Re: Matildos not as good as they thought
Posted: Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:12 pm
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
FootballNews v3
http://www.footballnews.com.au/forum/
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
Migrant Land wrote:Bomber wrote:Foreign language, that's a laugh. Most haven't a clue about English anyway, so anything else wouldn't be much different.
1,3,5, get yourselves a room
Stay and try to improve things?ozzie owl wrote:If someone lives in Australia and they hate everything about it so much , there is a very simple solution.Stitch This wrote:Migrant Land, Grosso, zzz, cornetto
A bunch of misogynist faaaarken immigrants that can't assimilate.
If you don't like it, leave!
...Grosso Mk II wrote:evidence of 'misogyny' leftist?Stitch This wrote:Migrant Land, Grosso, zzz, cornetto
A bunch of misogynist faaaarken immigrants that can't assimilate.
If you don't like it, leave!
You've left the roomMigrant Land wrote:The Geniuses at the FFA who know fkall get what they deserve.
You're next Greg the dog
No, just woken up to what I expected.ozzie owl wrote:Quiet this morning Migrant Land ?
Oh yes , notice the pattern every time the Matildos or socceroos get eliminated :B.Toomer wrote:Weren't the aussies "brave" though?
Migrant Land wrote:Oh yes , notice the pattern every time the Matildos or socceroos get eliminated :B.Toomer wrote:Weren't the aussies "brave" though?
'Brave'
'Unlucky'
'Heartbreaking'
'Referee cost them'
'Not quite good enough'
'Falling behind in player development'
'FFSA needs to get serious about development'
And this exit was their worst ever at a World Cup.
And yet the overpaid,under-knowledged fat cat administrators continue on their merry way , with another junket just around the corner.
Such as...eagleboy wrote:The Ref and VAR made a few interesting decisions
Whenever England failed in the big tournaments these were often trotted out:Migrant Land wrote:Oh yes , notice the pattern every time the Matildos or socceroos get eliminated :B.Toomer wrote:Weren't the aussies "brave" though?
'Brave'
'Unlucky'
'Heartbreaking'
'Referee cost them'
'Not quite good enough'
'Falling behind in player development'
'FFSA needs to get serious about development'
And this exit was their worst ever at a World Cup.
And yet the overpaid,under-knowledged fat cat administrators continue on their merry way , with another junket just around the corner.
you not see the game?Eyjafjallajökull wrote:Such as...eagleboy wrote:The Ref and VAR made a few interesting decisions
A shirt pull should be a red card anywhere on the pitch, really. You wouldn't have any players left at the end of the game.Eyjafjallajökull wrote:
4. How was that not a foul? It's a clear shirt pull. There's no way you can accidentally grab an opponent's shirt. It's a deliberate action and cheating. Should be a red card anywhere on the pitch. You can't cry because you got caught cheating.
Or perhaps players will curb their actions. Can you name an instance where pulling your opponent's shirt is justified?eagleboy wrote:A shirt pull should be a red card anywhere on the pitch, really. You wouldn't have any players left at the end of the game.
I only saw one player grab a shirt.eagleboy wrote:In the case as mentioned, both player were holding/pushing.
OPSM can helpEyjafjallajökull wrote:I only saw one player grab a shirt.eagleboy wrote:In the case as mentioned, both player were holding/pushing.
Sad thing is she didnt need toEyjafjallajökull wrote:I only saw one player grab a shirt.eagleboy wrote:In the case as mentioned, both player were holding/pushing.
Scores from overnight Grosso ?Grosso Mk II wrote:lost to a bunch of cross country skiers and canoeists
cue the media and all the SJW sycophants telling us about the Aussie never say die attitude
Probably hit the mark OM.Royal commission may be a bit overboard but some open to public investigation is required. How much taxpayer money is going to salaries of all the do gooders and hangers-on people in there for the wrong reasons. Probably stopping funds being diverted to grass roots.Old Master wrote:The blame for the Matilda's downfall is not the fault of the Referee or match officials, or even the players and coaches, it is entirely due to the FFA Board and their constant Interference in team affairs of every national squad.
Their continual interference and efforts to destabilise the players caused the national Men's Coach, Ange Postecoglu to resign just three months before the World Cup and look what happened then - another monumental failure.
They sacked Stajic and didn't have the guts to say why, other than making mealy mouth statements and refusing to discuss their reasoning - same result.
As I've said before, the FFA receives a lot of funding from the Federal and State governments, that's the Taxpayers, me and you and we have a right to be informed of what the F52k is going on - a Royal Commission must be mounted to investigate the actions and reasoning of the FFA and the State Associations and why they always manage to seize defeat from the Jaws of Victory.