Moderators: Randoman, Ernie Cooksey, Forum Admins
bloodypassit wrote:Wasnt Beefy dropped from the English camp for drug usage on a Caribbean tourGod is an Englishman wrote:
If drug cheat said you'd win then he was playing the patriotic card or he was just following his commentary style of just copying what the bloke next to him has just said. Beefy has said he was taking the piss when he said 5-0, he was taking the piss out of McGrath. And yes, he said he was taking the piss before the series started.
it was illegalGod is an Englishman wrote:bloodypassit wrote:Wasnt Beefy dropped from the English camp for drug usage on a Caribbean tourGod is an Englishman wrote:
If drug cheat said you'd win then he was playing the patriotic card or he was just following his commentary style of just copying what the bloke next to him has just said. Beefy has said he was taking the piss when he said 5-0, he was taking the piss out of McGrath. And yes, he said he was taking the piss before the series started.
Did he use a banned substance?
Did he use a banned substance?bloodypassit wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:it was illegalbloodypassit wrote: Did he use a banned substance?
Don't count on it. The poms are cabernet at taking advantage of having us on the ropes. 5/201 now. Haddin has been great this series.Bomber wrote:I used to use it to help get rid of headaches.
4/94 at lunch. Maybe THIS TIME we might have a close test?
Maybe given england have gone without a Root this time, they may play with a bit more aggression.....
Bomber wrote:I used to use it to help get rid of headaches.
4/94 at lunch. Maybe THIS TIME we might have a close test?
Maybe given england have gone without a Root this time, they may play with a bit more aggression.....
MegaBonus wrote:Gee, now they're feigning injury just to slow the runs.....pathetic....
it's a test match, not a 20/20.Bomber wrote:326 all out, pretty good for a team that got sent in. Not bad scoring rate, 4.29, something the poms could only dream of after so many overs.
Have no idea how old their parents areGod is an Englishman wrote:Bacon888 wrote:England hand debut caps to a Zimbabwean & a Northern Irishman for the Sydney Test.
What's their parentage?
Our tail starts at Siddle. Yours starts after KP........God is an Englishman wrote:it's a test match, not a 20/20.Bomber wrote:326 all out, pretty good for a team that got sent in. Not bad scoring rate, 4.29, something the poms could only dream of after so many overs.
326 brilliant from where you were. Annoying to once again be letting your tail wag.
Bomber wrote:Our tail starts at Siddle. Yours starts after KP........God is an Englishman wrote:it's a test match, not a 20/20.Bomber wrote:326 all out, pretty good for a team that got sent in. Not bad scoring rate, 4.29, something the poms could only dream of after so many overs.
326 brilliant from where you were. Annoying to once again be letting your tail wag.
Will England be able to match this score at least once this match?God is an Englishman wrote:it's a test match, not a 20/20.Bomber wrote:326 all out, pretty good for a team that got sent in. Not bad scoring rate, 4.29, something the poms could only dream of after so many overs.
326 brilliant from where you were. Annoying to once again be letting your tail wag.
+ + + + Still looked inconclusive. I guess you can give them all a few chances and we'd still be ok.MegaBonus wrote:Honest Haddin throws some sympathy to the Poms......
Bomber wrote:Still looked inconclusive. I guess you can give them all a few chances and we'd still be ok.MegaBonus wrote:Honest Haddin throws some sympathy to the Poms......
Looks like Anderson is the answer at no 3 for england. After all, he outscored Carberry, Bell and KP.
The Smith c. Cook looked bordeline !God is an Englishman wrote:Bomber wrote:Still looked inconclusive. I guess you can give them all a few chances and we'd still be ok.MegaBonus wrote:Honest Haddin throws some sympathy to the Poms......
Looks like Anderson is the answer at no 3 for england. After all, he outscored Carberry, Bell and KP.
Inconclusive? Haha!!
swannsong wrote:The Smith c. Cook looked bordeline !
Rogers - you did mate, shiraz off to the pavilion.To be fair to Haddin, he did shrug his shoulders as to whether it had carried or not....haven't seen too many replays of the Cook catch yet...just going on first-second viewing.God is an Englishman wrote:swannsong wrote:The Smith c. Cook looked bordeline !
similar to the Haddin catch, not even close.
Liked him standing there, I didn't hit it
swannsong wrote:To be fair to Haddin, he did shrug his shoulders as to whether it had carried or not....haven't seen too many replays of the Cook catch yet...just going on first-second viewing.God is an Englishman wrote:swannsong wrote:The Smith c. Cook looked bordeline !
similar to the Haddin catch, not even close.
Liked him standing there, I didn't hit it
ozzie owl wrote:About the only thing they did today.Electrafixion wrote:Well done England to avoid being forced to follow on.
I'll have to take your word on that oneGod is an Englishman wrote: yes haddin did, looked to clearly hit the ground first. Good on him for being honest.
Cook's was straight in the hands - absolutely clear cut.
