God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:03 pm
Well as per the above, you have tried to claim you have cricket knowledge by bringing up an old story about the actual person. As I also said, I'm not buying it.
I would think you wouldn't stand by it as you will have seen how silly you look by doing the above.
Couldn't care less if you don't buy it, that's not my problem at all. Your opinion is completely irrelevant.
Look silly? What are you on about now?
I stand by it even more since it clearly gets on your nerves lol
Keep going if you want, but keep in mind how irrelevant your opinion is to anyone.
Your opinion on my opinion being irrelevant though is irrelevant as your opinion is irrelevant
God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:03 pm
Well as per the above, you have tried to claim you have cricket knowledge by bringing up an old story about the actual person. As I also said, I'm not buying it.
I would think you wouldn't stand by it as you will have seen how silly you look by doing the above.
Couldn't care less if you don't buy it, that's not my problem at all. Your opinion is completely irrelevant.
Look silly? What are you on about now?
I stand by it even more since it clearly gets on your nerves lol
Keep going if you want, but keep in mind how irrelevant your opinion is to anyone.
Your opinion on my opinion being irrelevant though is irrelevant as your opinion is irrelevant
Yes, look silly.
I'm on about you looking silly.
Get in my nerves, what makes you think that?
What's the capital of Peru?
wow the only one looking silly is you after that childish post.
You replying to it in the first place shows it did.
And yet another random question for some ego inflation, yawn you are too predictable.
God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:03 pm
Well as per the above, you have tried to claim you have cricket knowledge by bringing up an old story about the actual person. As I also said, I'm not buying it.
I would think you wouldn't stand by it as you will have seen how silly you look by doing the above.
Couldn't care less if you don't buy it, that's not my problem at all. Your opinion is completely irrelevant.
Look silly? What are you on about now?
I stand by it even more since it clearly gets on your nerves lol
Keep going if you want, but keep in mind how irrelevant your opinion is to anyone.
Your opinion on my opinion being irrelevant though is irrelevant as your opinion is irrelevant
Yes, look silly.
I'm on about you looking silly.
Get in my nerves, what makes you think that?
What's the capital of Peru?
wow the only one looking silly is you after that childish post.
You replying to it in the first place shows it did.
And yet another random question for some ego inflation, yawn you are too predictable.
God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:03 pm
Well as per the above, you have tried to claim you have cricket knowledge by bringing up an old story about the actual person. As I also said, I'm not buying it.
I would think you wouldn't stand by it as you will have seen how silly you look by doing the above.
Couldn't care less if you don't buy it, that's not my problem at all. Your opinion is completely irrelevant.
Look silly? What are you on about now?
I stand by it even more since it clearly gets on your nerves lol
Keep going if you want, but keep in mind how irrelevant your opinion is to anyone.
Your opinion on my opinion being irrelevant though is irrelevant as your opinion is irrelevant
Yes, look silly.
I'm on about you looking silly.
Get in my nerves, what makes you think that?
What's the capital of Peru?
wow the only one looking silly is you after that childish post.
You replying to it in the first place shows it did.
And yet another random question for some ego inflation, yawn you are too predictable.
Post by God is an Englishman » Wed Dec 08, 2021 4:19 pm
MegaBonus wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 4:03 pm
^^^^^^^^
creating controversy when there is none....looks like youre hedging your bets...
Are you suggesting it isn't green. Even aussie commentators have said it's "UNDER PREPARED".
are you suggesting its purposely underprepared????
No, I'm suggesting some may suggest it was if it had happened in any other country.
Your lot won the toss. Why didn't you bowl first then? And play Broad/Anderson? If anything, these were ideal english conditions.
Broad was a strange one but I understand Anderson.
Ask Hussein why you don't bat first at the Gabba no matter how "under prepared" the wicket is?
It was a good toss to lose.
So it didn't work out for Hussein all those years ago. Does that mean you will never bowl first there again ever? Teams have won batting second there you know.
God is an Englishman wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 6:03 pm
Well as per the above, you have tried to claim you have cricket knowledge by bringing up an old story about the actual person. As I also said, I'm not buying it.
