coverage of Faf's mint before the ICC charge though. Maybe Warner's gum will be shown in this test.Slinky_Pete wrote:Did Warner's gum get cited by the ICC?God is an Englishman wrote:Why did they feel the need to cover it? Did they cover Warner with his chewing gum?Slinky_Pete wrote:How dare the media cover something in the news in their own country!!!
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Isn't rubbing the ball on players clothing to make it shiny on one side of it a form of ball tampering
Really its a storm in tea cup to me and doesn't deserve a fine that cost a player thousands of dollars. It could open a can of warms as it sets a precedent for others in other similar situations.
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
Really its a storm in tea cup to me and doesn't deserve a fine that cost a player thousands of dollars. It could open a can of warms as it sets a precedent for others in other similar situations.
- Vernon Howell
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:07 am
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Good point. I never thought of tha although when it broke I did think of Rory De Lap having towels on the sidelines to wipe the ball before his throw ins.Mr Red wrote:Isn't rubbing the ball on players clothing to make it shiny on one side of it a form of ball tampering![]()
As close to jesus as you're likely to get
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
That has been my point all along. Steve Smith has said that all teams do it. Doesn't make it right, but it's true. As Amla said, it opens up a can of worms now as MANY players chew gum while they are playing. If they touch the ball now, they could be brought up on ball tampering charges.Mr Red wrote:Isn't rubbing the ball on players clothing to make it shiny on one side of it a form of ball tampering![]()
Really its a storm in tea cup to me and doesn't deserve a fine that cost a player thousands of dollars. It could open a can of warms as it sets a precedent for others in other similar situations.
As for players clothing, it would be defined as a "natural substance" and therefore allowed. Saliva and sweat are allowed as well, just apparently not saliva that has been chewing a mint.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Drinks breaks should be banned as well, someone might have water (or even worse some Gatorade) and then use that saliva to polish the ball.Bomber wrote:Why people need to chew or suck mints whilst playing sport is a bit silly anyway. They have enough drinks/eat breaks.
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
yep especially if you have day 4 tickets - do you get a refund if it doesn't happen?Bomber wrote:Fingers crossed this test lasts at least 4 days.............
-
- Coach
- Posts: 21811
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:42 am
- Has thanked: 215 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
As I understand as long as there is no play , you should be refunded, certainly have one in England for test matches.Mr Red wrote:yep especially if you have day 4 tickets - do you get a refund if it doesn't happen?Bomber wrote:Fingers crossed this test lasts at least 4 days.............
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
If there is no play then you are entitled to a full refund of the ticket price, if there's under 20 overs bowled I believe you are entitled to percentage refund.Mr Red wrote:yep especially if you have day 4 tickets - do you get a refund if it doesn't happen?Bomber wrote:Fingers crossed this test lasts at least 4 days.............
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
umm ok sounds reasonable.God is an Englishman wrote:If there is no play then you are entitled to a full refund of the ticket price, if there's under 20 overs bowled I believe you are entitled to percentage refund.Mr Red wrote:yep especially if you have day 4 tickets - do you get a refund if it doesn't happen?Bomber wrote:Fingers crossed this test lasts at least 4 days.............
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Channel 7 this morning called Faf's declaration a disgrace and against the spirit of the game
Channel 9 last night said Faf was embroiled in controversy again
I am more than happy to admit this is the media because everyone I have spoken to said it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Channel 9 last night said Faf was embroiled in controversy again
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
I am more than happy to admit this is the media because everyone I have spoken to said it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Amusing to see last night that there was more Englishman on the pitch than Australians. Then again, there wasn't a single Australian on the pitch for quite a few overs.
- God Tongue
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 11:47 am
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Australia carried on about having a day/night test and eventually got their way. South Africa are just playing ball. No complaints here.God is an Englishman wrote:Channel 7 this morning called Faf's declaration a disgrace and against the spirit of the game![]()
Channel 9 last night said Faf was embroiled in controversy again![]()
I am more than happy to admit this is the media because everyone I have spoken to said it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.
English is weird. It can be understood through tough thorough thought, though.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
I don't really think anyone except the media is complaining to be fairGod Tongue wrote:Australia carried on about having a day/night test and eventually got their way. South Africa are just playing ball. No complaints here.God is an Englishman wrote:Channel 7 this morning called Faf's declaration a disgrace and against the spirit of the game![]()
Channel 9 last night said Faf was embroiled in controversy again![]()
I am more than happy to admit this is the media because everyone I have spoken to said it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Seemed the commentators were glowing of it last night.God is an Englishman wrote:Channel 7 this morning called Faf's declaration a disgrace and against the spirit of the game![]()
Channel 9 last night said Faf was embroiled in controversy again![]()
I am more than happy to admit this is the media because everyone I have spoken to said it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.
Good move to send in the batters (even if the Warner thing didn't happen) late with the swinging pink ball.
The media there (and I assume morning TV shows) just want a contrary viewpoint.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
Channel 9 news came on straight after the cricket last night calling it a disgrace and controversial. As you said, those in the know thought it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.Slinky_Pete wrote:Seemed the commentators were glowing of it last night.God is an Englishman wrote:Channel 7 this morning called Faf's declaration a disgrace and against the spirit of the game![]()
Channel 9 last night said Faf was embroiled in controversy again![]()
I am more than happy to admit this is the media because everyone I have spoken to said it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.
Good move to send in the batters (even if the Warner thing didn't happen) late with the swinging pink ball.
The media there (and I assume morning TV shows) just want a contrary viewpoint.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60423
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
No refunds applicable - have corporate box lined up for that day - hence I hope it lasts that long!God is an Englishman wrote:If there is no play then you are entitled to a full refund of the ticket price, if there's under 20 overs bowled I believe you are entitled to percentage refund.Mr Red wrote:yep especially if you have day 4 tickets - do you get a refund if it doesn't happen?Bomber wrote:Fingers crossed this test lasts at least 4 days.............
![Cool 8)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Ignore this signature
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60423
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
I'm not sure it was as good as some thought. Warner was likely to have a dash and risk getting out for a few quick runs, whereas the situation really demanded someone hang around and not lose a wicket. The two out there did just that.God is an Englishman wrote:Channel 9 news came on straight after the cricket last night calling it a disgrace and controversial. As you said, those in the know thought it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.Slinky_Pete wrote:Seemed the commentators were glowing of it last night.God is an Englishman wrote:Channel 7 this morning called Faf's declaration a disgrace and against the spirit of the game![]()
Channel 9 last night said Faf was embroiled in controversy again![]()
I am more than happy to admit this is the media because everyone I have spoken to said it was a brilliant piece of captaincy.
Good move to send in the batters (even if the Warner thing didn't happen) late with the swinging pink ball.
The media there (and I assume morning TV shows) just want a contrary viewpoint.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Aus v Sth Africa
It was about making them feel uncomfortable, that was achieved. However, australia responded well.Bomber wrote:I'm not sure it was as good as some thought. Warner was likely to have a dash and risk getting out for a few quick runs, whereas the situation really demanded someone hang around and not lose a wicket. The two out there did just that.