England cricket team lol

[God is an Englishman]

Of course they're not always right.

And on this one they were wrong. Been many grounded "catches" claimed and given, doesnt mean they are out

That's your opinion. It's wrong but you keep being the special person you are.

[God is an Englishman]

Saw it on telly last night. Clearly grassed. Umpires simply got it wrong. It happens. My only advice - GIAE is due another specsavers appointment (the other eye this time)

Your bias is showing through

What bias? It was India v england, therefore much less bias than you would have.

Wasn't even out in backyard cricket - there one hand one bounce is at least sometimes accepted, this was two hands one bounce!

You see anything anti English, just like a lot of aussies, that's obvious.

When be comes up with the ball, look at where the ball is. Clear catch.

Stop judging us by aussie standards or as per last night, kiwi standards.

[Bomber]

Saw it on telly last night. Clearly grassed. Umpires simply got it wrong. It happens. My only advice - GIAE is due another specsavers appointment (the other eye this time)

Your bias is showing through

What bias? It was India v england, therefore much less bias than you would have.

Wasn't even out in backyard cricket - there one hand one bounce is at least sometimes accepted, this was two hands one bounce!

You see anything anti English, just like a lot of aussies, that's obvious.

When be comes up with the ball, look at where the ball is. Clear catch.

Stop judging us by aussie standards or as per last night, kiwi standards.

In bold, here is where you have been shown up. What difference does it make when you come up with the ball? Anyone can "come up with the ball" after its been turfed.

This was as bad, if not worse, than Joe Root's grassed one.

[Cooper]

Saw it on telly last night. Clearly grassed. Umpires simply got it wrong. It happens. My only advice - GIAE is due another specsavers appointment (the other eye this time)

Your bias is showing through

What bias? It was India v england, therefore much less bias than you would have.

Wasn't even out in backyard cricket - there one hand one bounce is at least sometimes accepted, this was two hands one bounce!

You see anything anti English, just like a lot of aussies, that's obvious.

When be comes up with the ball, look at where the ball is. Clear catch.

Stop judging us by aussie standards or as per last night, kiwi standards.

In bold, here is where you have been shown up. What difference does it make when you come up with the ball? Anyone can "come up with the ball" after its been turfed.

This was as bad, if not worse, than Joe Root's grassed one.

Id say on par with Strauss' one lol

[Cooper]

Of course they're not always right.

And on this one they were wrong. Been many grounded "catches" claimed and given, doesnt mean they are out

That's your opinion. It's wrong but you keep being the special person you are.

Lol keep digging. Your opinion is the least taken on board of all on here. More people take note of Grosso's than yours lol

[God is an Englishman]

Saw it on telly last night. Clearly grassed. Umpires simply got it wrong. It happens. My only advice - GIAE is due another specsavers appointment (the other eye this time)

Your bias is showing through

What bias? It was India v england, therefore much less bias than you would have.

Wasn't even out in backyard cricket - there one hand one bounce is at least sometimes accepted, this was two hands one bounce!

You see anything anti English, just like a lot of aussies, that's obvious.

When be comes up with the ball, look at where the ball is. Clear catch.

Stop judging us by aussie standards or as per last night, kiwi standards.

In bold, here is where you have been shown up. What difference does it make when you come up with the ball? Anyone can "come up with the ball" after its been turfed.

This was as bad, if not worse, than Joe Root's grassed one.

It's high up on his wrist, so it can only have got there if it was there to start with.

[God is an Englishman]

Of course they're not always right.

And on this one they were wrong. Been many grounded "catches" claimed and given, doesnt mean they are out

That's your opinion. It's wrong but you keep being the special person you are.

Lol keep digging. Your opinion is the least taken on board of all on here. More people take note of Grosso's than yours lol

In your opinion.

[Cooper]

Of course they're not always right.

And on this one they were wrong. Been many grounded "catches" claimed and given, doesnt mean they are out

That's your opinion. It's wrong but you keep being the special person you are.

Lol keep digging. Your opinion is the least taken on board of all on here. More people take note of Grosso's than yours lol

In your opinion.

Yep which im sure many agree with lol

[Bomber]

Saw it on telly last night. Clearly grassed. Umpires simply got it wrong. It happens. My only advice - GIAE is due another specsavers appointment (the other eye this time)

Your bias is showing through

What bias? It was India v england, therefore much less bias than you would have.

Wasn't even out in backyard cricket - there one hand one bounce is at least sometimes accepted, this was two hands one bounce!

You see anything anti English, just like a lot of aussies, that's obvious.

When be comes up with the ball, look at where the ball is. Clear catch.

Stop judging us by aussie standards or as per last night, kiwi standards.

In bold, here is where you have been shown up. What difference does it make when you come up with the ball? Anyone can "come up with the ball" after its been turfed.

This was as bad, if not worse, than Joe Root's grassed one.

It's high up on his wrist, so it can only have got there if it was there to start with.

Thank god you're not a lawyer as no-one would ever hire you. It can get there after a bounce, quite easily, which is the case here.

