FootballNews

Australia the better team by a long was but how cabernet was that ref.

?

Daijayama Matsuri wrote:?

What's your question?

I picked that up off the floor. I think it was the question mark you dropped.

Hey god is a Englishman, god must be bloody rubbish at rugby.

As effie said HOW EMBARRASMENT.

Daijayama Matsuri wrote:I picked that up off the floor. I think it was the question mark you dropped.

You don't need a question mark for a statement.

Here come the shackle draggers who wouldn't even know the first thing about rugby.

typical Aussies on a bandwagon because they're team won. If you'd lost, you'd say how you're not from the Eastern states so don't like rugby

God is an Englishman wrote:

Daijayama Matsuri wrote:I picked that up off the floor. I think it was the question mark you dropped.

You don't need a question mark for a statement.

I thought it was a rhetorical question. If I am wrong don't call me an idiot. That's a yellow card offense.

God is an Englishman wrote:Australia the better team by a long was but how cabernet was that ref.

been watching a lot of league and thought the ref was very good in comparison.

Daijayama Matsuri wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:

Daijayama Matsuri wrote:I picked that up off the floor. I think it was the question mark you dropped.

You don't need a question mark for a statement.

I thought it was a rhetorical question. If I am wrong don't call me an idiot. That's a yellow card offense.

You could call it a rhetorical question and I guess that would require a question mark. I was thinking of it more as a statement though.

Steve#4 wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:Australia the better team by a long was but how cabernet was that ref.

been watching a lot of league and thought the ref was very good in comparison.

Thought he was inconsistent with the scrums
Should have been a more severe punishment for the deliberate knock on
Punished Farrell with a yellow card for not using the arm in the tackle whilst only giving the penalty for an aussie doing the same
Gave a forward pass that came of the opposition players shoulder

Don't see how league refs can get anything wrong, they go to the TV replay for everything

Wouldn't you know it, Hooper has now been cited for that dangerous tackle on the England ruck, can't for understand how the video got Farrell sent off for the same offence but Hooper got to stay on. Video refs, they've fucked up rugby and cricket God help us if they ever bring it in for football.

End of the day England were poor and you can't expect to win games of rugby when you keep handing the ball back to the opposition. Aussies were made to look better than they are, hopefully in a couple of weeks we can all sit down with a nice cup of tea and watch the Kiwis tear them a new arse.

winners are grinner, whilst the losers are (typical poms and their whinging)

bapa wrote:winners are grinner, whilst the losers are (typical poms and their whinging)

Look it was nice for the aussies to finally beat England in a rugby world cup after years of humiliation, enjoy it while you can.

N5 1BH wrote:

bapa wrote:winners are grinner, whilst the losers are (typical poms and their whinging)

Look it was nice for the aussies to finally beat England in a rugby world cup after years of humiliation, enjoy it while you can.

He also fails to notice that we have both said that the better team won.

Then again, this is a bloke who's not even big enough to be the mascot let alone have played the game.

God is an Englishman wrote:

N5 1BH wrote:

bapa wrote:winners are grinner, whilst the losers are (typical poms and their whinging)

Look it was nice for the aussies to finally beat England in a rugby world cup after years of humiliation, enjoy it while you can.

He also fails to notice that we have both said that the better team won.

Then again, this is a bloke who's not even big enough to be the mascot let alone have played the game.

God is an Englishman wrote:

N5 1BH wrote:

bapa wrote:winners are grinner, whilst the losers are (typical poms and their whinging)

Look it was nice for the aussies to finally beat England in a rugby world cup after years of humiliation, enjoy it while you can.

He also fails to notice that we have both said that the better team won.

Then again, this is a bloke who's not even big enough to be the mascot let alone have played the game.

I think the WC should nearly always be played over there.

Not sure about these "years of humiliation" you're on about (refer above sentence)

Anyone seen Toomer lately?

bapa wrote:

Amusing considering, you're not exactly the idea weight either.

However, I could go on a diet - you'll always be a midget.

Bomber wrote:Anyone seen Toomer lately?

I see the Aussie got a 1 match ban, as I said at the time. Why have a French ref in a game involving England?

God is an Englishman wrote:I see the Aussie got a 1 match ban, as I said at the time. Why have a French ref in a game involving England?

You're making too much of his/her nationality.

Nonami Maho wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:I see the Aussie got a 1 match ban, as I said at the time. Why have a French ref in a game involving England?

You're making too much of his/her nationality.

Conincidence then that I said before the game it was wrong and he shiraz up?

Who is this u character and what makes him/her right?

Nonami Maho wrote:Who is this u character and what makes him/her right?

Should have been "I".

I did think it was odd for you to not spell you properly.

God is an Englishman wrote:I see the Aussie got a 1 match ban, as I said at the time. Why have a French ref in a game involving England?

So you want to pick the nationality of the neutral now? Would you have been happy with an Argie ref?

Bomber wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:I see the Aussie got a 1 match ban, as I said at the time. Why have a French ref in a game involving England?

So you want to pick the nationality of the neutral now? Would you have been happy with an Argie ref?

No. I would want a northern hemisphere ref (probably just the welsh though) but at a push would take a South African or a kiwi.

God is an Englishman wrote:

Bomber wrote:

God is an Englishman wrote:I see the Aussie got a 1 match ban, as I said at the time. Why have a French ref in a game involving England?

So you want to pick the nationality of the neutral now? Would you have been happy with an Argie ref?

No. I would want a northern hemisphere ref (probably just the welsh though) but at a push would take a South African or a kiwi.

We could argue the Kiwi would be against us. I suppose most (our) players would at least understand the accent a bit though.

Of course you'd understand him, you sound the same as them.

I was thinking maybe not a kiwi as it's basically it's only recently it's not been the same place.

God is an Englishman wrote:Of course you'd understand him, you sound the same as them.

I was thinking maybe not a kiwi as it's basically it's only recently it's not been the same place.

You like saying "it's" a lot.

Reckon you'll get a bonus point against Uruguay?

I think we will be up against it with Wales, having a few key players out, but still will be a huge game - loser will face All Blacks before the final.

But given we wont play the Kiwis at Eden Park, we've got a decent chance of beating them anyway, any round.