Inter No. 16

This forum is for the discussion of amateur league football.

It is back by popular demand

Moderators: BillShankly, John Cena, swannsong, Forum Admins

RowePark
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 546
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:52 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by RowePark »

Dos Santos wrote:
rodney. wrote:was there a threat from the player confronting the supporter about "breaking jaws"? Or did the downs supporter just randomly go out of his way to punch a player that was on his way to the change rooms?
So every time there is a threat we can hit someone now?
think he is asking if it was retalliation, or whether there was any reason to have gotten agressive.

SISC
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:49 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by SISC »

It has been an incredibly difficult week at Salisbury Inter, with the passing of one of our most dearly loved and respected members. We do not wish to dishonour her memory by questioning the integrity of any opposition players, supporters or officials on a public forum with comments that are clearly speculative and subjective.

A detailed report outlining yesterdays match, including input from our two ground stewards, will be provided to the amateur league and we will speak with our players and supporters about the incident in line with the standard process.

WASHED UP
Boot Polisher
Boot Polisher
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:17 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by WASHED UP »

Well said Rodney. The supporter was confronted by Butler after he came charging out the change rooms being a big shot. Why did he need to do this? Why did 10/15 people jump in giving cheap shots. That's pathetic

bloodypassit
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 5211
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:11 pm
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by bloodypassit »

If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....

You Too
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 342
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:48 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by You Too »

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
Bloodypacifier winding it up - next you'll be throwing the racist card - Salisburyites v Elizabethans.

Isn't there enough grief in this world - why is everyone so angry now days?

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by God is an Englishman »

Dos Santos wrote:
rodney. wrote:was there a threat from the player confronting the supporter about "breaking jaws"? Or did the downs supporter just randomly go out of his way to punch a player that was on his way to the change rooms?
So every time there is a threat we can hit someone now?
Well a threat to break someone's jaw is assault.
Image

User avatar
Save Ferris
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Save Ferris »

You Too wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
Bloodypacifier winding it up - next you'll be throwing the racist card - Salisburyites v Elizabethans.
Isn't there enough grief in this world - why is everyone so angry now days?
I don't think what he said is wrong.

English
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:00 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by English »

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
To be fair Ghan can't punch people when they are three knuckles deep inside a bloke's anus.

moonshine3
Promising Junior
Promising Junior
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 4:42 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by moonshine3 »

GET OVER IT THE LOT OF YOU & LET WHAT HAPPENS ON THE PITCH STAY ON THE PITCH. ENJOY THE FUN,BANTER,GAME & ALL HAVE A GREAT DAY

User avatar
Save Ferris
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Save Ferris »

Was the incident on the pitch?

No kidding
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 123
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:02 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by No kidding »

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
So it was all Inter was it ?
There needs to be acceptance from the other parties.
Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals and within a metre or 2 of the goal line to boot ( thought that was meant to be the case anyway )
Time to move on now and let whatever investigation take place and maybe that might be a factor that needs improving ??
What will be will be..

User avatar
Save Ferris
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Save Ferris »

No kidding wrote:Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals
Why not?

Brian the Postman
Star Player
Star Player
Posts: 2850
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:40 am
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Brian the Postman »

Save Ferris wrote:
No kidding wrote:Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals
Why not?
Didn't BOSA have a game abandoned because of this?
It's all in the Delivery!

User avatar
Save Ferris
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:34 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Save Ferris »

I don't know.

User avatar
Bomber
Vice Chairman
Vice Chairman
Posts: 60364
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 11:40 am
Has thanked: 44 times
Been thanked: 128 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Bomber »

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
And this has been an issue for many a year with many SAASL clubs. Its only bad if another club does it. Especially a "new" club.
Ignore this signature

User avatar
legga
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1749
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 2:23 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by legga »

No kidding wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
So it was all Inter was it ?
There needs to be acceptance from the other parties.
Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals and within a metre or 2 of the goal line to boot ( thought that was meant to be the case anyway )
Time to move on now and let whatever investigation take place and maybe that might be a factor that needs improving ??
What will be will be..
White line painted behind goal within league regulations, How do you stop anyone standing anywhere on a public recreational space. Next people will want fences like the fed's....... :shock: :shock: :shock:
There is no I in team, but there is a u in suck...

User avatar
Robbo
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 1863
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 6:14 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Robbo »

legga wrote:Next people will want fences like the fed's....... :shock: :shock: :shock:
This is where we are heading if stuff like this keeps happening

supastar#8
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:44 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by supastar#8 »

legga wrote:
No kidding wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
So it was all Inter was it ?
There needs to be acceptance from the other parties.
Should not be spectators gathering behind the goals and within a metre or 2 of the goal line to boot ( thought that was meant to be the case anyway )
Time to move on now and let whatever investigation take place and maybe that might be a factor that needs improving ??
What will be will be..
White line painted behind goal within league regulations, How do you stop anyone standing anywhere on a public recreational space. Next people will want fences like the fed's....... :shock: :shock: :shock:
Sorry Legga didn't say hello on Sunday where were you standing?

