Page 1 of 14

Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:07 pm
by Bomber
Saffers 1 out already, no runs. Good start. :)

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:37 pm
by God is an Englishman
It's their bowling attack which will cause you the problems. Interesting to see if a normal waca deck has been produced.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:04 pm
by Vernon Howell
So this is who is playing. The telecast started just as I was leaving the depot.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:15 pm
by Mr Red
4-32 already :wink:

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:16 pm
by God is an Englishman
Mr Red wrote:4-32 already :wink:
You can't get 32 wickets in one innings

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:43 pm
by Mr Red
:D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:46 pm
by God is an Englishman
Mr Red wrote::D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:
Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:50 pm
by Bomber
God is an Englishman wrote:
Mr Red wrote::D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:
Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.
That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it. :D

4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:55 pm
by Mr Red
Its at the WACA isn't it?

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:58 pm
by God is an Englishman
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Mr Red wrote::D I hear the bag limits for fishing have been reduced :arrow:
Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.
That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it. :D

4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:58 pm
by God is an Englishman
Mr Red wrote:Its at the WACA isn't it?

Yes

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 3:10 pm
by Bomber
God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.

Ever heard the term "When in Rome............" :?:

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 4:20 pm
by Sawajiri Erika
The wogs play cricket? :shock:

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:13 pm
by God is an Englishman
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.

Ever heard the term "When in Rome............" :?:
I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:53 am
by Pooraka Sałt
Bomber wrote:69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
105/0 should give you some idea.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:28 am
by Delete Your Account
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote: Merely stating facts, just because some drunk bloke at the MCG didn't put the scores up correctly doesn't mean you should stick with it.
That's probably even MORE reason we should stick with it. :D

4/69 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.
Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:42 am
by Wayne Kerr
Pooraka Sałt wrote:
Bomber wrote:69/4 now and agree that have to wait until both teams have a hit before knowing who is on top, so to speak. Du Plessis at the crease now and is the man we need out soon.
105/0 should give you some idea.

Warner treating it like a 50 over game.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:43 am
by Wayne Kerr
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Typical aussies, can never just admit when they get it wrong.

Ever heard the term "When in Rome............" :?:
I'm not in Rome, you can tell because there's not rubbish all over the street.

As if you'd know, being held in a cell isn't travelling in rome
:roll:

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:17 am
by Bomber
I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:44 am
by God is an Englishman
Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:55 am
by Vernon Howell
tsssss !

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:09 am
by Old Redback
One good day and the Aussies remember that they play cricket again!

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:42 am
by Bomber
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.
You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:53 am
by God is an Englishman
Slinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No, I have never driven a car in mainland Europe

No law relates to the scoreboard

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 10:54 am
by God is an Englishman
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Bomber wrote:I hope we don't do an "England" and go from 0/100 to all out 160-odd. Then again, we aren't playing Bangladesh, so...............
I'm sure you won't do that, at least you got past 60 in this innings.
You going to answer Slinky Pete's questions by any chance, or do we have to add you to that old topic "unanswered questions" in wild west?
Only just seen it, have answered.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 11:55 am
by Bomber
God is an Englishman wrote:
Slinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No, I have never driven a car in mainland Europe

No law relates to the scoreboard
Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here) 8)

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:27 pm
by God is an Englishman
Bomber wrote:
God is an Englishman wrote:
Slinky_Pete wrote:Have you ever driven a car in Mainland Europe? What side of the road did you drive?

There are local Laws in different places.

Which Law relates to the scoreboard?
No, I have never driven a car in mainland Europe

No law relates to the scoreboard
Feel silly now? Therefore 0/105 = perfectly acceptable (here) 8)
How would that make me feel silly? You can't get 105 wickets in an innings.

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:33 pm
by Bomber
No-one is claiming anyone has (taken 105 wickets). Simples

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:35 pm
by God is an Englishman
Bomber wrote:No-one is claiming anyone has (taken 105 wickets). Simples
You have above, you said 0 runs for 105 wickets

Re: Aus v Sth Africa

Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:36 pm
by Mr Red
:roll: :arrow: