Bomber wrote:Call it what you like, Australia still beat England in the men's hockey.
a girls sport
That men play probably more than women. They call football (soccer) a girl's sport in USA. I dont care what they think about that either. Our blokes knocked off your blokes in a world-wide recognized sport. All that matters.
Bomber wrote:Call it what you like, Australia still beat England in the men's hockey.
a girls sport
That men play probably more than women. They call football (soccer) a girl's sport in USA. I dont care what they think about that either. Our blokes knocked off your blokes in a world-wide recognized sport. All that matters.
the yanks can say what they want, my opinion is all I care about.
The fact remains that when you speak about girls sports you somehow went quiet when England beat australian.
Simple question - hockey is played by
1. Men
2. Women
I'll help you out
Both equally (in fact I reckon more blokes play it than girls).
Ice hockey - is that a sport predominantly played by men or women?
I gave my opinion, if you think it's wrong. PROVE IT!
Either way, recent revelations suggest they were probably juiced up for the win anyway. A country without credibility cannot claim any win without suspicion now
Armageddon wrote:No Bomber you support the other big cheats of AFL.
The juiced up rocket fueled Bombers!
Hope they are found guilty & get a points deduction !
So who did what? You seem to know everything about it.......and how does one cheat when they got beaten so often?
Armageddon wrote:No Bomber you support the other big cheats of AFL.
The juiced up rocket fueled Bombers!
Hope they are found guilty & get a points deduction !
So who did what? You seem to know everything about it.......and how does one cheat when they got beaten so often?
Armageddon wrote:No Bomber you support the other big cheats of AFL.
The juiced up rocket fueled Bombers!
Hope they are found guilty & get a points deduction !
So who did what? You seem to know everything about it.......and how does one cheat when they got beaten so often?
is it only cheating when you win then?
May as well be. How do you otherwise gain "an unfair advantage" as would be defined by the word "cheating."?
Point being cos the media hype, brainwaves such as armageddon instantly assumes its all gospel and that the entire team cheated. If Essendon performed like that "on the juice" every season and came tenth, who would really care, except for Bombers supporters themselves?
I'm actually pissed off to think that if they DID juice up, they should have won a lot more games. Then again, maybe others were similarly "juiced up" - time will tell.
teams make it into finals on percentage. So losing by less of an amount is still cheating and can gain you an advantage.
Trust an aussie to try to redefine cheating, you've been great at it for years but you've now been caught and what the rest of the world has known for years is out in the open.
Remember how you jumped up and down about those chinese swimmers. Guess you just didn't have as good a supplier!
God is an Englishman wrote:teams make it into finals on percentage. So losing by less of an amount is still cheating and can gain you an advantage.
Trust an aussie to try to redefine cheating, you've been great at it for years but you've now been caught and what the rest of the world has known for years is out in the open.
Remember how you jumped up and down about those chinese swimmers. Guess you just didn't have as good a supplier!
"You" jumping up and down? Insert the word "media" and you'd be more accurate.
