Grosso wrote:We always beat Germany.
You're consistently wrong.
Moderators: BillShankly, arxidi, ruud, Judge Judy, Forum Admins
YesMegaBonus wrote:@ Hawksey
based on the follow stats and anything else you may want to bring up, do you still disagree with my assertion that England cant be referred to as a 'footballing power'?
Chris Coleman's side have won as many knockout games at an international tournament (2) as England have in the past 20 years.
Wales beat Northern Ireland and Belgium in the past week, while in the past 20 years, England beat Denmark in the last-16 of the 2002 World Cup, and Ecuador at the same stage of the 2006 World Cup.
England long gone as footbal power since 1966 , only two SF appearances ( one WC and one Euro ) in 50 years.MegaBonus wrote:based on what?????????
Based on the fact that we invented the game. That will mean we're always a powerhouse.MegaBonus wrote:based on what?????????
England were poorly managed as it was clear a week before the tournament he didn't know his best formation or best XI. As for the players, good but no greats, lets be honest how many would start for France or Germany?magnet wrote:England were fourth favourites for the tournament. When you look back at previous tournament results there is absolutely nothing to suggest they would get anywhere near the final. Evra and Ozil just two players saying they fancied England to win it. England have a good team on paper but unfortunately they can't pick a manager with half a brain in his nut!
I agree, I doubt many would make it. But the fact Schweinsteiger plays for Germany shows how shortsighted England are. The guy had a nightmare season for United and he would not be anywhere near the England team based on his club form. But he plays a pivotal role for Germany and they select the best team rather than the best individuals.ozzie owl wrote:England were poorly managed as it was clear a week before the tournament he didn't know his best formation or best XI. As for the players, good but no greats, lets be honest how many would start for France or Germany?magnet wrote:England were fourth favourites for the tournament. When you look back at previous tournament results there is absolutely nothing to suggest they would get anywhere near the final. Evra and Ozil just two players saying they fancied England to win it. England have a good team on paper but unfortunately they can't pick a manager with half a brain in his nut!
+1magnet wrote:I agree, I doubt many would make it. But the fact Schweinsteiger plays for Germany shows how shortsighted England are. The guy had a nightmare season for United and he would not be anywhere near the England team based on his club form. But he plays a pivotal role for Germany and they select the best team rather than the best individuals.ozzie owl wrote:England were poorly managed as it was clear a week before the tournament he didn't know his best formation or best XI. As for the players, good but no greats, lets be honest how many would start for France or Germany?magnet wrote:England were fourth favourites for the tournament. When you look back at previous tournament results there is absolutely nothing to suggest they would get anywhere near the final. Evra and Ozil just two players saying they fancied England to win it. England have a good team on paper but unfortunately they can't pick a manager with half a brain in his nut!
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk.
I doubt many would have a German or French passport.ozzie owl wrote:England were poorly managed as it was clear a week before the tournament he didn't know his best formation or best XI. As for the players, good but no greats, lets be honest how many would start for France or Germany?magnet wrote:England were fourth favourites for the tournament. When you look back at previous tournament results there is absolutely nothing to suggest they would get anywhere near the final. Evra and Ozil just two players saying they fancied England to win it. England have a good team on paper but unfortunately they can't pick a manager with half a brain in his nut!
Reminds how England to keep Gerrard and Lampard in the team in the old 442 formation, pushed players like Scholes and Joe Cole into wide left positions.magnet wrote:I agree, I doubt many would make it. But the fact Schweinsteiger plays for Germany shows how shortsighted England are. The guy had a nightmare season for United and he would not be anywhere near the England team based on his club form. But he plays a pivotal role for Germany and they select the best team rather than the best individuals.ozzie owl wrote:England were poorly managed as it was clear a week before the tournament he didn't know his best formation or best XI. As for the players, good but no greats, lets be honest how many would start for France or Germany?magnet wrote:England were fourth favourites for the tournament. When you look back at previous tournament results there is absolutely nothing to suggest they would get anywhere near the final. Evra and Ozil just two players saying they fancied England to win it. England have a good team on paper but unfortunately they can't pick a manager with half a brain in his nut!
