Re: SANFL
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 2:53 pm
Yes, doing a Leicester City in reverse. Mind you the second quarter today was pretty good.A few weeks ago The Bloods wrote:So has the football.
Page 5 of 6
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 9:54 am
Westies lost a lot of players this season though - always gunna be hard.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2016 9:12 pm
Today finally notched up a win.PDog wrote:Westies lost a lot of players this season though - always gunna be hard.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:15 pm
About time!
I was happy to see the Dogs knock off Norwood...
I was happy to see the Dogs knock off Norwood...
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Jun 26, 2016 3:59 am
Two on the trot now, but almost threw away a big lead on both occasions to just hold on.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 11:37 am
All good things come to an end eventually.The Bloods wrote:Two on the trot now, but almost threw away a big lead on both occasions to just hold on.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 11:49 am
I know which one the eagles would have preferred to win.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 12:43 pm
SANFL has reached a new low today , with their constant changing of fixtures . Today's reserve match West vs North reserves no umpires arrived.......game delayed by 1 hour with 2 field umpires and a spectator as a goal umpire....
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sat Aug 20, 2016 1:44 pm
Obviously you are confused.bloodypassit wrote:SANFL has reached a new low today , with their constant changing of fixtures . Today's reserve match West vs North reserves no umpires arrived.......game delayed by 1 hour with 2 field umpires and a spectator as a goal umpire....
These things only happen with the FFSA and SAASL.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:07 am
The umpires that didn't show should be fined and dropped to lower grades for at least a month at half pay. Lets see how often it happens then. And yes, same should apply to FFSA etc.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:12 am
I remember being asked to run the line at a Croatia v Macedonia game a few years ago by the referee after one of the official linesmen who showed up decided he didn't feel up to the task of doing it.bloodypassit wrote:SANFL has reached a new low today , with their constant changing of fixtures . Today's reserve match West vs North reserves no umpires arrived.......game delayed by 1 hour with 2 field umpires and a spectator as a goal umpire....
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:26 am
You should have been compensated whatever his match payment was.The Bluehearts wrote:I remember being asked to run the line at a Croatia v Macedonia game a few years ago by the referee after one of the official linesmen who showed up decided he didn't feel up to the task of doing it.bloodypassit wrote:SANFL has reached a new low today , with their constant changing of fixtures . Today's reserve match West vs North reserves no umpires arrived.......game delayed by 1 hour with 2 field umpires and a spectator as a goal umpire....
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2016 11:36 am
The thought never even crossed my mind.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 2:22 pm
The Appointment sheets given to the umpires stated the game was being played on SundayBomber wrote:The umpires that didn't show should be fined and dropped to lower grades for at least a month at half pay. Lets see how often it happens then. And yes, same should apply to FFSA etc.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:21 pm
Then admin responsible should be sacked (unless is volunteer).bloodypassit wrote:The Appointment sheets given to the umpires stated the game was being played on SundayBomber wrote:The umpires that didn't show should be fined and dropped to lower grades for at least a month at half pay. Lets see how often it happens then. And yes, same should apply to FFSA etc.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:13 pm
I guess the players who didn't show up on sunday should be fined too.bloodypassit wrote:The Appointment sheets given to the umpires stated the game was being played on SundayBomber wrote:The umpires that didn't show should be fined and dropped to lower grades for at least a month at half pay. Lets see how often it happens then. And yes, same should apply to FFSA etc.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:32 pm
Good luck to WWT Eagles on Sunday. Boo Sturt, boooo! 
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:35 pm
Great premiership win by The Double Blues .Bomber wrote:Good luck to WWT Eagles on Sunday. Boo Sturt, boooo!
Re: SANFL
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 9:38 pm
If the last two seasons is anything to go by third place is the new champions.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 8:57 am
It's a Grand old flag, Its a high-flying flag
It's the emblem for me and for you
It's the emblem of the team we love
The team of the old Double Blues
Every heart beats true for the old Double Blues
As we sing this song to you..........what do we sing?
Should old acquaintance be forgot
Keep your eye on the old Double Blues
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:31 am
Such an "original" tune........how many teams share this one?Wayne Kerr wrote:It's a Grand old flag, Its a high-flying flag
It's the emblem for me and for you
It's the emblem of the team we love
The team of the old Double Blues
Every heart beats true for the old Double Blues
As we sing this song to you..........what do we sing?
Should old acquaintance be forgot
Keep your eye on the old Double Blues
After yesterday I can say that Sturt supporters are funny. Odd/funny, not haha funny.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:46 pm
^^^^^^^^
Haters gonna Hate
2016 Premiers!
Haters gonna Hate
2016 Premiers!
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:34 pm
No hate, just observation about oddness. Where are these Sturt people week in week out I wonder? Most I spoke to haven't been to see them once all season - until yesterday. Ultimate bandwagon!
Re: SANFL
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2017 12:26 pm
Good win last weekend.The Bloods wrote:Today finally notched up a win.PDog wrote:Westies lost a lot of players this season though - always gunna be hard.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:08 pm
Seven wins in a row for the Double Blues.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:31 am
I've heard of teams relishing their "19th man" and usually refer to this as their supporters. Not at North Adelaide Roosters! 
Norwood would be loving all this.
Norwood would be loving all this.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:24 pm
As a roosters supporter I was so excited at the final siren but now I'm extremely uncomfortable at the whole scenario.Bomber wrote:I've heard of teams relishing their "19th man" and usually refer to this as their supporters. Not at North Adelaide Roosters!
Norwood would be loving all this.
I think being labelled cheats is very over-the-top as it seems to have been just a mistake.
That said, the right decision is to award the result to the Eagles
Hopefully the Redlegs win next Sunday so there's no tainted premiership
Re: SANFL
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:42 am
Cant believe they awarded the game to North. Sets a dangerous precedence.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:18 am
4 points off next season, $10k fine and no right of appeal in any shape.
What a joke. Midas well just cheat in the important games and just cope a small punishment and go through to play for the Trophy. I hope they get destroyed and made o look like kids in the final.
What a joke. Midas well just cheat in the important games and just cope a small punishment and go through to play for the Trophy. I hope they get destroyed and made o look like kids in the final.
Re: SANFL
Posted: Thu Sep 20, 2018 10:11 am
I never thought I'd say this but I hope norwood win.