And you still haven't provided any evidenceBomber wrote:No new evidence to contrary or anything deemed admissible.Bomber wrote: Your case is dismissed
Australia v New Zealand
Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I was expecting bomber to post this a while back. Anderson isn't part of the ECB or the captainSlinky_Pete wrote:http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-11/w ... it/6766900
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Because otherwise it's the equivalent of bomber admitting it, obviously.MegaBonus wrote:Why does it have to be the captain or the ECB?
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I feel Anderson (being the front line bowler) has a closer association to the desires of the English captain/ECB than BombreGod is an Englishman wrote:Because otherwise it's the equivalent of bomber admitting it, obviously.MegaBonus wrote:Why does it have to be the captain or the ECB?
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Any recommendation would come from the captain, not a bowler.Slinky_Pete wrote:I feel Anderson (being the front line bowler) has a closer association to the desires of the English captain/ECB than BombreGod is an Englishman wrote:Because otherwise it's the equivalent of bomber admitting it, obviously.MegaBonus wrote:Why does it have to be the captain or the ECB?
Hence, an "admission" would have to come from the captain or the ECB to be an admission. Otherwise it's not an admission.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I have said all along that I believe it did.Bomber wrote:So it happened or it didn't?
- Stitch This
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 11902
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 3:51 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
I hope someone changes the record before lunchtime tomorrow.
Time for some righteous indignation
- Urgh! A Musíc War
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:04 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
+1 but me thinks they won't even discuss it.Stitch This wrote:I hope someone changes the record before lunchtime tomorrow.
I hate screaming kids
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60413
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
No point when you know I'm right, and plaintiff's case being dismissedUrgh! A Musíc War wrote:+1 but me thinks they won't even discuss it.Stitch This wrote:I hope someone changes the record before lunchtime tomorrow.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Plaintiff?Bomber wrote:No point when you know I'm right, and plaintiff's case being dismissedUrgh! A Musíc War wrote:+1 but me thinks they won't even discuss it.Stitch This wrote:I hope someone changes the record before lunchtime tomorrow.
You're far from right and I think you know it.
Seeing as the cricket is on, my first words will be "do you think this pitch is doctored as well?"
- My White Devil
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:53 pm
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Is it already on? I woud have thought with it being a day/night game it would start late.God is an Englishman wrote:Seeing as the cricket is on, my first words will be "do you think this pitch is doctored as well?"
John Webster was one of the best there was
-
- Club Captain
- Posts: 6246
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:47 pm
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
It starts around 1pm, but that's because it's in Perth - not because it's a day/night game.My White Devil wrote:Is it already on? I woud have thought with it being a day/night game it would start late.God is an Englishman wrote:Seeing as the cricket is on, my first words will be "do you think this pitch is doctored as well?"
The D/N test isn't for another fortnight.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60413
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Perth, time diff etcMy White Devil wrote:Is it already on? I woud have thought with it being a day/night game it would start late.God is an Englishman wrote:Seeing as the cricket is on, my first words will be "do you think this pitch is doctored as well?"
Pitch isn't doctored - normal WACA pitch.
Ignore this signature
- My White Devil
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:53 pm
Re: Australia v New Zealand
It's not the Adelaide game? I've got my wires crossed somewhere. It mght explain why when I look at the tv guide last week there was coverage for all sessions listed.
John Webster was one of the best there was
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Will the Aussies now give the same treatment to Khawaja that they did to Broad?
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60413
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Such a loud nick, I would have walked. Poor decisionGod is an Englishman wrote:Will the Aussies now give the same treatment to Khawaja that they did to Broad?
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Bad decision but you have to look at The captain now. Two poor decisions gone against them and both times they were out of reviews.
-
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 6:38 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Shocking umpiring decision, and agree should have walked.Bomber wrote:Such a loud nick, I would have walked. Poor decisionGod is an Englishman wrote:Will the Aussies now give the same treatment to Khawaja that they did to Broad?
The review that NZ used against Warner for the LBW - in my opinion it should have been given out in the first place.
I don't care if technology says it was just hitting the stumps, if the umpire isn't going to give that out LBW then he shouldn't be an umpire
WHO TOOK MY TV GUIDE???
- Urgh! A Musíc War
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:04 am
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Commentators saying how this is not a normal waca wicket. It's not as green and a slower wicket than usual.
Makes bombers earlier comments redundant really.
Makes bombers earlier comments redundant really.
- Bomber
- Vice Chairman
- Posts: 60413
- Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
- Has thanked: 44 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
If anything, it makes it even less imposing to the touring side, therefore pitch favours opposition! No other countries are so accommodating.God is an Englishman wrote:Commentators saying how this is not a normal waca wicket. It's not as green and a slower wicket than usual.
Makes bombers earlier comments redundant really.
Ignore this signature
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
so if you deaden a pitch it's OK, but if anyone else does its doctoring. You couldn't make this up.Bomber wrote:If anything, it makes it even less imposing to the touring side, therefore pitch favours opposition! No other countries are so accommodating.God is an Englishman wrote:Commentators saying how this is not a normal waca wicket. It's not as green and a slower wicket than usual.
Makes bombers earlier comments redundant really.
That last catch would have carried if they didn't doctor the pitch.
- Urgh! A Musíc War
- Promising Junior
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:04 am
Re: Australia v New Zealand
Australia have a tough day in the field so far today.
I hate screaming kids
-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
@ (tiresome) Hawksey
Has the WACA been prepared to counter a perceived strength of NZ?
Yes or no will suffice....
Has the WACA been prepared to counter a perceived strength of NZ?
Yes or no will suffice....
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
YesMegaBonus wrote:@ (tiresome) Hawksey
Has the WACA been prepared to counter a perceived strength of NZ?
Yes or no will suffice....
Actually No, it's been prepared to play to Australia's strengths.
- God is an Englishman
- Board Member
- Posts: 51452
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 85 times
-
- Team Manager
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:43 pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 89 times
Re: Australia v New Zealand
.God is an Englishman
MegaBonus wrote:
@ (tiresome) Hawksey
Has the WACA been prepared to counter a perceived strength of NZ?
Yes or no will suffice....
Yes
Actually No, it's been prepared to play to Australia's strengths
so which one is it????
“Hence, we will not say that Greeks fight like heroes, but that heroes fight like Greeks." Winston Churchill