I would think you wouldn't stand by it as you will have seen how silly you look by doing the above.
Couldn't care less if you don't buy it, that's not my problem at all. Your opinion is completely irrelevant.
Look silly? What are you on about now?
I stand by it even more since it clearly gets on your nerves lol
Keep going if you want, but keep in mind how irrelevant your opinion is to anyone.
Your opinion on my opinion being irrelevant though is irrelevant as your opinion is irrelevant
Yes, look silly.
I'm on about you looking silly.
Get in my nerves, what makes you think that?
What's the capital of Peru?
wow the only one looking silly is you after that childish post.
You replying to it in the first place shows it did.
And yet another random question for some ego inflation, yawn you are too predictable.
Keep going. No one's listening anymore lol
You have missed the questions again?
Question*
And?
No, it's clearly questions. You use an S at the end on a lot of occasions when using the plural.
I am merely letting you know you have missed them and giving you an opportunity to not be seen as running away AGAIN.
Post by God is an Englishman » Wed Dec 08, 2021 4:19 pm
Are you suggesting it isn't green. Even aussie commentators have said it's "UNDER PREPARED".
are you suggesting its purposely underprepared????
No, I'm suggesting some may suggest it was if it had happened in any other country.
Your lot won the toss. Why didn't you bowl first then? And play Broad/Anderson? If anything, these were ideal english conditions.
Broad was a strange one but I understand Anderson.
Ask Hussein why you don't bat first at the Gabba no matter how "under prepared" the wicket is?
It was a good toss to lose.
So it didn't work out for Hussein all those years ago. Does that mean you will never bowl first there again ever? Teams have won batting second there you know.
At the Gabba if you win the toss, you get. If you're unsure about it, then you bat. If you're really not sure then you chat to the coach and your vice captain and then you bat.
Cummins also said he would have batted.
As I said good toss to lose because if you get chosen to bowl you don't have the pressure to take wickets.
Bacon8 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 11:05 am
Bahahah Stokes
Got ask WTF the umpire was doing as that was not the first no-ball he had bowled in the over.
Said to a mate, that's the issue with umpires not calling them. You don't know you're overstepping until it's too late.
It's cost England a wicket and australia some runs.
Didnt cost england a wicket at all. Did cost Australia some runs though, but it is poor umpiring in that they should be calling the obvious ones on the spot.
I did laugh though.
Bacon8 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 11:05 am
Bahahah Stokes
Got ask WTF the umpire was doing as that was not the first no-ball he had bowled in the over.
Said to a mate, that's the issue with umpires not calling them. You don't know you're overstepping until it's too late.
It's cost England a wicket and australia some runs.
Didnt cost england a wicket at all. Did cost Australia some runs though, but it is poor umpiring in that they should be calling the ĺobvious ones on the spot.
I did laugh though.
Bacon8 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 11:05 am
Bahahah Stokes
Got ask WTF the umpire was doing as that was not the first no-ball he had bowled in the over.
Said to a mate, that's the issue with umpires not calling them. You don't know you're overstepping until it's too late.
It's cost England a wicket and australia some runs.
Didnt cost england a wicket at all. Did cost Australia some runs though, but it is poor umpiring in that they should be calling the ĺobvious ones on the spot.
I did laugh though.
Of course it cost a wicket.
I can't believe Warner is still there.
You don't get wickets from no-balls (unless run out etc). Learn to bowl legally
Bacon8 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 09, 2021 11:05 am
Bahahah Stokes
Got ask WTF the umpire was doing as that was not the first no-ball he had bowled in the over.
Said to a mate, that's the issue with umpires not calling them. You don't know you're overstepping until it's too late.
It's cost England a wicket and australia some runs.
Didnt cost england a wicket at all. Did cost Australia some runs though, but it is poor umpiring in that they should be calling the ĺobvious ones on the spot.
I did laugh though.
Of course it cost a wicket.
I can't believe Warner is still there.
You don't get wickets from no-balls (unless run out etc). Learn to bowl legally