Re: Aus v India - test series
Posted: Sat Dec 01, 2018 7:03 am
I hope you didn't plan on catching the train.
Mate organizing Uber taxi for the trip in and outBodø wrote:I hope you didn't plan on catching the train.
A quick game is a good gameozzie owl wrote:India 4/42
I am going on saturday so dont want it over too quick.Mr Red wrote:A quick game is a good gameozzie owl wrote:India 4/42
I'd like it to last at least 3 days thanksMr Red wrote:A quick game is a good gameozzie owl wrote:India 4/42
Aus 3/64 so you might be rightDave from Number 12 wrote:Lol, India will still win
ozzie owl wrote:India 4/42
Long wants England to get the #1 ranking.Stitch This wrote:Pujara given out three times in an innings - three successful reviews. Is that some kind of record or just shit umpiring?
CheatsGod is an Englishman wrote:Long wants England to get the #1 ranking.Stitch This wrote:Pujara given out three times in an innings - three successful reviews. Is that some kind of record or just shit umpiring?
How so?Bomber wrote:CheatsGod is an Englishman wrote:Long wants England to get the #1 ranking.Stitch This wrote:Pujara given out three times in an innings - three successful reviews. Is that some kind of record or just shit umpiring?
One of them was my best subject.Bomber wrote:English and Maths not your strong points?
An umpire "wanting England to be #1", who happens to be a pom and giving 3 outs that weren't? Sounds fishy enough!God is an Englishman wrote:One of them was my best subject.Bomber wrote:English and Maths not your strong points?
How so?
Bomber wrote:An umpire "wanting England to be #1", who happens to be a pom and giving 3 outs that weren't? Sounds fishy enough!God is an Englishman wrote:One of them was my best subject.Bomber wrote:English and Maths not your strong points?
How so?
Collusion. Look it up. Infers plural hence cheatS.God is an Englishman wrote:
I like how you assume that just because your team was involved in an entire team of cheats (sorry just the leadership group) that other teams are as well. the comment said, Llong wanted them to win, nothingbtindo with a country cheating.
Had to you said cheat, your point would have been valid as it would have been singular. Was it your English or your maths that let you down?
They weren't "saved by it", the right decisions were made because of it.Bomber wrote:Collusion. Look it up. Infers plural hence cheatS.God is an Englishman wrote:
I like how you assume that just because your team was involved in an entire team of cheats (sorry just the leadership group) that other teams are as well. the comment said, Llong wanted them to win, nothingbtindo with a country cheating.
Had to you said cheat, your point would have been valid as it would have been singular. Was it your English or your maths that let you down?
Gee imagine if an Aussie umpire did similar. There'd be a whole new topic dedicated to it by now.
Ironic that India, hater of DRS, was saved by it.
God is an Englishman wrote:They weren't "saved by it", the right decisions were made because of it.Bomber wrote:Collusion. Look it up. Infers plural hence cheatS.God is an Englishman wrote:
I like how you assume that just because your team was involved in an entire team of cheats (sorry just the leadership group) that other teams are as well. the comment said, Llong wanted them to win, nothingbtindo with a country cheating.
Had to you said cheat, your point would have been valid as it would have been singular. Was it your English or your maths that let you down?
Gee imagine if an Aussie umpire did similar. There'd be a whole new topic dedicated to it by now.
Ironic that India, hater of DRS, was saved by it.
So you now beliebe that England bribed and umpire to let australia win. Unlike yours, my country aren't proven cheats.
A denied accusation. Never anything proven.Wayne Kerr wrote:https://www.express.co.uk/sport/rugby-u ... oody-cheat
ICC cleared him.
Wayne Kerr wrote:https://www.theroar.com.au/2011/09/30/e ... world-cup/