FoundIt
Bench Warmer
Bench Warmer
Posts: 559
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:05 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by FoundIt »

bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
because Ghan United are the wrong ethnicity
Im closer than you think

User avatar
ontheblackburner
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1323
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:53 am

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by ontheblackburner »

I think both clubs should be required to forfeit their next match. It seems only fair.

(Calm down everyone, we have Downs next week, all tongue in cheek)

Spectator's behind goals can be an issue. I think there should be an exclusion zone of an agreed distance, since there is no fencing.

I remember a few years back a referee moving our spectators from behind our goal.
#venkysout

Salisbury Florina (1970 - 2018)
2005 SAASL Sunday Division 2 Champions
2009 SAASL Sunday Premier League Champions
2013 SAASL Sunday Division 2 Champions


https://www.facebook.com/MantonStTribe
https://www.twitter.com/MantonStTribe

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by God is an Englishman »

FoundIt wrote:
bloodypassit wrote:If this was Ghan United everyone would be calling for the club to be banned... Yet given its a established club and one with a strong successful history no one has mentioned that the club should be banned .....
because Ghan United are the wrong ethnicity
Got to love the race card.
Image

bloodypassit
Club Captain
Club Captain
Posts: 5211
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 9:11 pm
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by bloodypassit »

ontheblackburner wrote:I think both clubs should be required to forfeit their next match. It seems only fair.

(Calm down everyone, we have Downs next week, all tongue in cheek)

Spectator's behind goals can be an issue. I think there should be an exclusion zone of an agreed distance, since there is no fencing.

I remember a few years back a referee moving our spectators from behind our goal.
There is ..... 3 metres

User avatar
ontheblackburner
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1323
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:53 am

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by ontheblackburner »

bloodypassit wrote:
ontheblackburner wrote:I think both clubs should be required to forfeit their next match. It seems only fair.

(Calm down everyone, we have Downs next week, all tongue in cheek)

Spectator's behind goals can be an issue. I think there should be an exclusion zone of an agreed distance, since there is no fencing.

I remember a few years back a referee moving our spectators from behind our goal.
There is ..... 3 metres
Was this being adhered to?
#venkysout

Salisbury Florina (1970 - 2018)
2005 SAASL Sunday Division 2 Champions
2009 SAASL Sunday Premier League Champions
2013 SAASL Sunday Division 2 Champions


https://www.facebook.com/MantonStTribe
https://www.twitter.com/MantonStTribe

User avatar
redfred
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1770
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 8:13 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by redfred »

surely the downs yobs behind the goal add to the atmosphere. people need to be able to receive and give advise and consider it banter.
"The trouble with referees , they know the rules , but they don't know the game." Bill Shankly

User avatar
swannsong
Technical Director
Technical Director
Posts: 30001
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by swannsong »

I remember a few years ago at Brahma Lodge being told by a referee to move from near the Southern end goal (closer to the corner flag than the goal) where I was taking photographs....never understood why, think he said he wouldn't restart the game until I moved.
Meanwhile at the Northern end (near the changerooms) there were about 80 spectators in a very similar area that he did nothing about..
Image
Southern Knights SC - 2019 - Celebrating 25 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook

User avatar
lefty
First Team Regular
First Team Regular
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:24 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by lefty »

They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one :wink:

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg


And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg
I eat football, I sleep football, I breathe football. I'm not mad, I'm just passionate....Thierry Henry

User avatar
swannsong
Technical Director
Technical Director
Posts: 30001
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 10:15 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by swannsong »

lefty wrote:They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one :wink:

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg


And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg
:lol: 8)
Image
Southern Knights SC - 2019 - Celebrating 25 Years of SAASL Football
SAASL facebook : Southern Knights SC facebook
swannsong Facebook : Elizabeth Downs SC facebook

User avatar
God is an Englishman
Board Member
Board Member
Posts: 51452
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 5:31 pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 85 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by God is an Englishman »

Supporters should not be behind the goals. Only last week they moved all of the Liverpool supporters from the Kop as they were behind the goal.
Image

Old Redback
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1646
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:10 pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by Old Redback »

lefty wrote:They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one :wink:

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg


And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
legga
Squad Player
Squad Player
Posts: 1749
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 2:23 pm

Re: Inter No. 16

Post by legga »

lefty wrote:They've witnessed some great keeper performances from behind those goals here's one :wink:

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg


And some not so great

http://i1066.photobucket.com/albums/u40 ... 00x532.jpg
That is Rusty Gold.... :shock: :shock:
There is no I in team, but there is a u in suck...

Post Reply