God is an Englishman
MegaBonus wrote:
based on what?????????
Based on the fact that we invented the game. That will mean we're always a powerhouse.
Yet, you know I'm right.MegaBonus wrote:God is an Englishman
MegaBonus wrote:
based on what?????????
Based on the fact that we invented the game. That will mean we're always a powerhouse.
oh my.......how
struggling to cope with the reality of inadequacy....
Boomerang? Can't throw them awayB.Toomer wrote:That's because australia has invented shiraz all of any importance
"The game is about glory, doing things in style and with a flourish, going out and beating the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."Victor Meldrew wrote:A decent govt..... like uk.
Really ?B.Toomer wrote:That's because australia has invented shiraz all of any importance
Does it include a retractable washing line? How would we live without that.ozzie owl wrote:Really ?B.Toomer wrote:That's because australia has invented shiraz all of any importance
http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/ ... the-world/
http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/ ... ife-easier
God is an Englishman wrote:Based on the fact that we invented the game. That will mean we're always a powerhouse.MegaBonus wrote:based on what?????????
Kosta Utd wrote:God is an Englishman wrote:Based on the fact that we invented the game. That will mean we're always a powerhouse.MegaBonus wrote:based on what?????????
Small p.e.n.i.s syndrome.... Got all the traits.. Bald, fat, middle age
Toomer laughing at his own "jokes" again. Where were you after the Iceland game? Amazing "character".B.Toomer wrote:That's because australia has invented shiraz all of any importance
Uninformed as usual...here's a few for starters...B.Toomer wrote:That's because australia has invented shiraz all of any importance
All fairly significant except for the first one. We could have done without that one.Talk Is Cheap wrote:Uninformed as usual...here's a few for starters...B.Toomer wrote:That's because australia has invented shiraz all of any importance
Whingeing Pom
With the arrival of British immigrants followed by their continual voicing that things weren't as good in Australia as back home in the UK locals invented and coined the phrase "whingeing Pom"
to describe those who persistently complained.
Black box flight recorder
In 1961 Dave Warren created the black box flight recorder - the device that records voices from the cockpit as well as flight data. The durable boxes were designed to replay the final moments before a plane crash, revealing what went wrong. Today, every commercial plane flies with this Australian invention and the recorder sits in the back of planes, to reduce the chances of damage during a crash.
ON THIS DAY: The black box was born
Spray-on skin
In 1999 Professor Fiona Wood patented her spray-on skin technique. The innovation involves taking a small patch of the victim's healthy skin and using it to grow new skin cells in a laboratory. The new skin cells are then sprayed on the victim's damaged skin. This process significantly reduces recovery time and scarring. Fiona and her spray-on skin technique played a key role in treating burns victims from the 2002 Bali bombings. Fiona and her team are credited with saving the lives of 28 people.
Australia's best innovators awarded
Electronic pacemaker
In 1926 Dr Mark Lidwill made an impromptu pacemaker at Sydney's Crown Street Women's Hospital. A newborn patient was suffering from heart problems, so Mark connected the baby's heart to electrodes which stimulated the heartbeat with electric pulses. Concerned about the ethical issues involved with his invention, Mark declined recognition and patents for his invention that has saved many people throughout the world.
Google Maps
From 2003 to 2004 brothers Lars and Jens Rasmussen developed the platform for Google Maps.
Beneath the waves in Sydney with Google Maps
Medical application of penicillin
In 1939 Howard Florey, with a team of scientists, purified penicillin from a special strain of mould. The team demonstrated penicillin's ability to fight bacterial infection in mice and, later, humans. The antibiotic was mass produced and used to aid victims of World War II. Penicillin has been used around the world saving many lives through the combating of infection by common bacteria. Today, it is still widely used in combating infections, but its efficacy is at risk from the growing resistance to the antibiotic.