[God is an Englishman]

So, it was in his hand, bounced on the grass and happened to land in an unnatural position like that past closed hands.

This is almost as strange and when you claimed an Englishman had managed to catch a ball and then dug a hole for his fingers to go into in order for the ball to have hit the ground.

Have you ever caught a cricket ball or are you just trolling to be anti English.

#tallpoppysyndrome
#smallcountrysyndrome

[Bomber]

So, it was in his hand, bounced on the grass and happened to land in an unnatural position like that past closed hands.

This is almost as strange and when you claimed an Englishman had managed to catch a ball and then dug a hole for his fingers to go into in order for the ball to have hit the ground.

Have you ever caught a cricket ball or are you just trolling to be anti English.

#tallpoppysyndrome
#smallcountrysyndrome

Now you're slowly cottoning on. Forget where the ball finishes up, it's all irrelevant once it touches the ground before the action is complete. Simple

[God is an Englishman]

OK then I look forward to seeing the video of this happening. If not, I'll go with the far more likely event that this didn't happen.

[Bomber]

OK then I look forward to seeing the video of this happening. If not, I'll go with the far more likely event that this didn't happen.

So you haven't seen the footage? You're kidding me right?

[God is an Englishman]

OK then I look forward to seeing the video of this happening. If not, I'll go with the far more likely event that this didn't happen.

So you haven't seen the footage? You're kidding me right?

I haven't seen the footage that shows the ball bouncing and landing in between his wrists.

[Cooper]

There have been many incidents of this type of thing in cricket across the world and the large majority of them should not have been given out just like this one.

Some peoples extreme bias gets in the way of seeing the truth though. You can guarantee if this exact situation happened to the Australian team GAIE and Co would say it was not out and a grounded catch lol

[God is an Englishman]

There have been many incidents of this type of thing in cricket across the world and the large majority of them should not have been given out just like this one.

Some peoples extreme bias gets in the way of seeing the truth though. You can guarantee if this exact situation happened to the Australian team GAIE and Co would say it was not out and a grounded catch lol

So you admit your bias?

I don't really care about Australia though, unless they're playing England.

[Cooper]

There have been many incidents of this type of thing in cricket across the world and the large majority of them should not have been given out just like this one.

Some peoples extreme bias gets in the way of seeing the truth though. You can guarantee if this exact situation happened to the Australian team GAIE and Co would say it was not out and a grounded catch lol

So you admit your bias?

I don't really care about Australia though, unless they're playing England.

Where did i admit my bias?

I said quite the opposite lol, i am unbias in these situation and we all know your surely are not lol

[God is an Englishman]

You appear to have avoided my question.

[Cooper]

You appear to have avoided my question.

Second line answered it. I have no bias lol

You've avoided mine lol

[God is an Englishman]

You appear to have avoided my question.

Second line answered it. I have no bias lol

You've avoided mine lol

A simple yes or No was needed.

Can you show the unanswered question?

[Cooper]

You appear to have avoided my question.

Second line answered it. I have no bias lol

You've avoided mine lol

A simple yes or No was needed.

Can you show the unanswered question?

Its right here lol

Where did i admit my bias?
I said quite the opposite lol, i am unbias in these situation and we all know your surely are not lol

[God is an Englishman]

See how easy out is to show an unanswered question when there is one.


Of course I am biased.

[God is an Englishman]

So, if you are claiming that you are not biased despite discussing others being biased.

How would I be biased if it was australia playing (assuming it's not against England)?

[Cooper]

See how easy out is to show an unanswered question when there is one.


Of course I am biased.

Glad you admit you are biased, we knew it anyway.

You would say it was a grounded ball and not a catch.

Do you honestly think you would say otherwise?

[God is an Englishman]

See how easy out is to show an unanswered question when there is one.


Of course I am biased.

Glad you admit you are biased, we knew it anyway.

You would say it was a grounded ball and not a catch.

Do you honestly think you would say otherwise?

I don't know until I see this australian catch.

[God is an Englishman]

How would I be biased if it was australia playing (assuming it's not against England)?

[Cooper]

How would I be biased if it was australia playing (assuming it's not against England)?

Since i know you have trouble reading things the first time ill answer it again for you

You would say it was a grounded ball and not a catch.

[God is an Englishman]

How would I be biased if it was australia playing (assuming it's not against England)?

Since i know you have trouble reading things the first time ill answer it again for you

You would say it was a grounded ball and not a catch.

NO, that's a statement of what you THINK I would do. You have failed to answer why I would be biased against Australia.

[Cooper]

How would I be biased if it was australia playing (assuming it's not against England)?

Since i know you have trouble reading things the first time ill answer it again for you

You would say it was a grounded ball and not a catch.

NO, that's a statement of what you THINK I would do. You have failed to answer why I would be biased against Australia.

You were given a scenario of what would happen which shows your bias, not my problem you dont like it lol

[Bomber]

Giae has previously claimed when Australia was playing India that he would barrack for India, so is there not some subtle form of 'bias against Australia" (when england isnt playing)?