Australia's Nobel Prize winners
Polymer bank notes
Plastic bank notes were developed in a combined effort by the Reserve Bank of Australia and CSIRO. The polymer material of the bank notes makes them very durable and counterfeit resistant. The bank notes first circulated in Australia in 1988.
Cochlear implant (bionic ear)
In 1978 Professor Graeme Clark successfully tested the bionic ear. Cochlear implants are devices that are implanted into the head to electronically stimulate the auditory nerve. Graeme's motivation to advance hearing loss technology was spawned from his father's inadequate hearing.
Electric drill
In 1889 Australian electrical engineer Arthur James Arnot patented the world's first electric drill. The invention was originally designed to drill rock and dig coal.
Winged keel
Ben Lexcen, an Australian yachtsman and marine architect, created the winged keel, a nearly horizontal foil, or wing, at the base of a sailing boat keel. They are typically found on high-performance sail boats. The winged keel made its debut in 1983 in America's Cup on Australia II.
Looking back: the 1983 America's Cup win
Permaculture
In 1972 Bill Mollison had the epiphany which led to the development of permaculture, a concept that uses a natural approach to designing self-sufficient human settlements and agricultural systems. Today permaculture is an alternative to chemical-based agriculture which can be harmful to humans and the environment
Wi-fi technology
In 1992 John O' Sullivan and the CSIRO developed wi-fi technology. John and his colleagues were originally looking for black holes when they realised the potential of the technology.
Ultrasound scanner
In 1976 Ausonics commercialised the ultrasound scanner. While studying ultrasound technology, CSIRO's Ultrasonic Research Centre discovered a way to differentiate ultrasound echoes bouncing off soft tissue in the body and converting them to TV images. This discovery forever changed pre-natal care as it gave expecting parents a window to the foetus without x-ray exposure. Ultrasound technology is also used in the diagnoses of medical problems of the breast, abdomen, and reproductive organs.
Plastic spectacle lenses
In 1960 Sola Optical released the first scratch-resistant plastic lens for glasses. The technology was further developed to create the first plastic bifocal, trifocal, and progressive-focus lenses. Plastic lenses are used throughout the world due to their many benefits including safety, their light weight, and durability.
Inflatable escape slide and raft
In 1965 Jack Grant, of Qantas, invented the inflatable aircraft escape slide, which is now mandatory safety equipment on all major airlines. The slides also can be used as a flotation device if the aircraft lands on water.
Permanent-crease clothing
In 1957 CSIRO developed a process called Si-Ro-Set. The technique uses chemicals to permanently alter the structure of wool fibres so they can be set with heat. This technology allowed for fashion innovations such as permanently pleated skirts.
Gardasil and Cervarix cancer vaccines
In 2006 Professor Ian Frazer discovered how to create a vaccination for cervical cancer. The commercial application, Gardasil, is a vaccine to prevent certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV). As cervical cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer death in women the vaccination has huge implications for the prevention of cancer.
Frazier lens
In 1993 Jim Frazier's deep-focus lens was patented in the United States. His innovative lens allowed for both the subject and background to be focused on at the same time. It also has the ability to rotate without the movement of the camera. The lens is now commonly used in movies and film throughout the world. Jim won an Academy Award in 1998 for his contribution.
Triton Workcentre
In 1976 the 25-year-old television journalist George Lewin developed the Triton Workcentre. This is a multi-purpose workbench which stabilises and improves the accuracy of portable power tools. It is estimated that 10 per cent of Australian households with a garage now have a Triton Workcentre.
Racecam
In 1979 Channel 7 introduced live television broadcasting from racing cars, allowing viewers to watch the race from the driver's perspective. Today the Racecam has been adapted to fit other sporting events such as snow skiing, basketball and cricket.
Tank-bred tuna system
In 2008 Hagen Stehr may have saved the southern blue fin tuna from extinction. The clean-seas system fools the tuna in a tank into thinking they are swimming out of the Australian Bight and into their breeding grounds.